The Avalanche C-Chain is continuing to burn $AVAX at a fairly rapid clip, having crossed the $1m line recently. It's a good time to reflect on the underlying dynamic. (Thread)
A lot of the burn is attributable to DEXes, including @pangolindex, @SushiSwap and @Zer0Dex. These DEXes share a common feature: they constantly offer to buy and sell assets using the Uniswap equation. They are censorship free, and make a market for any asset.
By construction, these DEXes operate constantly provide arbitrage opportunities as prices move. Their bid/ask prices are modified continuously, by anyone, to reflect the market consensus on the price of the assets.
These updates all consume $AVAX as gas.
It's this mechanism that's burning fees continuously and creating natural, organic demand for $AVAX. It's beautiful to watch.
These DEXes have amazing properties -- open to all, censorship proof, continuously provide liquidity, etc -- but one thing they are not is gas efficient. Volatility in the markets leads to updates to DEX prices, which then creates demand for the platform token, in this case $AVAX
This is good for $AVAX holders.
Interestingly, the fact that fees are burned in Avalanche is incredibly nice. Environment-destroying Nakamoto consensus rewards fees to miners, who then have to sell their coins to cover their OPEX, creating downwards pressure on price.
Burning fees in Avalanche creates a virtuous cycle that benefits all coin holders.
And it sure feels nice to use a modern protocol, based on sound science. Hope you all enjoy the system.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today’s #FreeLoveFriday is about a topic that has been seeing a lot of discussion recently. Namely, I want to talk about Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) in general, and to make it specific, I’ll focus on CryptoKitties.
First of all, there is the impression that NFTs were invented on Ethereum and that the Bitcoin community is just now getting in on the NFT game. This is not actually how it happened.
The very first NFTs were invented and issued on Bitcoin, by layering them on top of Bitcoin transactions. Among the most notable were NFTs centered around Pepe The Frog. I will leave dissecting the social aspect of Rare Pepes alone and focus on the technical side of NFTs.
The Avalanche network experienced a slowdown yesterday. I want to provide a short update on what happened, with a full analysis to be provided next week.
The Pangolin launch generated enormous activity, as I’m sure you’ve already heard. This activity triggered a nondeterministic bug in the network layer, related to caches, that led to a block validity check being skipped.
As a result, 57 X-chain to C-chain coin mint transactions were not subject to requisite checking in the client. This led to invalid minting of ~790.2 AVAX, corresponding to ~$40k USD, on the C-chain. It also caused the network to slow down. Nothing else was affected.
And it doesn't mean that the solution lies in public blockchains. All of the reasons why people wanted private blockchains saree still there. It's just that private chains clearly have too many downsides to pose a viable solution.
Not a single one of the private blockchain solutions that people have worked on has been deployed in a mission critical setting. The reasons are obvious. Private chains are:
- closed deadends
- don't integrate with exchanges, AMMs, etc
- consortia fall apart quickly
Another #FreeLoveFriday. So far, I’ve covered Bitcoin, Mastercoin/Omni, and last week ChainLink and the importance of decentralized oracles. Today, let’s talk about one of the most fascinating projects in crypto - @MakerDAO
In my thread about Mastercoin, I briefly touched on the vital role fiat-backed stablecoins play in crypto markets, but there’s a catch with them:
The counterparty risk of a third-party holding fiat in reserves.
Enter MakerDAO, which set out to create a decentralized, collateral-backed cryptocurrency, DAI, that would be “soft-pegged” to the U.S. Dollar using the power of algorithms. In crypto tradition, its supporters said trust game theory, not operators.
Important reminder about @RobinhoodApp's past track record.
Robinhood has a history of failing to provide "best execution" to their clients. In essence, they let hedge funds like Citadel and others front-run the orders from retail, costing millions to the retail investors.
Are DEXes better? Undoubtedly. But DEXes on slow PoW chains like ETH1 just don't cut it, because they allow miners to front-run the orderflow. hackernoon.com/front-running-…
Back with another #FreeLoveFriday. Last time, we covered how Mastercoin/@Omni_Layer pioneered digital asset issuance on blockchains. Today, let’s discuss @Chainlink and the vital role it plays in connecting blockchains to the real world.
I have said repeatedly that digital asset issuance is the killer application for blockchains. The next frontier is bringing real world assets to networks like @AvalancheAVAX, but we often face a significant problem:
Namely, how do you get data from the real world onto blockchains and into applications running on them? More critically, how do you achieve that securely and transparently in real-time? Smart contracts are tamper-proof, but they're only as reliable as their input data.