...as predicted. Would be hilarious if the US sanctions Myanmar, India pulls out, and Myanmar hands over Sittwe to China to operate, thereby giving China a land-connected port on the other side of the Straits of Malacca. If I was China I would be hoping the US pulls the trigger
also note that Sittwe is the capital of the Rohingyas' home state, Rakhine, which means it would be ground zero for any sanctions the US imposes due to a genocide finding... and the India port/rail project is the single largest project by total FDI in that city
...and the main armed group in the region is reputed to be backed by Pakistan.
So you could theoretically see China orchestrating a deal if the Indians pull out where Rohingyas get more autonomy, Pakistan cuts ARSA support, and Myanmar redirects road/rail to Yunnan
Of course, India might be exempted from sanctions at Sittwe like it was at Chabahar, but the operational friction that US-Myanmar tensions create will probably slow down the project too much for Myanmar's liking, as it did in Iran
The major challenge for China under this scenario will be a) rapidly consolidating gains with the Tatmadaw caused by US sanctions while b) hedging and maintaining relations with the NLD such that those gains are not rolled back if they return to power
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ Once, at a reception, caught a bunch of HK girls gossiping about a mainland girl's lack of taste. "She's wearing so much Gucci. Doesn't she know that people who have been properly raised, wear Marni for casual and Valentino or Chloe for things like this?"
3/ Had a HK banker unironically tell me that "people like us are just working class, man" as he blew tens of thousands of HKD at a club.
In case it isn't blatantly obvious already, don't stick around in the US if you are Chinese and work in a STEM field - especially if you have expertise in AI, materials science, genomics, quantum physics, or any of the other 'sensitive' fields the US wants to control
No matter what, you'll be contributing to the economy of a regime that wants to keep China down, and you will likely be monitored by dedicated programs within US government agencies for the entirety of your career
Instead, you should either head back to China as soon as feasible - or stick around just long enough to get some valuable IP in your head and then leave.
Stick it to the US. Do everything you can to help China gain technological primacy.
a) Whether this is a net gain or loss for the US or China is murky
b) One thing is clear: neither the US nor China has much to gain from intervening in favor of one side or another
2/ Early reports suggest Chinese FM Wang Yi was briefed on the dispute between the Tatmadaw and ASSK's USDP somewhere between Jan 12 and Jan 14. However, this doesn't mean China supports these actions, because China has been getting along fine with the USDP for 4+ years now
3/ Indeed, since both the Tatmadaw, USDP, and numerous ethnic armies in Burma were all neutral-friendly with China, the PRC likely opposes any upheaval in Myanmar's political landscape - but is likewise not likely to lose much unless the situation further destabilizes
BTW, this permanent US "state of exception" over its own rules-based order and "right to fracture your elites at will" as the price for a given country participating in the US-led global market creates a system that requires undisputed US hard power primacy to remain stable
The US funding of current consumption via capital appreciation predicated on continued "feudal rights" of its corporates and government abroad also means US prosperity at home is at risk if the US system breaks down
This is why, in one sense, the longer telegram is accurate.
Back in 2010 I had lunch with someone whose father was in the power sector and affiliated with Li. Don't remember much except her casually saying 几个亿算啥,谁家没有几个亿啊 in a conversation about the price of Australian real estate
This is why that longer telegram makes no sense to me. The CPC was rotting from the inside pre 2013 and everyone with power inside it could see the end was nigh if they continued down that course
1/ The Robinhood CEO's statement on why they limited the purchase of $GME and other stocks caught in the recent short squeeze is misleading. Here is proof:
2/ Here is a screencap from a chat group of Chinese Robinhood employees. One of them notes that Robinhood is nowhere close to exceeding its OCC margin requirements, even with the elevated trading volumes and price volatility in the securities Robinhood restricted...
3/ One of them then notes that this fact is a 'company secret' and a third then notes that 'if the cash is sufficient [for the margin requrements] then the situation will be awkward'.