J&J ENSEMBLE data is here - what. a. day.

It works with a single, simple to distribute, shot, which is huge. And it's complicated.

Largest set of events yet: 468 people with symptomatic Covid-19 in 43,783

...1/n jnj.com/johnson-johnso…
...34% were over 60 (14,672 people). Diverse, from South Africa & the Americas. 41% had co-morbidities putting them at risk of severe Covid-19. Protection was consistent across age, race, & part of the world - even though 95% in SA were infected with the new "SA" variant...2/n
...First trial powered to answer the severe Covid-19 question: efficacy was 85% at 28 days after the injection (no event breakdown or confidence intervals). For moderate to severe, efficacy was 66%, varying a bit in the 3 regions (from 57% in SA to 72% in the US...3/n
...Efficacy against severe disease increased over time - all the severely ill people were in the first 49 days. There were 0 people hospitalized, 0 deaths. But they don't report the mild/moderate/severe breakdown of the 468 illnesses...4/n
...This is clearly a "quick fix" for the worst that this disease does, to people & to healthcare systems & that's fabulous & so badly needed. But the absence of the data the others reported raises questions. Good they have 2-dose trial results coming soon...5/n
...On safety & adverse events, the only specific data is for fever: only 0.2% rate for grade 3 (moderate) (presumably 0 severe). And they report no anaphylaxis (allergic reaction)...6/n
...How does it compare to others? Tricky when they're such different trials & this one is particularly different: it's even harder without more detailed data. Single dose may cost some efficacy, but with such a huge advantage, too. Hard to tell. 7/n
...Another important piece of data on J&J vaccine in an NIH press release: 5 deaths from Covid-19 in this trial, all in the placebo group nih.gov/news-events/ne…

Between the other 2 big trials - Tozinameran (BNT/Pfizer) & Moderna - there was 1 Covid death (placebo gp).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hilda Bastian, PhD

Hilda Bastian, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hildabast

28 Jan
Interim readout from Novavax phase 3 from the 15k UK & 4.4k phase 2b from South Africa. High efficacy in the UK: 89.3% (95% CI: 75.2 – 95.4) - lowered a bit by the new variant...1/n ir.novavax.com/news-releases/… Image
...SA results heavily affected by new variant. Overall efficacy was 60% efficacy (95% CI: 19.9 – 80.1) for the bulk of people who were HIV- : very wide confidence intervals, because it's a small trial. With small HIV+ group included, (efficacy of 49.4%; 95% CI: 6.1 – 72.8) ...2/n
...Critically, the primary efficacy result, as for the other vaccines, is for people who hadn't had a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. But 1/3 did. No data released for them, but previous infection may not protect against the new "SA" variant ...3/n Image
Read 8 tweets
26 Jan
Meanwhile, a few days ago the EMA published its EPAR (public assessment report) on the Moderna vax (HT @pajz_) ema.europa.eu/en/documents/a… It's 169 pages ...1/n
...There was "a major objection" to the US manufacturing sites, so they were withdrawn. Complete transfer for Europe to Swiss manufacturing due to conclude soon. (There have been Qs in the US about a batch there reuters.com/article/us-hea…)...2/n
...If you're interested in the chemical & biological aspects of this vaccine, there are pages for you to dig into - not an area I have any expertise in. Small amount of detail of reproductive toxicity study (in rats): no cause for concern....3/n
Read 10 tweets
25 Jan
It's on the agenda this week: possibly a decision on the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine from EMA's (Euro drug regulator) Human Medicine Committee? Applicants will be questioned at the meeting.

(EMA process steps explained here: ema.europa.eu/en/human-regul…)
Last night, I tweeted ⬆️ that the EMA (Euro drug regulator) meeting was considering the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine. I included a link to EMA processes, because the language on the agenda suggested there could be a problem: this is the explanation I mean in that link ....1/n
...German newspapers now reporting a claim the efficacy rate for people over 65 is only 8% & approval is indeed in question for that age group, at least (Paywalls: I can't read in full.) Rumor at this point, but a limit ...2/n bild.de/bild-plus/poli…, handelsblatt.com/politik/deutsc…
Read 15 tweets
24 Jan
TGA, Australia's drug regulator, has issued a 2-year provisional approval for Tozinameran (BNT/Pfizer vaccine) from age 16, & released its 42-page assessment report tga.gov.au/auspar/auspar-… ...1/n
...One of the conditions is TGA approval of at least 20 vials from each batch before release...2/n
..Study of reproductive safety in rats has been completed & found no signs of concern related to pregnancy. This wasn't completed when the FDA reported. No data is in this report though. Otherwise it's the same data basis...3/n
Read 5 tweets
22 Jan
For everyone else who's on ENSEMBLE-Watch - the big J&J trial for their Ad26.COV2.S vaccine - some background & context in case a press release lands soon. (On Wednesday, Stanford got the word to lock their data abc7news.com/johnson-and-va… so it is on!)...1/5
...It's a big trial - close to the size of the Pfizer trial for Tozinameran, substantially bigger than Moderna's - & the most international one. And co-primary endpoints are for moderate to severe Covid-19, including 1 at a month - which is longer than we've seen previously...2/5
...You can see the protocol for the trial here: jnj.com/coronavirus/co… (Note, it was originally for 60,000 but they got so many events it was cut back to 40)...3/5
Read 6 tweets
20 Jan
Sputnik V news: ANMAT, Argentina's drug regulator, has now extended authorization to people 60+ & released some data this time. Here's the listing of what they've received & analyzed (but it's not published) ... 1/n argentina.gob.ar/noticias/ampli…
...The new data on people 60+ they received: in 2,144 people, vaccine efficacy of 91.8% (95% CI 67.1% -98.3%). Almost all those people had antibodies by 28 days ...2/n
...ANMAT reports there's now data for 19,866 people who received both Sputnik V injections, with no serious adverse events (SAEs) judged to be vaccine-related. There were 47 SAEs in vax group vs 23 in placebo. Safety similar for older people in small safety study. 3/3
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!