I’m delighted to be sharing a publication day, 2 February, with @AdamMGrant and his new book, Think Again. [UK: amzn.to/3oot17A] (US: amzn.to/3pp9PIb] Bookshop: uk.bookshop.org/lists/recent-r…
1/
Well, mostly delighted: that’s one fewer slot on the bestseller lists for me to aim for. Think Again is a stone cold classic and destined to do extremely well.
2/
The book explores three key areas: individual rethinking (the challenges and benefits of reconsidering your views); interpersonal rethinking (how do you get other people to think again?); and collective rethinking (can we shape a culture of respectful and engaged debate?).
3/
It’s full of vignettes – I loved the descriptions of ‘the Difficult Conversations lab’, the robot debater, and the Icelandic presidential election – and it also performs the difficult task of describing complex research in a clear way that makes the reader feel smart.
4/
Adam Grant makes writing seem effortless; he’s funny and charming, he tells you what you need to know without getting lost in the detail.
5/
There's common ground between Think Again and my own book, The Data Detective. Think Again is a book about the science of changing your mind and the minds of others; The Data Detective is a book about clear thinking, armed with the tool of statistics.
timharford.com/books/datadete…
6/
My opening and final chapters, in particular, discuss the challenges of rigid preconceptions and the power of open-minded curiosity; there are some enjoyable resonances between the two books.
7/
One difference, however, is that Adam spends considerable time and energy on the problem of persuasion – how to help other people change their minds.
8/
I had all but given up on persuasion: I’m just happy if I can think straight myself, let alone talk sense into anyone else.
9/
But Adam has encouraged me to think again about that. His chapters on debating and on ‘motivational interviewing’ were fantastic.
10/
How does a ‘vaccine whisperer’ persuade severely hesitant parents to vaccinate their children? By listening to their concerns, and not actively trying to change their minds. Fascinating and moving.
11/
I also found the complementarities between the books enjoyable. It’s always great fun to read someone you respect wrestling with similar issues – for example, the relationship between expertise and clear thinking.
12/
This is such an important idea to me that I began my book with it. My opening chapter discusses the strange case of Abraham Bredius, perhaps the world’s leading expert on Johannes Vermeer.
13/
Bredius was cruelly tricked by what now seems to be a crude forgery. Why? Because he wanted so desperately to believe that his expertise became a liability. He was able to persuade himself with scraps of evidence that you or I wouldn’t have noticed in a hundred years.
14/
Adam discusses some of the same psychological research – and reassuringly, he finds other studies that point to similar conclusions. He writes, “the better you are at crunching numbers, the more spectacularly you fail at analysing patterns that contradict your views”.
15/
Exactly. It’s not that expertise is a liability – far from it. It’s that if you start in a hole of ideology or wishful thinking, your expertise will NOT dig you out. First, calm down and wise up about your preconceptions. Only then start to apply your expertise.
16/
I loved reading this book, learned a lot, and strongly recommend it.
17/
I am interviewing @AdamMGrant about Think Again at the @howtoacademy on Friday evening, 19 February.
howtoacademy.com/events/adam-gr…
18/
To read this thread as a blog post (and sign up for email updates) - here: timharford.com/2021/01/adam-g…
19/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tim Harford

Tim Harford Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TimHarford

29 Jan
Will it ever end? In November we were celebrating the announcements of several effective vaccines. Now hospitals are overwhelmed and the global death toll is climbing twice as fast as the worst days of the first wave.
At times like this, I reach for my calculator.
1/
There are two reasons why these vaccines, some highly effective, have not yet done anything obvious to save lives or protect hospitals.
The first is evident: not enough people have been vaccinated so far.
2/
The second reason is that the vaccine takes time to work. In the UK, Margaret Keenan received a first dose of vaccine bright and early on December 8, but it needs a couple of weeks to provide much protection. She and her fellow first-day vaccinees were safer by Christmas.
3/
Read 16 tweets
28 Jan
They called Abraham Bredius 'The Pope', a nickname that poked fun at his self-importance while acknowledging his authority. Bredius was the world's leading scholar of the mysterious Dutch master, Johannes Vermeer.
1/
When Bredius was younger, he’d made his name by spotting works wrongly attributed to Vermeer. Now, at the age of 82, he had just published a highly respected book and was enjoying a retirement swan song in Monaco.
2/
It was at this moment, in 1937, that Gerard Boon paid a visit to his villa. Boon, a former Dutch MP, came to Bredius on behalf of dissidents in Mussolini’s Italy. They needed to raise money to fund their escape to the US. Tthey had something which might be of value.
3/
Read 10 tweets
22 Jan
Has there been a moment in modern history where so many people in free societies have believed such damaging lies?
ft.com/content/b25595…
1/
It’s easy to point to the US, where nearly 90 per cent of people who voted for Donald Trump believe Joe Biden’s election victory was not legitimate.
2/
But it’s not just the US. In France, a minority of adults are confident that vaccines are safe, which explains why only 40 per cent say they plan to get a Covid-19 shot.
3/
Read 17 tweets
21 Jan
1/ What a difference a few weeks makes. In mid-December, I asked a collection of wise guests on my BBC radio programme How to Vaccinate the World about the importance of second doses. bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00…
2/ At that stage, only economists - notably @Atabarrok – were suggesting giving people single doses of a vaccine instead of the recommended pair of doses. My panel roundly rejected this idea.
3/ But in the face of a shortage of doses and a rapidly spreading strain of “Super-Covid”, the scientific mainstream appears to have drifted. The UK’s policy is now to prioritise the first dose and to deliver the second one within three months rather than three weeks.
Read 14 tweets
13 Jan
1/ Things seem really bad at the moment. That's because things ARE really bad at the moment. But I wanted to share a perspective that might encourage you a little.
2/ Deaths have been so heavily concentrated among the elderly that even the current very limited vaccine rollout should have big benefits soon. Here's some back-of-the-envelope maths:
3/ As @ActuaryByDay told @BBCMoreOrLess a few weeks ago, more than a third of all Covid deaths in the first wave in the UK were among the few hundred thousand people who live in care homes residents. Another third were among people over the age of 80.
Read 8 tweets
20 Oct 20
HAPPY WORLD STATISTICS DAY EVERYONE!

World Statistics Day only comes every five years - like the Olympics - so it's time to express a little mindful gratitude for all the statisticians and other wonderful nerds out there helping us to understand the world.
Since I literally wrote the book on the topic, I’d like to mark the day by sharing my TEN RULES FOR THINKING DIFFERENTLY ABOUT NUMBERS. Each of us could be thinking more clearly about the world if we got ourselves right with the numbers. timharford.com/books/worldadd…
So, Rule One: SEARCH YOUR FEELINGS.
What we believe, or refuse to believe, is strongly influenced by our emotional reaction. A lot of the statistical claims we see aren’t just data: they are weapons in an argument. Social media thrives on emotion. So do media headlines.
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!