Next side quest---"Get Structure"---is open for my history writing seminar, and I'm going to post a twitter-friendly version of it here:

#acwri #twitterstorians
Writing something the length of a dissertation/book chapter is not a natural thing to do! It takes effort, and to be sustainable, it takes effort distributed over time.
Even the most insightful thinker does not think in polished essays; they think in chunks, in furtive observations, in half-realized concepts, and then they fashion all of those things into a polished essay by spending the time to develop them.
Lynn Hunt has argued that we don't even really start thinking until we start writing:

historians.org/publications-a…
So, the purpose of this side quest is to explore all the ways you can help yourself do that long work in a sustainable way by structuring your time.
There's no single model for success (despite the enthusiasm people have for saying "just write every day!"). Instead, there are a lot of different options for practice, and part of your task is to figure out what is the sustainable way *for you* to manage *your* effort.
So, what's your current structure for writing and research? (If the answer is, "I don't have one!" that's okay!) Think about it as you answer these questions---and I suggest actually writing out answers.
*what does a normal writing session look like for you? where and when does it happen? how long does it last?

*do you have any regular schedule for your writing?

*where and how do you keep track of your deadlines?

*what usually interrupts or gets in the way of your writing?
*what's the largest project you ever completed, and how did you manage it?

*were you satisfied with how sustainable your practice was? were the people around you---your friends, your loved ones who know you---satisfied with how sustainable your practice was?
*when do you start drafting ideas during a project?

*relatedly, how often do you find yourself looking for just one more article before you get started?

*do you use any accountability tools, like writing together with others? keeping a logbook of your writing sessions?
Once you answer all of those with a clear eye on what you've already been doing, you can evaluate where there might be room for change, and even start to think about experimenting with different practices.
Here's the trick: pick ONE THING to tinker with.
You can't overhaul a process that has served you---and if you're writing a dissertation, you've written well enough to get yourself into the position of writing a dissertation, so your process has been working!---all at once.
So, pick *one thing*, make yourself a limited schedule for trying it (like, two weeks), and commit to trying it.
Then, tell someone what you're doing, for how long you're going to try it, and how you'll decide whether it worked for you.
And---key step here---then you do it. When that experiment is done, look back at your answers, pick another thing, and keep tinkering.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ellen Muehlberger

Ellen Muehlberger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @emuehlbe

4 Dec 20
Here at the end of 2020, you might be wondering: who invented the best word of the year, namely "doomscrolling"?

Friends, it was me!
And, at the same time, it wasn't me!

Pull up a chair and hear how #doomscrolling came into existence
So, Saturday, March 14: my employer, the University of Michigan, had just that week made the call to cancel in-person classes, which felt apocalyptic---UM is known for *not* canceling class, even in the worst conditions, so the U pivoting to in-person was a big shoe to drop.
That morning, my partner and I were trawling through our social media, reporting to each other what had been cancelled, and we just kept refreshing---we were slack-jawed at what was happening, and just could not stop looking for the next big cancellation.
Read 23 tweets
11 Nov 20
I've had multiple convos over the last few days w/ early career people who want to use twitter, or social in general, for visibility and networking, but are wary of stepping wrong, and I'm going to tweet here things I've said:
They're worried about Twitter's reputation for pile-ons---you know, the "Twitter mob" and getting dragged and such.
It's true: Twitter's size and immediacy mean that bad---ie, benighted, idiotic, bigoted, ill-informed, overprivileged--- tweets can experience a lot of feedback very quickly.
Read 9 tweets
10 Feb 20
This morning, I'm #_Revisiting a 2009 essay from @monicaMedHist, "Integrative Medicine: Incorporating Medicine and Health into the Canon of Medieval History," History Compass 7/4: 1218-1245

#twitterstorians #medievaltwitter #lateantiquity
It's so useful, because it does three things: first, points out a lack in the field (namely, medical history hasn't been central to "medieval history" like law or religion)--as she says, we should recognize that "pursuit of health my have *itself* been a driving force in" history
Second, it offers a diagnosis for why that's the case, noting that scholars of medieval medicine have often been doing the work of collating MSS and collecting evidence that isn't already organized in an archive---an inherency argument, so you know it went right to my heart!
Read 7 tweets
20 Oct 19
Last term, I was a part of a group of faculty across multiple disciplines in the humanities @umich that thought through the problems of harassment and abuse in graduate education
@UMich One of the primary issues---and something a bit distinct from the STEM fields---is that much of graduate advising in the humanities is a one-to-one relationship
@UMich You apply to a school, or a department, but you're applying to work with one person, whose expertise and interests overlap with yours, often in ways that seem irreplaceable---or at least very difficult to replace
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!