Cost overruns and delays building up for UK’s Hinkley Point C nuclear power station. Total cost now estimated at £23 billion in 2015 pounds, that’s around £26.6 billion in today’s money = €30.1 billion, or €9,400 per kW. ft.com/content/fbc43d…
Hinkley Point C’s completion date has been pushed back by another 6 months, to mid-2026, that’s 5.5 years from now.
In October 2013, UK govt expected the plant to be completed in 2023. Construction started in December 2018.
“EDF will turn on its first nuclear plant in Britain before Christmas 2017 because it will be the right time,” Vincent de Rivaz, then its UK chief executive, promised in 2007. “It is the moment of the power crunch. Without it the lights will go out.”
The UK will pay EdF £92.50 per MWh of Hinkley Point C’s electricity, but that’s in 2012 pounds, so indexed. Today, it would already be £109.95 = €124.30.
By the time the plant starts operation, this will of course be more, and then it will go up for another 35 years.
Because of the rapidly increasing offshore wind capacity in the UK and other North Sea countries (~80 GW by 2030), Hinkley Point C’s electricity will have close to zero value in an increasing number of hours. In those hours, the full guaranteed amount per MWh will be subsidy.
When the guaranteed price for Hinkley Point C's nuclear electricity was agreed, in 2013, the £92.50/MWh appeared 35% cheaper than offshore wind. Today, the £110/MWh is 150% more expensive than new offshore wind.
Since UK govt has essentially guaranteed EdF 35 years of revenues of at least £2.75 billion as long as they run the plant for 8,000 hours/year, half a billion overruns here or there aren't necessarily killing for its business case.
Assuming the average indexed strike price over those 35 years (2026-2061) will be around £160 per MWh, that's guaranteed revenues of £143 billion. A decent amount!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This was driven by the continued growth of wind and solar, now supplying 20% of all EU electricity. The dip in electricity demand due to the corona crisis (4% for the year as a whole) had a modest effect.
The growth of renewable electricity was a major factor in the decline of coal-fired power generation in the EU, to only 13% of the total in 2020.
This development was helped by the higher EU-ETS CO2 price (now €34 = $41 per tonne).
What drives me totally mad is the unbelievable naivete of part of the press, intelligent people, and NL TV news. "Why wasn't the Capitol protected any better?" Come on people, use your brain. Who do you think was in charge of that?
German electricity 2020 (public grid):
- Renewables at 50.5% (over 50% for the first time)
- Wind power produced more electricity than brown coal and hardcoal together
So this was our second warmest year ever, here in the Netherlands, 1.6⁰C warmer than the preheated 1981-2010 average.
The three last years are now all in the top-6, out of 120.
When I was born, the Netherlands had just experienced its warmest year ever: 1959, with an average temperature of 10.15⁰C. It took 29 years to surpass that.
Now we call that 'normal'; it became the 1981-2010 average.
Next year, when we will start calling the 1991-2020 average normal, we'll call it 'a cold year': the annual average temperature of 1991-2020 was 0.5⁰C higher than that of 1981-2010. That's a big jump, in just 10 years.
Weird story on the front page of @nrc. A year ago, NL govt promised to ensure 5 months supply of medicines by mid-2022. But it hasn't started yet. This year, 1,500 medicines were unavailable, and by now, the average pharmacy spends 17.5 hours/week trying to get hold of those.
That means that around 1,000 Dutch pharmacy employees are now chasing missing medicines, full time.
Reason for shortage? "Long supply lines from Asia; it takes 8 months for an order to arrive in NL." Eight months?!
Reason for not starting to build the stock? "It is still unclear who should pay."
Lack of preparation time? "The decision to build the stock was the result of 6(!) years of intensive discussions between insurers, pharmaceutical companies, wholesale, pharmacies and the Ministry."
The good news: when our old fridge broke down, we bought ourselves a new one with an A+++ energy label (left).
The bad news: that label is only valid through 28 February 2021. The next day, that same fridge will have a D label; the new sticker was already included too.
It's the result of 'raising the bar' in EU appliance standards, long overdue.
Due to substantial improvements, almost all fridges had A/A+/A++/A+++ labels by now. The new scale should drive further innovation, leading to even lower electricity consumption. ec.europa.eu/info/energy-cl…