What's a short?
Short-sellers borrow shares of an asset that they believe will drop in price in order to buy them after they fall. If they're right, they return the shares and pocket the difference between the price when they initiated the short and the actual sale price.
If they're wrong, they're forced to buy at a higher price and pay the difference between the price they set and its sale price.
Short sales have an expiration date, so when a stock unexpectedly rises in price, the short-sellers may have to act fast to limit their losses.
What's a Short Squeeze?
A short squeeze occurs when a stock jumps sharply higher, forcing traders who had bet that its price would fall, to buy it in order to forestall even greater losses. Their scramble to buy only adds to the upward pressure on the stock's price.
The flight of short-sellers and their impact on the stock's price is known as a short squeeze. Short sellers are being squeezed out of their positions, usually at a loss.
Short-sellers open positions on stocks t
they believe will decline in price. However sound their reasoning, it can be upended by positive news story, product announcement, or an earnings beat that excites buyers.
Or, a reddit group deciding to short squeeze the stock.
The turnaround in the stock’s fortunes may prove to be temporary. But if it's not, the short seller can face runaway losses as the expiration date on their positions approaches. They generally opt to sell out immediately even if it means taking a substantial loss.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rising serpent 🇺🇸

Rising serpent 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rising_serpent

11 Jan
It's been a long time since I said it, and who knows if there'll be a chance to do so in the future. So here goes:
I've learned more by being on Twitter than I could have imagined, and it was possible only because so many excellent people say so many amazing things. So thank you
I had absolutely no intention of using social media when I started. It was just a way to defray and externalize internal angst while having to forgo the almost always painful work of personal reflection.
I wrote about it a year after I joined.
It was nothing more than a sojourn into the septic tank of human behavior that was supposed to make my station in life feel better by comparison.
Then the inconceivable happened.
People said stuff that made sense, resonated and instructed.
Read 15 tweets
30 Nov 20
1. Did you know that this isn't the first time Georgia's Dominion voting machines crashed or suffered a "glitch?"
The same thing happened a few months ago in September.
2. "Election officials initially thought they would have to rebuild the database but then discovered they could fix the problem through a software change"
How the hell do you go from a completely corrupted and unusable database to just needing a software update?
3. And in September Eric Coomer (yes that guy) told  U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg  that the problem had to do with the way the voting machines communicate with the underlying Android operating system. He told Totenberg "a minor software change" would address the issue.
Read 15 tweets
28 Nov 20
1. This is absolutely wild.
Did you know that the most comprehensive, detailed and well articulated exposal of the dangers inherent in the wdespread implementation of electronic voting systems came from a Democrat, and a it happened a decade ago way back in 2010?
2. John C. Bonifaz is an attorney and political activist specializing in constitutional law and voting rights. 
He also ran for Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 2006 as a Democrat.
(Just so we can dispense with the "right-wing conspiracy theory" right now)
3. On July 6th 2010 he highlighted to the Technical Guidelines Development Committee
and Its UOCAVA Working Group what is, in essence, the exact same concerns that the Trump team including @SidneyPowell1 @RudyGiuliani @LLinWood have repeatedly underscored over the last few weeks.
Read 35 tweets
18 Nov 20
1. The Danish mask study is probably the only Randomized controlled trial conducted so far to study mask efficacy to prevent COVID. Blinding was of course not possible.
Remember that randomized trials provide superior data compared to observational ones.
acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M2…
2. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection in the mask wearer at 1 month by antibody testing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or hospital diagnosis.
3. A total of 3030 participants were randomly assigned to the recommendation to wear *surgical* masks, and 2994 were assigned to control; 4862 completed the study. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 occurred in 42 participants recommended masks (1.8%) and 53 control participants (2.1%).
Read 13 tweets
10 Nov 20
1. Since 2019, Perkins Coie has been paid at least $41 million for its political work by Democratic-affiliated organizations, according to Federal Election Commission records.
2. If you don't know who or what Perkins Coie is, think of them as the biggest clearing clearing house for the most repugnant Orcs.
I wrote about them many years ago.
3. Think of Marc Elias as the unfortunate result of what happens when an orc impregnates Brian Stelter. Except much more odious, bombastic pompous and vacuous. And just as big and insensate a Democrat controlled phallic toy.
Of course he's a super lawyer.
perkinscoie.com/en/professiona…
Read 24 tweets
9 Nov 20
I cannot overstate the importance of this thread. It's technical but well worth reading and rereading to understand the gravity of what's being said.
Large orders of magnitude data tends to follow a normal distribution.
Observing anomalies in distribution gives crucial insight.
1. To simplify it the best I can:
In person voting tends to not have a simplistic Democrat versus Republican linear distribution along a mean when you plot all votes. Because there are regional variations, families work together, as to friends with similar political persuasions.
2. On the other hand mailing ballots tend to have a fairly homogenous and almost linear distribution when plotted on a Democrat versus Republican X and Y axis distribution
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!