In the following thread - like I used to do in a previous life - I'll try to explain what's going on politically in #Italy (not an easy task, tbh) & what are the possible outcomes after President Mattarella asked former ECB president Mario Draghi to form a new, crucial government
1. First of all: as you know former PM Conte left because he lost his majority.
Why?
In a nutshell: former PM Matteo Renzi decided he had to go officially because "Conte lacked a long term strategy", so he and his party (whose 18 MPs were crucial) left the governing coalition"
2. According to Renzi, Conte's executive was governing "day by day" and they were not planning anything in the long term, such as how to spend the EU money from the so-called "Recovery Fund", something that must be submitted to EU authorities quite urgently.
3. Disclaimer: despite his approval looks very poor atm (his party is at 3% as per polls) Renzi is maybe the most shrewd and Machiavellian politician in Italy.
He removed former PM Letta to replace him.
He masterminded Conte's government after Salvini quitted.
He failed it.
4. All in all, if his approval ratings are at their lowest point maybe, he always manages to be influential and decisive, in one way or another.
In a way, more than a politician, he is a political broker, financially speaking.
5. In fact, maybe you saw Renzi yesterday and today giving interviews to a big bunch of international media, praising Draghi as "the best" and hinting, between the lines, that he again masterminded also his appointment by Italy's president Mattarella.
6. Ok, so now Renzi seems to be chilled-out again (for how long, nobody knows) with Mario Draghi "the best" trying to form a new government, which Renzi masterminded and wants to join of course.
But how difficult is for Draghi to form a new executive with the same Parliament?
7. To be clear: Mario Draghi is one of the utmost excellent personalities that Italy has right now. You might know that he is not a proper politician, he never formed a party, but he chaired boards like the ECB's and Bank of Italy's. And, of course, he is the man who saved euro.
8. I am not going into details on the possible coalitions from a very fragmented Italian Parliament, also because there are too many variables. Here you have a basic composition en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Ital…
What is interesting is what kind of government Draghi can make out of it. 🇮🇹
9. I am quite certain that Mattarella and Draghi want a more technocratic government, well respected in the EU, which may implement the so-called "long-term reforms" which Italy is still far from and fully use the Recovery Fund.
This scenario has a downside though.
10. The downside is this:
the more technocratic Draghi's government is, the more fragmented his coalition will be. And then more unstable.
Why?
Because he will have to rely on 2 main parties (PD + Berlusconi), Renzi, and a varied galaxy of dissidents from the other formations.
11. This, especially in light of forthcoming structural reforms, is going to be very tricky, maybe already after a few months.
But there is an alternative: a more political government.
Not Draghi's and Mattarella's cup of tea. But sure more stable.
12. But this task isn't easy either. Because, as above, the Italian Parliament (Lower House + Senate) is quite fragmented and a huge effort is needed to form a new political government.
But wait, why not repeat the same coalition of former PM Conte: PD + Renzi + 5 Star movement?
13. This is a very important point. Because the 5 Star Movement is basically split between the more ideological part (against finance, banks and euro) and the more pragmatic side (Di Maio and former ministers).
It is rumored that M5S founder Beppe Grillo is more "ideological".
14. The big question for M5S is.
How dangerous is for them to be in a Dragh government?
Pretty much. Because of its populist large base. Also, if Salvini stays in opposition, he might steal votes.
Remember: M5S greatest success came after opposing Monti, very similar to Draghi
15. Huge dilemma. But let's suppose that M5S stays out of Draghi's govt.
The other decisive character of this story is Matteo Salvini, the leader of right-wing party League.
But wait, how is possible that Salvini, who has been anti-euro for a long time, might now JOIN DRAGHI?
16. First of all: in Italy's politics impossible is nothing.
Secondly, Salvini belongs to the same coalition front with Berlusconi, who wants to join Draghi, unlike the other opposition partner, the right-wingh Brothers of Italy.
But there is third more important point, IMHO.
17. If M5S stays out of Draghi's government and Draghi OKs him, Salvini has a huge opportunity to be back into the spotlight and become very influential again.
He could be the anti-EU deterrent to Draghi pro-EU government.
He could pull the plug off whenever he wants to.
18. Is it really a possible scenario?
If Draghi cannot find a majority and Salvini asks to join... it's not impossible.
Draghi could then try to "control" Salvini in a government.
Salvini could regain an international spot and appear more institutional - if it's real or not.
19. This is just speculation, but I think that Salvini could also turn into a Trojan Horse in Draghi's government, in this scenario.
There might be a common strategy by Salvini and Brothers of Italy: one in government, the other at opposition, with the same aim:
Burn Draghi out
20. But it's also possible that Draghi will not be able to form a new government.
In that case, there will be 2 major consequences:
1) A new election is gonna be inevitable.
2) The chances of Draghi as a potential future President of Italy might get seriously tarnished.
🇮🇹
21. Wait, we said that Draghi was appointed to form a government as new PM.
Why I said that he might become the new President as well.
Well, rumours and speculations say that, if everything goes smoothly, after a spell as PM, he is poised to become the new President of Italy.
22. Because, yes, this is another chapter of this dramatic political puzzle.
Mattarella's presidential term ends early next year.
