On BBC Newshour this afternoon, hear me and @chasestrangio discuss transgirls in females sports.

@bbcworldservice

From 45:00 mins in.

bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/w1…
I have some follow up questions for Chase.

1. Thanks for promoting me to professor, but I am not a professor.
2. You claim I said there wasn't "any dominance" of transgirls/transwomen, when I actually said there wasn't yet any "systematic dominance" but that individual athletes were displacing girls and women.
3. You claim we haven't seen any "significant performance" from transgirls/transwomen. This is not true. There are plenty of examples of individuals who have dominated their races/sports to the detriment of female competitors.
4. You claim no transwomen qualified for the 2020 Olympics. This is not true (or would not have been true, were qualifiers completed). Not only were there transwomen due to appear, there were possibilities of medals (see Laurel Hubbard, NZ weightlifting).
5. You say, "They are not males, they are girls". "Male" describes a body type regarding reproduction. It's a simple, neutral scientific description that applies to all species that reproduce in a particular way. Including humans.
6. You claim transgirls/transwomen have no other place in sport. This is not true. There is no barrier to competing in the male category, in open categories or in mixed sports.
7. You say it is "categorically untrue that transgirls/transwomen are bio equivalent to non-trans boys/men".

In what sense is that the case for Andraya Yearwood and Terri Miller, when they started competing in the absence of any medical intervention?
8. You evoke what I call the Phelps Gambit.

Do you believe that a female with the same background genetics as Phelps delivering the same favourable wingspan or lactic acid metabolism would swim at the same speed as him?
9. You claim that "transgirls who transition at a young age are physically equivalent to cisgirls". Can you provide citations for this please?
10. You say that there are "100s of years worth of data showing that no simple fact determines sex", yet humans have reliably identified sex for evolutionary timescales. Weird, huh.
That's it. I apologise if I had inadvertently misquoted you. I may have made statements shorter for Twitter, or jotted notes incorrectly, but have no intent to misrepresent.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emma Hilton

Emma Hilton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FondOfBeetles

27 Jan
In which Joanna Harper repeatedly acknowledges that transwomen remain bigger, taller and stronger than females.

podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/be-… podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/be-…
Despite this, Harper insists that ‘meaningful competition’ can be achieved.

She doesn’t define ‘meaningful competition’, let alone outline how it can be achieved.
Harper does spend time arguing about language (use of ‘male’ is ‘inaccurate’, apparently) and over which distances hurdles are run (the moderator accidentally speculated on a 200mh race....)
Read 10 tweets
23 Jan
US/protect female sports/Day 3 #ForXX

Steube has reintroduced a Bill to demand compliance with Title IX by excluding males from female sports.

Twitter support welcome! @RepGregSteube

More actions below ⬇️
Details of the Bill can be found here:

steube.house.gov/media/press-re…
It’s very simple:
Read 4 tweets
21 Jan
Pre-transition, age 19-26 years old, Richards made five singles appearances in the US Open and twice proceeded to second round.

Richards transitioned in 1975, age 41 years old, and was approved for female competition in 1977.
Post-transition, age 43-47 years old and again in the US Open, Richards made five singles appearances and once proceeded to third round, once proceeded to second round.
In that same period, Richards also made four doubles appearances (once proceeded to final, twice proceeded to third round, once proceeded to second round) and three mixed doubles appearances (once proceeded to semi-final, once proceeded to third round).
Read 5 tweets
19 Jan
This is an interesting read, framed by understanding sex as a system, not individuals.

‘But the male and female sexes are not two types of individuals; they actually represent two different reproductive strategies...’

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…
‘...and in many organisms, these two strategies are distributed among individuals in a population in a variety of ways.’
‘What we tend to think of as the sexes arose from this isogamous state during the evolution of anisogamy (from Greek aniso‐ “unequal”), where the emerging male and female sexual strategies involve, by definition, the production of many small or few large gametes, respectively.’
Read 8 tweets
18 Jan
"He remembered going into the Women’s Place from when he was very small. Around about the time he was seven or eight he started to be unwelcome there. Women shoo’d him away, or stopped what they were doing.
"The Women’s Place became like the moon; he knew where it was but didn’t even think about going there.
"The Women's Place, a round bowl of a valley full of sunlight. The gardens of the women grew the things that made living enjoyable, possible and longer: spices, fruits and chewing roots. They dug up or traded plants.
Read 15 tweets
15 Jan
Our letter, The Reality of Sex, has been published today in the Irish Journal of Medical Science.

@egipam @SwipeWright @davecurtis314

link.springer.com/article/10.100…
‘Human sex is an observable, immutable, and important biological classification; it is a fundamental characteristic of our species, foundational to many biology disciplines, and a major differentiator in medical/health outcomes.’
‘Public discourse around sex increasingly seeks to deny basic facts of human biology.’
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!