1/ I'm moderately concerned the Reddit Army, should it decide to choose $SLV as its next short squeeze target, may wind up causing some near term disruption to the global PV market. To be sure, global PV manufacturers are what's known as 'commercials' and as such, they...
2/ ...routinely hedge their silver exposure, just as an industrial concern hedges their future expected need for all manner of inputs, from oil to industrial metals. That's why I'm only moderately concerned. However, the chatter on WSB is very much about wanting to disrupt...
3... the physical market, by pushing the futures market into extreme territory. My general guess is the Reddit Army will find it far more challenging to disrupt the silver market. Unless of course we see a repeat, as we did last week, when much larger players got involved.
4/ Last summer, @NatBullard did a very helpful post showing that the solar sector, in its rapidly improving learning curve, is getting more efficient in its reliance on the silver input to production. Ergo, higher PV output using less silver.
5/ However, even when the learning rate of manufacturing needs fewer commodity inputs per unit of output, if a product like solar is undergoing a revolutionary growth phase (and it is) then the absolute number of inputs will still grow--alot.
6/ For example, according to the Silver Institute, the solar industry's call on silver has nearly doubled since 2014--that happens to almost perfectly correspond to the great global upwave in solar deployment. silverinstitute.org/silver-supply-…
7/ Now we come to the 2H of 2020, and the year ahead. China's solar output in Q4 of 2020 was so enormous it wiped out even the best forecasts of our best analysts. Again, there is no indication that silver was, or is, unduly pressured by this surge. In fact, it was *glass*...
8/ ...that was put under pressure last year in China. And that is its own sub-story: China policy makers spotted overcapacity in glass manufacturing and curbed its growth 24 months ago. This caused a real problem for input costs last year. reuters.com/article/china-…
9/ Zooming out to the big picture, I assume most understand global solar is taking off right now, and is expected to stomp like a giant across our world this decade. Here are best estimates of last year's jump, and this year's potential.
10/ I believe someone on Twitter asked recently: how can we expect the material inputs to global energy transition to keep going higher, while also expecting a continued learning rate in wind and solar. That's easy: absolute demand for inputs grows, while inputs per unit falls.
11/ So we can indeed expect upward price pressure on copper, lithium, rare earth metals, and yes, silver as absolute demand rises. But as someone also pointed out: those upward price pressure are the motivator to continued improvements in the learning rate. All good.
12/ But that doesn't entirely allay my concerns about, say, what a very spectacular disruption in the silver market could do. It could force commercial users to panic hedge, and hit profitability. I don't want to see that. As one of the responders to this thread suggested:
13/ Perhaps we could get the Seven Nation Reddit Army to align with the global energy transition rollout. Nice idea. Are you listening, r/wallstreetbets? /fin
Further reading and remarks:

1. Sarah Cone:
2. Jenny Chase with details on how the glass shortage developed last year in China:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gregor Macdonald

Gregor Macdonald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GregorMacdonald

17 Oct 20
Democrats currently have a single issue offered to them on a silver platter, against which Republicans are defenseless, one that would catalyze majority buy-in on the need to expand not just SCOTUS but other federal courts, and one that is clearly most pressing: Voting. 1/
Nothing is going to happen without voting modernization and liberalization. No climate policy, no health care, no gun control. Everything is downstream of voting. And it's obvious the @GOP has already made voting their own number one issue: that is, voting suppression. 2/
Perhaps there isn't clarity on how obvious this is, how voting should be the Democratic party's spearhead, because leadership is endlessly lost in the "complexity" of all the things voters and the party cares about. Look at the time wasted already on court expansion... 3/
Read 6 tweets
13 Sep 20
Chatter suddenly rising of inflation risk maps almost perfectly to this same juncture during the great recession. After the Fed showed it could put a floor under asset prices, the trumpets sounded. But, it didn't happen then, and isn't going to happen this time either. $SPY $TLT
The apex of inflation chatter will likely hit next year, when Green New Deal policies edge closer to reality. But it will just be Lucy and the Football all over again, because $GND (at least in energy-infrastructure terms) is ultimately deflationary, wringing out costs, waste.
Imagine looking back on us from the year 2120, and realizing "those people" seriously believed that investing in cheaper, faster, better, lower-cost infrastructure was both a bad investment, and...wait for it...inflationary. Can't make it up.
Read 8 tweets
20 Apr 20
Over the past two years I've been telling the story of how global oil demand growth would eventually flatten, decimating the industry. Today's oil gotterdammerung is a very different story; a macro crisis that will not as many hope deliver easy progress to the climate problem. 1/
To be sure, the massive revisions to 2020 global oil demand, if realized, will stand as a deep crater. And it'll take years for oil to slowly crawl out back to the rim. We might cautiously conclude the crisis has therefore brought the peak of demand forward, from 2025 to 2019. 2/
So in the first instance, we can pretty safely conclude that the long arc of oil's demand growth, from the first half the 20thC to the early part of the 21st, is over. It was ending anyway. For all the various reasons I and others have been writing about for years. 3/
Read 20 tweets
1 Jan 20
Over the holidays I rode around Portland on a borrowed e-bike while writing up this story for the Atlantic's @RouteFifty. One conclusion: the impact on the short-trip end of the transport spectrum could, in these early days, be comparable to EV. routefifty.com/infrastructure…
2/ If you've not yet ridden an e-bike the effects are simple enough to describe: imagine a quiet motor kicking in every time your cadence slows. You are still very much riding a bike, still pedaling. Over at @iamspecialized they say "it's you, only faster" and that sums it up.
3/Sales of e-bikes, by one estimate are on pace to rise 50% in the US this year, coming from a low base. In Europe, however, there is a more startling metric: 2018 e-bike sales were 10X EV sales. I mean, that is a full-on viking raid into the short-trips typically taken by cars.
Read 10 tweets
10 Dec 19
1/Recent lows in oil and gas equities have predictably triggered the usual flurry of articles about value or mean-reverting investors sniffing around for bargains. But I see no reason to conclude Oil & Gas is anything other now than a long-term value trap.
2/ Other than the usual price oscillations I'm not sure what Oil and Gas investors are looking for now. Another oil cycle? It's obvious the last oil cycle is well behind us now. The leading edge proxy, $OIH, never sustainably recovered after the last big oil decline. Dead sector.
3/ As 2019 comes to a close, once again we see the main forecasting agencies like EIA and IEA having spent much of the year downward revising their demand forecasts. That's getting old, frankly. IEA's STEO today also revised down 2017 + 2018 demand levels--not hugely. But, still.
Read 13 tweets
30 Jun 19
1/ China is on pace to sell 4 million fewer ICE cars this year, as a cyclical auto sector slowdown merges into real problems w/ China's economy. A thread of fresh data on oil, transport, renewables, as a mid-year update to my Oil Fall series. gum.co/OilFall
2/ Hesitate to use the crash word but China's auto market is on pace to fall by 12-13% this year. 3.5 million fewer cars in total, but 4 million fewer ICE, as EV set to reach 1.8 million new sales. This is both a cause, and concurrent to broader macro impacts on road fuel demand.
3/ The aggressive policy attack on ICE, and the surge of EV sales, are creating a perfect storm for road fuel demand as China's economy is near contraction. EV now set to even more quickly gain share in part because total car market is falling so hard.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!