Capitol riot was four weeks ago. Still much we don't know. Yes, can piece together this and that from various sources, but Capitol Police quiet on some basic facts of the investigation. 1/7 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-…
Questions I submitted to Capitol Police: How many Capitol Police officers were injured in riot? What were their injuries? Their condition? Did Capitol Police confiscate any firearms from rioters? If so, how many, what types? 2/7 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-…
What is status of investigation into killing of Officer Sicknick? Is there an autopsy report for Officer Sicknick? If so, will it be released to public, or will its key findings be released to public? 3/7 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-…
What is status of investigation into shooting of Ashli Babbitt? Has it been ruled a justifiable shooting? Who was officer who shot Babbitt? (There was an anonymous leak this week that he won't be charged.) 4/7 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-…
Did any other officers discharge firearms during rioting? If so, under what circumstances? Did any rioters discharge any firearms during rioting? If so, under what circumstances? 5/7 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-…
No response from Capitol Police. And it is by no means a comprehensive list of questions. But it covers the sort of basic information Capitol Police should have already released. 6/7 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-…
It's important because Capitol riot will be important factor in our politics for a long time. Will be foundation of impeachment case against Trump. Will be subject of big investigations. And there are many basic facts we should know but don't. 7/7 End. washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Jonathan Turley asks: Why hasn't the House held hearings on the impeachment charge against former President Trump? Why hasn't it sought to gather and present evidence to the public for its article of 'incitement to insurrection'? 1/6 jonathanturley.org/2021/01/30/why…
Yes, it's getting things backwards to hold hearings after impeachment vote, rather than before. But Speaker Pelosi has thrown out all the other rules when it comes to impeaching Trump. Why not post-impeachment hearings? 2/6
You could say the House is saving its case for the Senate trial. But why? It shouldn't be a surprise. Should public be able to hear, read, absorb information in time leading up to trial? Of course. That's how House did it in first Trump impeachment, BTW. 3/6
Schumer argues late impeachment must go ahead because if not, a president could commit crime, quickly resign, and bingo! -- immune from impeachment. Future president will commit heinous crime, immediately quit, and get away scot free. 1/4 washingtonpost.com/politics/gop-s…
First, that's not what Trump did. Form your own opinion on crime part, but he did not resign. Second, presidential resignation is pretty big deal, isn't it? Presidents extremely reluctant to do it. Only happened once. 2/4
Third, what about criminal liability? Dems appear to have no interest, but Trump is still liable to prosecution. Could have serious consequences, whereas guilty impeachment verdict at most would bar Trump from holding future office he likely won't run for, anyway. 3/4
Democrats have created lots of problems for themselves by rushing to impeach a president who will be a former president before trial begins. Senate Dems want to confirm Biden appointments, get started on agenda. But the trial... 1/6 washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…
WP reports Dems want quick trial, get it over with, get on to business. Maybe split days, impeachment and other biz. But that would just prolong the proceedings. Maybe Pelosi can play tricks with timing, delay sending to Senate. She's done it before! 2/6 washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…
Now Democrats want Senate Republicans to help get them out of impeachment jam. Really? Why should Republicans do that? 3/6
Looks very much like Trump impeachment will happen. House GOP expects Democrats to move ahead next week, possibly Wednesday. 'It appears the train has left the station,' said one GOP source. 1/6
In 2019 House GOP leaders took pride in fact that zero Republicans supported impeachment. Unlikely that will happen again, even though, issues aside, many think it is crazy to impeach a president with days left in office. 2/6
House GOP leadership has not yet had conference call with members, so it's unclear what most think. Unclear how many would support Democratic articles. Probably a low number. 3/6
One little corner of things: Think I'm down about 13,000 followers in the last 48 hours or so.
Now, down 22,000.
Now, down nearly 29,000. I think about 1500 of that came slowly between election and early January, when I was writing that results showed Biden victory and Trump legal options narrowing, then finished. Angered some followers. But big, precipitous drop has come in recent hours.
An appalling moment at Speaker Pelosi's news conference. After months of stonewalling Trump efforts to pass targeted short-term relief for millions of Americans suffering in the pandemic, she changed her mind. 1/10 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-…
A relief measure Pelosi had been blocking for months is now OK. Why? 'A total game-changer--a new president and a vaccine,' she explained. 2/10 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-…
As policy, it made no sense. Why condition help for struggling Americans on the development of a vaccine? Didn't the lack of vaccine in recent months, with virus raging, make it *more* urgent to help people? Yet Pelosi wouldn't do it. 3/10