Thread by @Carlier_J87

If a Canary Wharf site will yield £300mio profit upon completion, can't be developed without strips of land owned by a separate company, how much are these strips of land worth? @TransparencyTF @MoonBeever @APPGbanking @AWhistleblowing @GrantThorntonUK @cwd_legal @True_and_FairUK

Grant Thornton partner Kevin Hellard, represented by @MoonBeever acting as 'independent' Trustee in bankruptcy for the owner of this company & formerly owner of the Canary Wharf site, has sold the 50% stake in these strips of land owned by the bankrupt individual for £300,000...

Call me old fashioned, but if nobody can enjoy the £300mio or any profit that would be achieved upon completion of this development, then the strips of land are worth a minimum of £50mio. Pay £50mio and enjoy a net £250mio profit. Don't acquire the strips of land, make £0 profit.

It's that simple. Not according to Grant Thornton partner and their lawyers @MoonBeever . They believe a 50% stake in these strips of land to be worth just £300,000 and have struck a deal to sell this stake quietly and without public offering to a third party for that amount...

The third party that was privately offered this ‘deal’ on condition that he withdrew his charge held on the property of the bankrupted victim, enabling Hellard and Moonbeever to finish the destruction, begun by LBG, KPMG et al, of this victim by seizing her home….

The third party was actually a close friend of the victim & had been so shocked by the evidence of criminality that he had supported the victim. Indeed, the victim & the third party represented by @cwd_legal were jointly opposing the efforts of Hellard & Moonbeever......

Until that is, Hellard & Moonbeever offered them this sweet private deal, tempting the third party to turn on the victim in return for this huge opportunity for financial gain that this deal represented. And let's be clear, this was a 'private' deal, not put out to public tender

Hellard, Moonbeever and the third party have all seen the evidence proving that these assets are the proceeds of crime and money laundering by LBG. Apparently, if you have an agenda or if conflicts and opportunity for gain exist, such matters can be ignored….

Hellard was installed by Deloitte's (funded to tune of £13mio by LBG) & signed declaration to the High court that no 'conflict of interest' existed. Indeed, Hellard & @MoonBeever responded aggressively when I made protected disclosures to LBG alleging conflict of GT & Hellard...

Hellard and @MoonBeever reserved right to 'immediate' action if I did not satisfy two conditions within 24 hours, including a retraction of the allegations. I refused and demanded they take the 'immediate' action threatened. They failed to take any action....

After escalating this abuse of process to the @sra_solicitors and reporting the malicious communication to @kent_police , Moonbeever partner Frances Coulson claimed that my email refusing to comply, was considered by her and her client as satisfactory to warrant no action.....

Yes, you heard that right. Coulson told the SRA that my email absolutely refusing to bow to either of the two conditions they demanded of me, represented a response satisfactory to them to warrant not taking the 'immediate' action threatened......

GT Partner Hellard and Moonbeever have also contrived various means to avoid pursuing claims against LBG, KPMG and the turnaround company involved in the destruction of Angel Group, despite the overwhelming evidence to prove wrongdoing and criminality......

All the time denying conflicts of interest and dishonesty. Late last year we obtained evidence in the form of emails. These emails were sent from a Lloyds BSU employee located in Suffolk Lane London, the same BSU office where the Angel Group destruction was organised...

The emails are in respect to a customer being 'managed' in the same BSU office and involve the very same Business Turnaround Company acting as Trojan Horse, as that which was forced on the Angel Group. This LBG customer would also end up in administration......

IMPORTANTLY, this was the email signature of the Lloyds BSU employee. The Lloyds BSU employee working on that other case from the same BSU office & with same Business Turnaround Company was actually a secondee from....... Grant Thornton.

This other customer being 'managed' in this same BSU office would also end up in administration. Which firm would land the lucrative administration role for this company on which the Grant Thornton secondee had worked?.....Grant Thornton

However, not just anyone at Grant Thornton, but David Dunckley, the current CEO for Grant Thornton UK, and to who Hellard reports in his role as Partner and Insolvency Practise leader. Indeed, when Dunckley was appointed CEO, Hellard replaced him on some existing appointments....

Any pursuit of any claim against LBG, KPMG or the business turnaround company, by Hellard in his role as 'Independent' Trustee in bankruptcy, would likely implicate Grant Thornton and his colleagues and seniors in respect to their involvement in similar cases.......

Perhaps someone can tell me how this is not a conflict of interest. Because Hellard, Frances Coulson and Sam Fenwick of Moonbeever all claim no conflict exists, and Hellard has confirmed such to the Official Receiver for the purpose of a high court document to that effect.....

I presented the above thread to @MoonBeever Hellard personally, Adrian White & his media lapdog Ian Kitts this morning for comment or to challenge the accuracy of the above, ahead of a proposed publication after 5.00pm today. All declined the opportunity.

@Kashstpierre and his MP @JoStevensLabour exposed the use of conflicted secondees within LBG BSU, where the secondees firm would then land the lucrative appointment following the destruction of the customer. Our new evidence proves that this practise was widespread.....

Indeed, Chris Sheppard was a KPMG employee that worked with David Crawshaw on the 'Independent Business Review' (IBR) forced upon the Angel Group in 2011. Sheppard's Linkedin profile currently shows that he worked for KPMG in restructuring between 2008-2014....

HOWEVER, this is not what his profile used to show. Mr Sheppard amended his profile, removing from the 'record' the fact that he worked on secondment from @KPMG within the Lloyds BSU. It appears all major accountancy/insolvency firms had people on the ground within the BSU.....

My investigations shows that the firm that picked up the lucrative insolvency roles after the customer was destroyed, was invariably the same firm that 'worked with' BSU prior to the customer's demise. It's time for this to be investigated fully.