#BlackHistoryMonth Spotlight of #BlackSeminole John Horse (Juan Cavallo/Caballo). John Horse is best known for bravely escaping an “impenetrable” and “inescapable” St. Augustine fort, and for uniting Seminoles in the Second Seminole War. He and other Seminoles beat the US army.
Black and non-Black Seminoles were decimating the US Army, so the US Army presented a false flag of truce to Seminole Chief Osceola, and under this false truce, the US Army kidnapped Osceola and some of his closest confidants, including Juan Cavallo (John Horse), his translator.
They locked them into Fort Marion (Castillo de San Marcos) in St Augustine, FL. This fort was considered impenetrable and unbreachable. However, John Horse and Wildcat, the son of a Seminole Chief, united and escaped from the inescapable fort. John Horse and Wildcat then united
the remaining Seminole bands and continued fighting against American forces that were attempting to enslave Black Seminoles and remove non-Black Seminoles to Indian Territory. In Spring of 1838, after being promised emancipation for all Black Seminoles who fought in the Second
Seminole War (Jesup’s Proclamation), John Horse surrendered to US troops. Jesup’s Proclamation promised that all escaped slaves who had fought with the Seminoles and their children would be freed from slavery due to them fighting for their freedom. Horse was also granted
secondary freedom from General William J. Worth due to working as a translator and scout for the US Army in the Second Seminole War after surrendering. Black Natives’ abilities to be multilingual in their Native languages and English proved very useful in this case.
His second wife (he was polygamous, but his first wife died in the Second Seminole War) and his children were only freed by Jesup’s Proclamation, and not the official order by Worth. However, he and his family, as well as other Black Seminoles were removed west of the Mississippi
River as FREED people based on them fighting for their own freedom (Jesup’s Proclamation). With other Seminole, Horse was shipped across the Gulf of Mexico from Tampa Bay to New Orleans and north from there by way of the Mississippi to Indian Territory in present-day Oklahoma.
However, slave catchers in Indian Territory were relentless, so he and his family were always at risk of reenslavement. Further, he was enslaved by his own Seminole father, and because the Seminole Nation is its own sovereign nation, declarations of freedom in the United States
had no legal bearing on his or his family’s freedom in the Seminole Nation. In 1843, the main chief of the Seminole Nation, Micanopy had nominal ownership over him. Micanopy and his council finally granted the John Horse his freedom from any claims of enslavement against him in
the Seminole Nation. John Horse had thus been freed from enslavement three times in two jurisdictions, while his wife Susan and their children were only freed by Jesup’s Proclamation in the United States. John Horse and his family lived in territory that was under the dominion of
the Muscogee Creek Nation in Indian Territory and as a tribe intrenched in chattel slave ownership based on African ancestry, factions of the Muscogee Creek Nation began raising free Black Seminole townships and reenslaving free Black Seminoles. These slave catchers reenslaved
and kidnapped veterans of the Second Seminole War like a man named Factor. John Horse stood against this raiding of free Black Seminoles who fought for their own freedom. John Horse then traveled twice to Washington, DC to advocate for Seminoles (including free Black Seminoles)
First, he argued that Seminoles should have a separate land grant from Muscogee Creeks, arguing that Seminoles gs been a separate people for at least 100 years, however this plea did not work. He then lobbied General Jesup (who had made the proclamation of emancipation) asking
him to uphold his promises made in the Proclamation. Jesup then arranged for the construction of facilities at Fort Gibson and arranged for US Army protections for Black Seminoles who had surrendered and were thus freed. Tensions continued to rise, however, and there was even
an assassination attempt against John Horse thought to have been conducted by a pro-Creek faction of the Seminole Nation. Under President James K. Polk, Jesup’s Proclamation was suddenly revoked, as the Attorney General argues that it illegally deprived Seminole slave owners of
their human property. This out 280 Black Seminoles at risk of re-enslavement, including John Horse’s own family. US agents and Seminole leaders directed John Horse to bring these freed Black Seminoles from Fort Gibson to a site to be reenslaved. However, John Horse led this
Black Seminole group on an exodus to Wewoka (named by Horse) and he and fellow Black Seminoles set up their defenses against the Creek, Seminole, and Cherokee enslavers who were attempting to reenslave them. John Horse made a plan w/ his old friend Wildcat (non-Black Seminole)
and they made a mass escape with fellow Black and non-Black Seminoles across the Red River into Texas in the dead of night. Among the escapees were women and children. They migrated south through Texas for about a year, fighting off Texas Rangers, bounty hunters, and enslavers.
