Quick note here: The EU contract was signed after the U.K. contract, so AZ should have mentioned that priority clause. Instead they said there were under no obligation possibly hindering their best effort to supply the EU.
A lot of sh**show could have been avoided.
A lot of sh**show could have been avoided.
https://twitter.com/fascinatorfun/status/1355283019238617099
The EU reaction was bad, and AZ has a right to set priorities.
But this wasn’t taken into account in EU vaccination plans because the opposite is stated in the contract.
Again a lot of sh**show could have been avoided.
But this wasn’t taken into account in EU vaccination plans because the opposite is stated in the contract.
Again a lot of sh**show could have been avoided.
https://twitter.com/rosiex_/status/1355132343963496451
Of course the EU wonders if the money it gave AZ is being used to supply the U.K. first.
The U.K. contract was not published and anyway the payment schedule would be redacted.
But EU’s main problem is it based its vaccination plan on inaccurate, misleading information.
The U.K. contract was not published and anyway the payment schedule would be redacted.
But EU’s main problem is it based its vaccination plan on inaccurate, misleading information.
Again it doesn’t mean the EU reacted appropriately
It needs to stop panicking (@vonderleyen?), &?while exploring other options like Johnson&Johnson vaccine (as good as AZ but one jab) focus on boosting/building/borrowing vaccine fabrication capacity &open it to reliable providers
It needs to stop panicking (@vonderleyen?), &?while exploring other options like Johnson&Johnson vaccine (as good as AZ but one jab) focus on boosting/building/borrowing vaccine fabrication capacity &open it to reliable providers
https://twitter.com/tconnellyrte/status/1355253347859787778
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
