Buried at the bottom of @TeamHawley email that went out earlier is January fundraising figures. These contributions will be in the April report. But the crux is that as corporate PACs ask for refunds after Jan. 6, Hawley’s campaign is reporting increase in small dollars
This dovetails with the polling data that showed Hawley’s favorability drop in Missouri, but increase among Republicans nationally after the riot google.com/amp/s/amp.kans…
Hawley’s FEC report showed a pair of Dec. 31 contribs from Hallmark’s PAC, but we dug into it and if you look at Hallmark PAC’s report they were made in September & October. The Dec. 31 date represents a transfer from Hawley’s joint fundraising cmte.
Missouri Scout had a poll that didn’t show the same drop at home, but when in doubt go with @eyokley
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The holdup in passing the Senate organizing resolution doesn't just delay the handoff of cmte chairs from R's to D's. It also means new members, including Kansas freshman @RogerMarshallMD, don't have any cmte assignments yet.
Marshall tweeted about a Zoom meeting with Vilsack and has clearly been operating under the assumption that he'll get a seat on Senate Ag (a big part of his campaign). But we don't actually know that until the organizing resolution passes.
I made a reference to the fact that Marshall is currently in cmte limbo in this story about Blunt and Moran handing over their chairmanships. kansascity.com/news/politics-…
Cory Bliss, who ran Pat Roberts' 2014 campaign, quoted here: “If you want to spend all your time going on Fox and be[ing] an asshole, there’s never been a better time to serve.“
Bliss continues: “But if you want to spend all your time being thoughtful and getting shit done, there’s never been a worse time to serve.”
Both Blunt and Moran, who are generally known for being thoughtful and getting stuff done but are also up in 2022, voted to table Trump's impeachment today. kansascity.com/news/politics-…
Hawley in April of 2017: I am working very hard at the job people elected me to do. It is far too early to be thinking about any future election with so much pressing work to do.” He formed an exploratory cmte in August of 2017 and announced in October stltoday.com/news/local/gov…
In other words, maybe a story about a politician saying they're not running for X position doesn't warrant siren symbols when it's almost four years out. All due respect to the good people at @businessinsider. Some of us have just been thru a round of this before.
And I wrote some of those will he/won't he stories in 2017. I often reflect on how I should have been more skeptical of the reluctant politician storyline kansascity.com/news/politics-…
I mentioned on here the other week that before the Capitol riot I was working on a story about what the loss of chairmanships would mean for KC. This is that story. First spoke to @RoyBlunt and @JerryMoran's staffs about it that morning. kansascity.com/news/politics-…
That morning feels like a different universe. Story was conceived after the GA runoff results, but the Capitol attack has given new emphasis on the importance of cross-aisle cooperation.
With that in mind, here's a @RoyBlunt story that didn't make into this story. But which I find pretty interesting. Blunt was one of the people pushing for Congress to resume voting that night after the riot.
ICYMI former Sen. John Danforth, who mentored Hawley, continues his media penance tour where he voices regret for his role in clearing Hawley's path to the Senate msnbc.com/the-last-word/…
The cracks in this relationship had started to show in late 2018 when Hawley was touring the state with Trump. Danforth, who was a Trump critics, at the time chalked it up to political expediency on Hawley's part and still maintained that Hawley would be an excellent senator.
.@HawleyMO's team has repeatedly ignored requests for comment since Wednesday as his political mentor and donors disavow him and his colleagues call for his resignation. But he's happy to go on Tucker.
Tucker's analysis that publishers rather than lawmakers are the guardians of the First Amendment also may set some First Amendment lawyers' heads to spin. Publishers are protected by the First Amendment. It doesn't require them to publish a senator's words.