GameStop is an interesting story, but there is a bigger and much more serious question about financial markets
As someone who studies finance, I know finance has tremendous potential to benefit society
But there is something serious to worry in the trend since the 80s
Let's start with the story we like to tell students in finance 101
"financial markets take money from savers and give it to entrepreneurs who invest it to make economic growth possible"
This is indeed a very important function of financial markets
However ....
Since the 80s financial market has increasingly been doing something quite different
The size of financial sector has almost *doubled* in terms of credit given out per $ of output
Yet, investment has not risen at all and in fact been trending down
So what is all this credit creation for?
As an example, let's looking at corporate credit, and in particular corporate bonds: these are $'s that large corporations borrow from financial markets
Surely this money must be used as finance 101 predicts?
Not really
While there's been a large increase in corporate bond issuance, on net its all gone back to shareholders via stock buybacks
In fact the red line here is *net* equity buy back - which means even after accounting for new equity issuance, buy backs dominate
The Bils of $ borrowed every year are used to buy back stock and not to make any real investment
Why go through the hassle of borrowing if you don't need the money? It helps to save on taxes
There is a lot more that's going on here
For example, the big rise of finance since the 80's is closely related to the rise in inequality that has produced a "saving glut of the rich" (see paper)
Students wanting to do a PhD in economics are often told that math is important
here's why (and some important caveats) ...
Markets need to balance out on average, e.g. the total purchase of cotton must equal the total production of cotton by farmers.
There are thousands of such markets and they must all balance out! How does this happen?
It is not possible to keep track of all this without resorting to mathematics, which is a tool for imposing rules and logic that nature dictates must hold.
Then there are many practical economic problems that at their core are mathematical riddles.
It is a science that helps us understand how we are all connected in a mutually-reliant ecosystem
e.g. one person's supply is another person's demand ...
economics gives us insights into how we can design this ecosystem so we help each other become better off, or how we can screw things up in a mutually destructive manner
At its finest, economics is about making the sum bigger than its parts
perhaps contrary to some people's perception, some of the deepest insights of economics are about how selfish and individualistic behavior can be destructive for the broader society - precisely because we are all connected
One of the hardest questions is what makes societies change?
"functioning" societies take care of each other, develop trust, tend to work for the common good - and as a result become richer
"mis-functioning" societies seem to do everything in reverse - and as result remain poor
Both types of societies are stable, meaning they can go on like that for long periods of time
The obvious question is how can one change a mis-functioning society into a functioning one? How does change happen at the system level?
Obviously, no single answer here
But by construction, change will be hard - very hard.
Because the reason mis-functioning societies mis-function is that there are groups that are collectively in control, and they benefit from the mis-function
So change requires annoying these dudes, and they don't like that