I know that the term misinformation is unbelievably overused at this point, but this is legitimately misinformation.
There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that anything that California did made any difference at all. This story is indefensible and dangerously misleading.
Hospitalizations in Arizona and California peaked at nearly the exact same time. Arizona never banned outdoor dining or had another stay at home order.
And crucially, in the period (12/20-1/6) where CA’s interventions would make a supposed difference, there was none.
Saying that the measures in California worked is just an outright lie. I would say that it’s incomprehensible that a supposedly reputable newspaper would publish this nonsense, but it’s the modern media, so…it actually makes perfect sense they would publish this nonsense
And I forgot to mention this, but the 14-day average of cases in California peaked on 1/17, literally 42 days after their stay at home order.
LA closed outdoor dining even earlier, on 11/25 so it took 53 days to work after the biggest city and Covid “epicenter” closed dining
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The messaging on masks, as they’ve continued to fail, has changed from “the most important thing” to “only one part"
LA is on ~10 months of masks, no indoor dining for 7 months, no theme parks, schools or movie theaters for ~11 months, etc.
Deaths still went up 1048% since 4/10
So again, if any of these multi-faceted Covid responses actually worked, wouldn’t we expect to see them work at some point?
Wouldn’t closing indoor dining, outdoor dining, closing movie theaters, bars, gyms, schools, stay at home orders or universal masking actually work?
What about banning all large gatherings, banning all private gatherings, closing offices, restricting retail capacity to 20%, banning all travel, including by foot…closing wet sand on beaches, shouldn’t any of this make a difference, if it actually matters?
Here’s a thread on episode 10 million of modeling failure & the experts & media who never face any criticism for inaccuracy & fear mongering
Today’s episode is Arizona!
First, let’s check the headlines. Both the ASU & U of A modeling groups predicted disaster by late December
Here’s some text from the ASU modeling projection
“The amount of people specifically in hospital ICUs is also projected to reach record-breaking numbers under every projection”
“Hospitals in Arizona and Maricopa County may become over capacity”
The University of Arizona modeling team went further, calling for a shelter in place order and immediate implementation of a statewide mask mandate because hospitals would reach total capacity by “late December” and have no available hospital beds
Slovakia has been hailed by outlets like The Atlantic for their Covid response, mostly because they mandated masks extremely early and their leaders “led by example” by wearing them
Wonder if we’ll see any updates now that their rates have exploded? Somehow I doubt it!
Oh and even more recently, a study in the UK said mass testing in Slovakia cut the infection rate by 60%. Literally a few days after they published, infections rose again and are now higher than they’ve ever been
Los Angeles County reported over 22,400 new cases today, one of the highest numbers reported by any STATE during the entire outbreak
Cases are up 2269% since the initial mask mandate &
349% since they put in a curfew & closed outdoor dining
None of this works. None of it.
I know that the mask cult will always say it would have been worse without masks, but a 2,269% increase is uh…bad.
The recent case curve is literally a straight line up. It cannot get worse than that.
I do not know how you could do worse than the combination of some of the worst Covid rates in the world, economic destruction, and massive restrictions on freedom and liberty than what LA has done in 2020.
It is a masterpiece of incompetence that only LA could achieve
So the BBC, with an assist from some professional misinformation specialists in universities, has gotten into the mask lies spreading game, with an atrocious article saying masks worked in Brookings County, South Dakota compared to others in SD
Here’s a thread on how they lied
They chose to start on 9/1, because they got to ignore that Brookings saw a huge increase throughout August. Starting from 8/1 shows the month long growth
At peak on 9/7 Brookings had a case rate 242% higher than Minnehaha, on 11/30 Minnehaha was only 62% higher than Brookings
They also ignored that cases were already on the way down before the mandate & the decline actually stopped and starting going up 2 weeks after the mandate
No explanation for why it wasn’t until early November that Brookings did better, and still had the highest rate in October