THREAD: One can choose to worship
-One god
-1000 gods
-no god
One can reject their faith of birth & adopt a new one.
This is LIBERTY of THOUGHT, EXPRESSION, BELIEF & FAITH that Constitution gives everyone. This Ordinance takes away this liberty & says 'aise kaise?!' [1/n]
Before we go on, remember that conversion does not mean that one stops being an Indian citizen or that they become 'lesser' Indians for some reason. This law thinks that freedom of religion is antithetical to India's identity, which'd be funny if it weren't dangerous [2/n]
The Ordinance defines mass conversion as 'two or more people converting', which means if spouses convert together it is a crime. This is a picture of Babasaheb at Deekshabhoomi, leading conversion of a 'mass' from Hinduism to Buddhism. The Ordinance makes this a crime [3/n]
This law creates the concept of a 'convertor' which is an absurd idea. Many people convert to religion by independent study or by learning about other religions. This wrongly presumes that every conversion is a product of some conspiracy. [4/n]
Section 3 also prohibits anyone who "convinces" a person to convert. What if a person says that "I believe in Islam, for these specific reasons" & someone is convinced by these reasons? For anyone who respects independent thinking & free choice this cannot be a crime. [5/n]
Burden of proving that the conversion was ‘lawful’ lies on the person who has ‘caused’ the conversion. It doesn't matter if the person who is converting is saying that s/he did it willingly. Instead, it is assumed that someone has ‘caused’ it. We're adult citizens, not kids [6/n]
Faith is a question of conscience but the Ordinance makes it a public affair. A convert has to apply to Magistrate before converting, who'll conduct an inquiry. One's parents, siblings, cousins, in-laws & even adopted children can complain against conversion. [7/n]
Any member of public can 'object' to my conversion. What right does a random mob have to decide if my belief in God (or lack thereof) is 'lawful'? This is simply going to put people's lives at risk & invite harm upon them [8/n]
So far 79/86 people booked under this law are Muslims. 7 are Christians. 2/86 are minor girls. This law is not only targeting boys but their whole families.
-26 family members of a Muslim man were booked in Etah. The alleged conversion happened a week before the Ordinance [9/n]
Article 20(1) of Constitution prohibits punishing someone for a crime before a law on it was enacted. But UP Police does not care because the accused is a Muslim.
-In Mau, an FIR was lodged against 16 members of a family.
-In Sitapur, 14 family members were booked [10/n]
-A Muslim boy in Bijnor went out for a pizza with girl. The girl has repeatedly said that the boy never brought up conversion, even the father of the girl has clarified but was forced to complain against the boy. He is still in jail. [11/n]
In Kanth, a man had to spend 15 days in jail, his wife was sent to Nari Niketan & suffered a miscarriage due. The girl kept repeating that her conversion & marriage was voluntary but police arrested the boy because of a local Bajrang Dal complaint [12/n]
In two separate incidents, two Muslim women in Bareilly district got married to Hindu men after conversion and were given police security. This is the exact opposite of what happened when the men were Muslim. This is the real purpose of this lie called Love Jihad [13/n]
The Centre told Lok Sabha that no “case of love jihad had been reported by any central agency. Investigations by NIA, Karnataka CID, Kanpur SIT, DGP Kerala have said there's no evidence either. In Hadiya case SC said “parental love or concern cannot be allowed to.....[14/n]
...fluster the right of choice of an adult woman in choosing a man to whom she gets married” Marriage is between 2 people, it's a civil matter. Using criminal law on such issues is wrong. Many have been taken aback by this Ordinance. I'd said this when triple talaq law...[15/n]
...was enacted & I was mocked. Hope this Ordinance removes any blinders that people had on the targeted use of criminal law. My faith or my spouse are my choices. I should be the only one who should've control over it. This Ordinance wants to take over this control [n/n]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#HyderabadRains I've personally seen the devastation that the deluge has caused to people in Hyderabad Parliament Constituency & Rajendernagar. People have lost their life savings, they've also lost essential all household items: stoves, clothes, utensils @TelanganaCMO [1]
I urge @TelanganaCMO to help these families get back on their feet. They're in distress & need urgent relief. According to GO MS 2 of 2015, houses that have suffered serious/partial damage are entitled to 95,100 rupees. 75% of this amount is to come from Govt of India [2]
In GHMC & its adjoining municipalities, the destruction due to flash-floods has been total. It is essential that the relief is given immediately. I understand that the State's finances are in a difficult situation due to the Centre's refusal to pay GST compensation [3]
THREAD: BJP was a strong votary of NRC in Assam. After the people of Assam went through a harrowing experience just to get themselves listed, BJP was disappointed because it didn't exclude enough Muslims. The bogeyman of 'millions of illegal immigrants' was busted. Now...
...they're trying to discredit the final list & restart the whole procedure so that an "adequate" number of Bengali Muslims can be excluded
They're using administrative trickery to say that the final NRC wasn't published & so it can be changed. It was published on 31 August 2019
The powers of LRCR & DRCR can ONLY be exercised before publication of NRC not after. RGI is yet to NOTIFY the final NRC. Any changes after publication of NRC are patently illegal
Put an end to this cumbersome process, NOTIFY the list. Don't drag it on for your political ends
On #Madrasas, 9 PM Nationalists should know some facts:
1 Many madrasas offer religious as well as non-religious education. Increasingly, many also offer modern skills such as computer literacy
2 How many Muslim kids go to Madrasas? Only 3%
3 A school offering religious...
...instruction is protected by one's fundamental rights under Articles 25, 26 & 30. Demonising Madrasas & the children who study in them is bad faith propaganda
4 GoI has funded Madrasa development for 20 years. While @PMOIndia has reduced the amount to 120 cr from 375 crore...
...even he hasn't done away with it. In fact, 6 state governments, including UP give grants to Madrasas. Governments have a duty to improve school education for all. What will 9 PM nationalists do when they realise that their Masters have been....*gasps*..."funding" Madrasas?!
Why does this statement not say that China is in control of 1000 sq. km of territory that previously we used to patrol? Who's held responsible for this illegal occupation?
Was @PMOIndia right in saying that no Indian territory is occupied & there have been no intrusions?
Remember @AmitShah's "will give life for Aksai Chin" statement in December last year? Have you backtracked from this position & decided to cede territory to China in Ladakh?
How did we lose 20 brave personnel in Galwan? What happened on that night?
Hon'ble @loksabhaspeaker sir separation of powers is part of basic structure of Constitution. Parliament has the power & duty to question the govt. We're elected to ask questions & hold the govt accountable. A session that takes up only govt business prevents us from doing so
There's a requirement for 15 days' notice period for questions & I request that questions from members be accepted starting today so that the House can take up questions well within time. It's also your discretion to reduce the notice period u/r 33 of LS Rules of Procedure
One may also consider a single day's sitting for only Questions. In any case, nothing prevents the govt from answering unstarred questions
Similarly Hon'ble Speaker enjoys the discretion to issue a revised bulletin that accounts for private members business & questions
THREAD: Supreme Court's Puttaswamy judgement stated very clearly that privacy is a fundamental right. There's a huge risk when our personal info is used without our consent. Most importantly, facial recognition technology is unreliable & biased. This is why I'll be submitting...
a Private Members' Bill banning use of facial recognition & remote biometric surveillance technology. Such technology can record & use your gait to identify to you Face recognition technology is inaccurate in identifying dark people women, persons with disabilities & young people
The accuracy of these technologies depends on the database. These databases are themselves riddled with bias. For example, a database of arrested people will obviously have an over-representation of SCs, STs & Muslims.