The 18-page notice stated that the “impracticability or the disproportionality of the said measure cannot be decided (by) Twitter which is an intermediary bound by the orders of the Central Government” indianexpress.com/article/india/…
Govt sources told The Indian Express that “Twitter tried to push back against the order, but we've not changed anything. You can’t write that PM is carrying out a genocide on farmers & get away with it. Twitter needs to implement this. People can’t go on insulting PM like this"
हाथ कंगन को आरसी क्या, पढे लिखे को फारसी क्या ।
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How is it different from Chavhanke saying Muslims are systematically infiltrating govt machinery through UPSC? Will Supreme Court take suo motu cognizance of Pappu @RahulGandhi's unverified claim against RSS?
Many on our side & of course morons from other side are saying Pappu didn't name a community. If you see comments by SC, their main contention in stay order is "false claims on age limit/attempts for Muslims". Here Pappu is blurting nonsense without proofs
So, similarity with Pappu's nonsense against RSS & basis of order on Chavhanke remains false claims to provoke against a group of people. Stick to it. Courts need to be consistent with their judgment. Pappu's case is fit to be prosecuted. Suo motu or otherwise
Bhai log, don't laugh. Salim @_YogendraYadav himself confirms Jehadi Khalid was under surveillance for last few years. So, it's possible security agencies may have gathered tonnes of material on the Jehadi