This is extremely bullish: private blockchains a la IBM are a technological dead end.
coindesk.com/ibm-blockchain… via @CoinDesk
This isn't good for Hyperledger.

And it doesn't mean that the solution lies in public blockchains. All of the reasons why people wanted private blockchains saree still there. It's just that private chains clearly have too many downsides to pose a viable solution.
Not a single one of the private blockchain solutions that people have worked on has been deployed in a mission critical setting. The reasons are obvious. Private chains are:
- closed deadends
- don't integrate with exchanges, AMMs, etc
- consortia fall apart quickly
But at the same time, public chains:
- have unpredictable fees
- exhibit delays and lackadaisical performance
- do not provide full control over asset lifecycle
This is why @avalancheavax offers a different model, where people can do deployments in between fully private consortia chains and fully public networks.
On Avalanche, one can create "subnetworks" where the criteria for joining the network are up to the creator. Make them limited to a whitelist, and you have private blockchains. Make them non-existent, and you have public chains.

But there are interesting points in between.
For instance, you can create subnetworks where the required hardware to run a node are higher than normal. You can then run your chain at a faster speed. Or enable your smart contracts to use much more storage. No need for a blocksize debate when you can just create a subnet.
If needed, you can ask that all nodes participating in your subnet sign a legal agreement. Now you have legal recourse going all the way to nodes, and the expected behavior of the system is fully defined. If your contact has a bug, how it gets fix it is under your control.
Or if your application has to abide by the GDPR or other data privacy laws, you can create a subnetwork where the nodes agree to abide by data privacy mandates.
Best of all, subnets can pair with other subnets. You can connect your private subnet into mine, because they all speak the same underlying, unifying Avalanche protocol. And when needed, we can hook subnets up to the public Avalanche network, and use DEXes and similar infra.
Overall, the world no longer consists of public and private blockchains, but instead, of a continuum between the two. There's a rich space of possibilities that Avalanche offers.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emin Gün Sirer

Emin Gün Sirer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @el33th4xor

17 Mar
The Avalanche C-Chain is continuing to burn $AVAX at a fairly rapid clip, having crossed the $1m line recently. It's a good time to reflect on the underlying dynamic. (Thread)
A lot of the burn is attributable to DEXes, including @pangolindex, @SushiSwap and @Zer0Dex. These DEXes share a common feature: they constantly offer to buy and sell assets using the Uniswap equation. They are censorship free, and make a market for any asset.
By construction, these DEXes operate constantly provide arbitrage opportunities as prices move. Their bid/ask prices are modified continuously, by anyone, to reflect the market consensus on the price of the assets.

These updates all consume $AVAX as gas.
Read 7 tweets
19 Feb
Today’s #FreeLoveFriday is about a topic that has been seeing a lot of discussion recently. Namely, I want to talk about Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) in general, and to make it specific, I’ll focus on CryptoKitties.

First of all, there is the impression that NFTs were invented on Ethereum and that the Bitcoin community is just now getting in on the NFT game. This is not actually how it happened.
The very first NFTs were invented and issued on Bitcoin, by layering them on top of Bitcoin transactions. Among the most notable were NFTs centered around Pepe The Frog. I will leave dissecting the social aspect of Rare Pepes alone and focus on the technical side of NFTs.
Read 23 tweets
13 Feb
The Avalanche network experienced a slowdown yesterday. I want to provide a short update on what happened, with a full analysis to be provided next week.
The Pangolin launch generated enormous activity, as I’m sure you’ve already heard. This activity triggered a nondeterministic bug in the network layer, related to caches, that led to a block validity check being skipped.
As a result, 57 X-chain to C-chain coin mint transactions were not subject to requisite checking in the client. This led to invalid minting of ~790.2 AVAX, corresponding to ~$40k USD, on the C-chain. It also caused the network to slow down. Nothing else was affected.
Read 10 tweets
29 Jan
Another #FreeLoveFriday. So far, I’ve covered Bitcoin, Mastercoin/Omni, and last week ChainLink and the importance of decentralized oracles. Today, let’s talk about one of the most fascinating projects in crypto - @MakerDAO
In my thread about Mastercoin, I briefly touched on the vital role fiat-backed stablecoins play in crypto markets, but there’s a catch with them:

The counterparty risk of a third-party holding fiat in reserves.
Enter MakerDAO, which set out to create a decentralized, collateral-backed cryptocurrency, DAI, that would be “soft-pegged” to the U.S. Dollar using the power of algorithms. In crypto tradition, its supporters said trust game theory, not operators.
Read 15 tweets
28 Jan
Important reminder about @RobinhoodApp's past track record.
Robinhood has a history of failing to provide "best execution" to their clients. In essence, they let hedge funds like Citadel and others front-run the orders from retail, costing millions to the retail investors.
Are DEXes better? Undoubtedly. But DEXes on slow PoW chains like ETH1 just don't cut it, because they allow miners to front-run the orderflow.
hackernoon.com/front-running-…
Read 4 tweets
22 Jan
Back with another #FreeLoveFriday. Last time, we covered how Mastercoin/@Omni_Layer pioneered digital asset issuance on blockchains. Today, let’s discuss @Chainlink and the vital role it plays in connecting blockchains to the real world.
I have said repeatedly that digital asset issuance is the killer application for blockchains. The next frontier is bringing real world assets to networks like @AvalancheAVAX, but we often face a significant problem:
Namely, how do you get data from the real world onto blockchains and into applications running on them? More critically, how do you achieve that securely and transparently in real-time? Smart contracts are tamper-proof, but they're only as reliable as their input data.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!