I can confirm that the decision of Lady Carmichael is imminent in #peoplesas30 and will be published at 12 noon on the 5th of February 2021 (tomorrow) on the court's website here: scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgmen…
Whatever the judgement is (because we've not seen it), it's important to know that it's likely going to end up in the inner house appeals court next. Because if we win, the UK Government just love to waste taxpayers money trying to usurp their rights.
If they win, well then, we just can't allow that to stand.

Sincerely,

Martin Keatings

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Martin J Keatings #VoteAFI2

Martin J Keatings #VoteAFI2 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MartinJKeatings

6 Feb
@trader_buddha @pjnichols @No431onthelist @BBCPhilipSim @AUOBALBA Part 1, Article 1, Paragraph 1, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights "All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development."
@trader_buddha @pjnichols @No431onthelist @BBCPhilipSim @AUOBALBA I know the provision off by heart. LOL But one you might not be aware of is paragraph 3.
@trader_buddha @pjnichols @No431onthelist @BBCPhilipSim @AUOBALBA The States Parties to the present Covenant, including those having responsibility for the administration of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity with....
Read 5 tweets
6 Feb
I want to say something about @action4indy (AFI) which is now registered with the Electoral Commission (a saga caused by it's unique design -but nothing worth doing is easy).
I am an outsider. I've never really prescribed to one party or another. I'm staunchly pro-independence and I staunchly protect my independent status. I'm all for advocating for independence and I am all for advocating for my local community.
I've always hated what I refer to as the "party whip" and have always felt that having to vote stringently along party lines takes something away from politicians. If you vote the party line all the time, it's not always a good thing for your own constituency.
Read 23 tweets
6 Feb
I just want to clarify something about the #peoplesas30 because of a misconception. I've seen quite a few posts saying that the case, if lost, would be detrimental to the cause. It can't be and here's the reason why.

THE UK GOVERNMENT ADVANCED NO ARGUMENT AGAINST OUR OPINION.
What I mean by "opinion" is the original legal opinion written by Aidan O'neill QC that says that the Scottish Parliament already has the power to legislate for a referendum. The UK Government has advanced no argument against it.
The only arguments that the UK Government have advanced is against the right of the electorate to ask a perfectly legitimate question like this.
Read 23 tweets
5 Feb
Evening All,

Obviously, this mornings update was done quickly on the back of the ruling having just arrived.
Counsel has spent the day going much deeper into the ruling and while I am not able to go through everything at this stage, what I can say is that our grounds for the inner house of court of session are stronger than we first thought. Which is great.
Joanna Cherry also piped up this afternoon, being a QC she had a good read of the judgement. Her assessment was put out on Twitter:
Read 10 tweets
5 Feb
To all the SNP parliamentarians whooping today and about the ruling of lady carmichael and hashtagging with both votes SNP. Firstly, this result was expected. Very few of these types of cases succeed in the outer house. Going to the inner house was expected.
Secondly! Hang your head in shame for trying to campaign for your party on the back of this case. The "Premature, Academic and Hypothetical" would not have been a thing had your party released the 11 point plan the day before they actually did.
Why? Because it falls apart at point 5 and actually goes into EXACTLY the thing we've been asking in the case. You're not telling me that legal advice was not sought on something that substantive and that the party and its counsel did not know about it BEFORE the hearings.
Read 4 tweets
4 Feb
Disabled. I am disabled. All these PC terms like "less abled" and person with a disability etc. These are all meaningless to me. Why? Because I am not defined by my disability, I'm defined by how I overcome it. All these terms used to describe me are created by...
...the able-bodied because they feel awkward about interacting with someone who is disabled. They are created so other people can feel more comfortable about the fact they feel uncomfortable around disabled people, not so I can feel more comfortable around them.
All you do when you keep changing the terminology is to paint over the underlying issue. Namely that people who do not share the characteristics I have (disability) keep trying to come up with stupid ways to label me and others like me rather than using "person".
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!