Any woman can be subjected to a man’s or men’s violence. We know that class, race, disability, sexuality, any of the differences between women, differences which are often turned in to inequalities do not provide an impenetrable barrier;
though they do present more exposure to or protection from some forms of violence.
Any woman should be able to access specialist support for women who have been subjected to sexual and domestic violence and abuse, including prostitution.
We also know that women of means may have alternatives to those services, e.g. it’s rare you find a woman in refuge, who could afford to book herself into a hotel, or who have access to friends with space. She has choices. Many women in refuges do not. Women in prison do not.
Most women in prison have been subjected to far greater crimes than those they were incarcerated for, crimes against them for which the perpetrator never served time, was never held to account by the woefully patriarchal criminal justice system.
It strikes me that many of the women who are demanding access for trans identified males to women only specialist services, are not those who have no other choice.
I would love to do a class analysis of those who angrily ally themselves with trans activism rather than their sisters who have been abused by men and carry the psychological scars.
Who are those women who choose not to be amongst those who recognise the importance and value of women only space, whether or not this is primarily a result of their own experience of men’s violence and abuse, or their ability to empathise with women who need it?
Far from offering hope to your sisters, you offer the denial of help. As someone who has been immersed for over 3 decades in supporting women recovering from men’s violence, I tell you, you offer a door that is closed because they need that which you glibly give away.
Fine, you may not need women-only specialist services for women who have been subjected to men’s violence for yourself. But do not try to deny it of your sisters who do
Fight for services for males, including those who identify as women by all means, but do so without turning in pariahs those of us who recognise the needs of abused women. I choose to prioritise women, you do not have to, but I and many others will not let you disregard us.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Karen Ingala Smith

Karen Ingala Smith Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @K_IngalaSmith

1 Feb
I see those trying to deprive women victim-survivors of sexual and domestic violence and abuse, including prostitution, of their legal right to single-sex services from specialist independent organisations have come out to play again.
Firstly - it is perfectly straightforward and contains no contradictions to support universal human rights AND sex based rights and protections - and in doing so to prioritise the well-being of women, particularly those who have been subjected to men's violence.
I have made no secret of my belief in the importance of single-sex services for women who've been subjected to men's violence - but don't listen to what other people say I say, read what I say myself for yourself (if you're interested). Links follow.
Read 12 tweets
22 Sep 20
It’s absolutely true that the scrapping of self-ID is the work of hundreds, no, thousands of ordinary women fighting to retain rights for our sisters.
But I personally would like to say thank you to @bindelj who stood practically alone against the threat of transgender ideology
for such a long time.
Secondly to @Womans_Place_UK who took up the mantel for those of us who wanted to address the issue within the context of broader structural inequalities and whose support and sisterhood gave me determination to speak out.
Thirdly to @nia_endingVAWG’s board of trustees who gave me the permission to speak out as CEO because they recognised the threat to specialist women’s services and made the issue a strategic aim for nia; and to nia’s staff & senior management team for everything they do for women
Read 4 tweets
20 Sep 20
This is but a stepping stone.

However...

To the women (and men) who made this happen, whether or not we agree on broader feminist or other political ideals: Thank you. thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/c…
To those with whom I share broader feminist & political ideals, but who have stayed silent on the threat of transgender ideology to women’s rights & protections: many of us will neither forget nor forgive your silence (particularly for me,those with a purported interest in MVAWG)
To people who identify as transgender and their allies, I support universal human rights, including yours.
Read 4 tweets
9 Sep 20
Penis news have run a piece trashing me for defending refuges etc as single-sex services.

For anyone temped to respond to me

Here's a piece I wrote on trauma informed services for women subjected to after men's violence

kareningalasmith.com/2020/07/08/tra…
He's a speech I gave earlier this year (remember pre-lockdown anyone?) about the importance of women only services for women and girls subjected to men's violence

kareningalasmith.com/2020/01/20/the…
And while I'm at it, here's another about why i decided to keep Counting Dead Women @CountDeadWomen women only kareningalasmith.com/2019/07/27/cou…
Read 4 tweets
8 Sep 20
On another platform this morning, a bunch of women were discussing menopause and peri-menopause, the OP was specifically about how the issue was still taboo and neglected.
Cue a younger woman turning up and proclaiming that framing menopause as a women's issue is transphobic.
I am bloody sick of this. (Of course not just for this reason).
Women were discussing a major life event for almost all women and a challenging one for many of us, and another woman (of course significantly younger), in a feminist forum, makes it about males.
Newsflash
Women talking about our bodies is not transphobic.
Males do not have periods.
Males do not experience menopause and peri-menopause.
Silencing women talking about our bodies is misogynistic.
Deflecting attention away from women talking about our bodies is patriarchal
Read 5 tweets
10 Jul 20
Just sorted out a route to ride with a colleague from nia for tomorrow's Ride For Murdered Women. So grateful to see those of you planning to take part. Thank you.
If you can't ride but you would like to donate, you can do so here justgiving.com/fundraising/je…
The funds shown as raised is the incredible running total from @JeanHatchet's work in riding to commemorate women who have been killed by men and in doing so to raise funds for nia to help women escape violent and abusive men.#RideForMurderedWomen
This thread, instigated by Jean, is women in their own words describing what being in a relationship with an abuser felt like and did to them. It breaks my heart to read it.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!