They eventually joined forces with a band of Kickapoo and had a battle against some Comanches. Eventually, they ferried across the Rio Grande River as they were being followed by Texas Rangers and bounty hunters, but they finally made it to Mexico.
There, in return for a pledge to fight all invaders and raiding parties from Texas, they were given land for their people and captaincies in the Mexican army on or about July 12, 1850. Mexico’s Black President Guerrero had abolished slavery in 1829, so they were all finally free.
Thank you to @ProenzaColes for pointing us to this website. It includes many sources, including interactive maps and photos about John Horse and the Black Seminoles. JohnHorse.com
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just because someone’s family lived as a legally white person for generations, it does not mean that they are not Indigenous. Non-Black members of the Five Slaveholding Tribes we’re legally reclassified as white in 1908 and we’re legally treated that way for generations.
Does this mean all of our non-Black members are not actually Native? Of course not! Their reclassification as white Americans was part of settler colonialism and was a central part of redistributing land and creating anti-Black legal codes.
Freedmen were also reclassified legally as “Negro/Black,” no matter what languages they spoke, their parentage, etc. This doesn’t mean our ancestors were “pretendians” nor does it mean we—their descendants are either. The point of allotment & Jim Crow was to erase our Indigeneity
In this video @EliGrayson8, @MvskokeRez citizen, breaks down why he supports Deb Haaland’s nomination & believes that she must acknowledge Freedmen on record. He emphasizes the importance of acknowledging Freedmen & McGirt to uphold sovereignty & treaties.
“I am not in opposition to Deb Haaland’s nomination... because she is going to be the first Indigenous person to head the Department of Interior, she should be the first one to step in and do what’s right by the Freedmen because the treaties are important”
Sign our petition that calls on @DebHaalandNM to publicly support the 1866 Treaty rights of Freedmen of the Five Tribes in her position as Secretary of the Interior.
Congresswoman @DebHaalandNM, we humbly ask you to please address the ongoing discrimination and disenfranchisement that Freedmen of the Five Slaveholding Tribes are currently facing within our tribes. You must stand up against anti-Black racism and uphold our treaty rights.
Our petition asking you to please formulate and implement a plan for full integration and equality in the Five Slaveholding Tribes currently has over 17,000 signatures. This is a completely grassroots and unpaid campaign on our part. We have raised awareness about our issues.
And over 17,000 people have felt passionate enough about the disgrace of our discrimination to sign our petition. We ask you to please address our concerns and right this wrong. Our ancestors were emancipated from chattel slavery over 150 years ago. We shouldn’t still be treated
Did you know that Freedmen of the Chickasaw, Choctaw, and Creek Nations could be fined up to $250,000 and could face up to 5 years in federal prison for creating traditional arts and crafts and selling them with our tribal labels or with Native labels? We are not able to
equally practice our traditional crafts or traditional ways, from arts and crafts (such as basket weaving, beading, quilt making, mat weaving, and bow making) to fishing and hunting, due to our ancestors’ African ancestry. This is one of the consequences of tribal Jim Crow laws.
These are some of the most fundamental rights that are afforded to Indigenous peoples, but because our tribes discriminate against us in seeking tribal citizenship, we are unable to equally participate in cultural ways and activities. #NoJimCrowInIndianTerritory
I’m not sure why we should have any hope for white supremacists who commit violence today being held accountable when we still haven’t even held white supremacist terrorists who committed violence in the past accountable. No one has been charged for the Tulsa Race Massacre.
Almost none of the individuals who participated in lynchings have been charged (even those who are still living). Most of the time we are expected to just accept an apology for such violence, as if the people who participated in this racist violence didn’t know any better.
Well they did know better. They knew they were harming human beings, but they didn’t care. And our justice system’s apathy to this—even now, when these perpetrators are still alive and we have nationally acknowledged that lynchings happened and were evil—speaks volumes.
For generations, white and Native historians claimed that Native slave-owners from the Five Tribes were less violent than white slave owners. The story of Lucy, a Black enslaved woman owned by a Choctaw master who was BURNED ALIVE by her female Choctaw owner disproves this myth.
In 1858 an enslaved man named Prince confessed to the murder of his master Richard Harkins. He claimed he had killed him with an axe to his head—transforming a tool of his forced labor to a weapon to end the life of his abusive enslaver. After Prince murdered Harkins,
he used a rope to a tie a rock to Harkins’s body and drowned him in a river. When he confessed under probable torture he “named” his accomplices, including his Aunt Lucy who he claimed urged him to kill Harkins for some time and even taught him how to tie the rope around his dead