Our new median justice, Brett Kavanaugh, casts the fifth vote with Roberts and the liberals in a 5–4 decision about the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974. First time we've seen this split. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf… 
Barrett joins the Supreme Court's hard-core conservatives in her first 5–4 split, siding with Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch to say that the Railroad Retirement Board's refusal to reopen the prior denial of benefits is NOT subject to judicial review. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
But Sotomayor—joined by Roberts, Kavanaugh, Breyer, and Kagan—won this round, holding that the Railroad Retirement Board's refusal to reopen the prior denial of benefits IS subject to judicial review. Let's chalk this up to a liberal victory; there won't be many more, maybe ever!
The final two decisions from SCOTUS today do not involve the hot-button controversies you are worried about, but it's going to take me a second to digest the holding; it's about heirs of Holocaust victims trying to sue Germany over stolen art: supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
OK, SCOTUS unanimously rules that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act does NOT allow heirs of Holocaust victims to sue Germany over stolen art, though it leaves the door cracked open to other claims. Opinion by Roberts. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
I think this is pretty obviously correct. SCOTUS wanted to get these cases off its plate; the opinions were complete, and the court doesn't "sit" IRL these days, so the justices decided to drop them online during the long break.
https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1356986256526356484
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
