Note: Gove (and the UK Government) can only get away with this because it is only about Northern Ireland, and v few Tory backbenchers really care about NI.
The EU response should be seen in this context - Gove is losing *no* political capital by announcing this.
Note: this is no comment on what *should* happen, but a comment on the politics of this, UK side.
This also should not be seen as a template for any sort of grace periods for the rest of the UK - because for that to happen Tory backbenchers *will* scream.
This is of course a rather inevitable development - the UK was *not* ready for the implications of Brexit on Northern Ireland, as pretty much every expert pointed out. And it is better to acknowledge this than be in a state of permanent denial.
So what should the EU do?
The proposals are sensible. So agree, unconditionally?
Or make it clear to the UK that these changes have to happen, and propose some rolling 3 month system?
An outright rejection - although it might be good for the told-you-so brigade - would almost literally be playing with fire, so ought to be avoided
I wonder if there is anything the EU could (should?) ask for in return, to make a min-deal of this?
/ends
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🇪🇺 sees the reality of how checks are going to have to work - for both sides - and sees any slippage of timetables as a problem. If 🇬🇧 cannot meet the 1 July deadline - just like any Brexit deadline - the question is *WHEN* it can, not *IF* it can or will
2/10
🇬🇧 sees it differently. Complying is costly and onerous, requires IT systems, sites for checks, and training of staff - so it pays lip service to complying, but keeps it vague as to how and when it will comply - the Government does not actually *DO* the necessary
58 locations of really nerdy EU stuff - places were Treaties were signed, places where EU institutions and agencies are located
And these are not *just* EU institution buildings in Brussels. That'd be too boring...
If any of these locations are wrong, or there are places you think I should add (I have only 3 that relate to historical people in the EU - if you know where someone was born or buried that would be excellent)
The European Commission has messed up its approach and comms on AstraZeneca. It could (should?) have done better.
But - I’m sorry - this is what you get with von der Leyen. She looks like she wants to take action, and goes ahead without fully considering the consequences.
This is what you get in any politics: there are good politicians, bad ones, ones with skills for some situations that then don’t work in other situations.
vdL’s approach worked better for Brexit than it did for AstraZeneca.
We should not assume the behaviour of European Commissioners is any different to that of national politicians. Politics is not a meritocracy.
And German followers of mine would do well to pay attention to it
1/14
Don't worry. I have not lost my mind
I'd prefer a UK passport gave me rights to live freely in the whole of the EU (it doesn't) and what colour it is doesn't bother me in the slightest. I can put it in a @PulseofEurope case anyway 😜
2/14
The story is about how the passport renewal was handled
And how fantastically good it was
Really I am not joking
This is how government-citizen relations should be
Handelsblatt has a further story about AstraZeneca up where they *stick to the line* from yesterday evening that caused all the fuss. There is some more detail in this one: handelsblatt.com/politik/deutsc…
Please, as before, treat this with care.
And also please don't just go "they used the number from some other part of the report" - it is possible the numbers are still wrong, but this piece now explains where the numbers are from.
And when EMA approves (or partially approves, or does not approve) the AZ vaccine on Friday we are going to know more.