So, the Parliament, in this utterly turmoil, is going to elect also the new President.
And this is another massive, overlapping issue.
23. Another complication is that the last 6 months of a Presidential term are the so-called "White semester", during which the President cannot dissolve the Italian Parliament and call a new election. 😱
So, if needed, Italy should go for a new election before Aug 2021.
24. So, Mario Draghi and Italy have enormous challenges ahead.
If Draghi manages to form a government in the next few days, ruling is going to be a very tough task.
If he is not able to do it, his political career risks to be burned out. And a new election will be inevitable.
25. And also, what is PM Conte then going to do? Be a proper politician and not only a PM? Another huge variable.
Please note that most polls see League and Fratelli d'Italia (two radical right-wing parties) ahead and the most likely to form a new government after an election.
26. That's why Draghi's challenge ahead is extremely delicate.
After the last technocratic government (Monti's), Italy voters gave way to the maybe most populist executive after WW2: Salvini's League + Grillo's and Di Maio's Five Star Movement.
Something similar can now happen.
27. I hope I was clear & concise enough to explain a very complicated matter like Italian politics, especially right now.
Oh well, maybe not only right now.
Draghi's government would be #Italy's 73rd government in 78 years (since 1943)
Thanks for your attention and cheerio! 🇮🇹
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yesterday, I interviewed for @repubblica the celebrated American novelist John Grisham. For the first time, Grisham revealed that Donald Trump has split his family and that he and his Trump-supporting siblings barely talked anymore. A thread 🧵
1 / Grisham: "I have friends who voted for Trump. I have siblings who voted for Trump, and this is what Trump has done to our country. A lot of families have split up. Including my family, a lot of friends have stopped speaking frankly - I have some Republican friends - because we never talk about politics in this country. You only bring up politics with somebody if you live with somebody on your side. You know you never because things are so toxic, almost to the point of violence, either you love Trump, or you hate Trump, and there's no in-between".
2 / Grisham: "My sister in England, we're very close. We have the same politics. The rest of the family, if they call, I would talk to them. If I call them, they would talk. But we haven't talked much recently. I think it's all because of politics. [...] Yeah, we used to talk about politics. We stopped years ago because things got kind of rough, and then along came Trump, and you can't even bring it up now because it's very toxic".
🧵Breve storia triste. Giusto per farvi capire in che mani stiamo su X. E quanto pericolosa sia diventata questa piattaforma. 1) Ashlea Simon, co-leader del partito di estrema destra britannico "Britain First", stamani twitta una fake news. Un fotomontaggio di un falso articolo del Telegraph, mai esistito, che parla di deportazioni alle Falklands degli arrestati dei riots di questi giorni...
2) @elonmusk, l'uomo più ricco del mondo e padre padrone del social più influente al mondo, riprende la fake news e la dà in pasto ai suoi quasi 200 milioni di follower, con il messaggio "Detainment Camps"....
@elonmusk 3) In soltanto 15 minuti, Musk fa totalizzare a questa bufala vergognosa almeno un milione di views, grazie alla sua condivisione (e approvazione).
1. Do you really think that Donald Trump, as he says, can stop the war in Ukraine in 24 hours?
NF: “This is how Trump operates: he makes big claims. What he's saying is that he will get Putin and Zelensky together for a peace negotiation. Now, it might fail. It might fail, but he will at least attempt to do that. Whereas, at the moment, the West seems to think that Ukraine is going to win. Well, however many weapons we give Ukraine, Russia isn't going to give in and there is a danger this war goes on for over five years. A genuine danger. It’s a little bit like the Italian battles on the Isonzo. Endless, endless, endless war… So look, Trump may fail with that. But I do see him as a peacemaker, the first American president in several that didn't launch any new wars. I think this is why he's important. And for Europe, you know, Trump is making NATO stronger by telling NATO members they got to pay their 2% and quite right, too.”
2. So do you think that Trump, with his remarks on NATO, is literally provoking the opposite effect, making NATO stronger?
NF: “Yeah, I think Stoltenberg loves Trump, because he makes people spend more. Trump said to me: “I’m 100% behind NATO provided everybody plays fair””
Ahead of Keir Starmer's major speech today, I interviewed veteran Labour MP Jon Cruddas @JonCruddas_1 in @repubblica about his new book “A Century of Labour” (Polity Books).
Cruddas explains to me why he "fears that Labour will have no mandate for change once in government", but also his concerns about "the lack of independent thought in the party".
Moreover, despite his great achievements so far, "Starmer remains quite an elusive political character" and Cruddas tells why the Labour Party "could be destroyed by victory" after the 2024 election. 🧵 FULL INTERVIEW HERE 👉repubblica.it/esteri/2024/01…
1. Cruddas praises the words of his leader Keir Starmer, because “it's quite a good, ethical case to make in terms of public standards in public life. There’s only been three Labour Prime Ministers who won power at general election in 100 years and the possibility of Starmer becoming the fourth Labour Prime Minister is a phenomenal development. Objectively that's something that should be recognised”.
However, Cruddas stresses, “The journey is not complete, and I don't think anyone should assume that the election is done and dusted”.
2. So far, Starmer has played a very cautious but productive political strategy, also thanks to the self-destructive instincts of the Tory Party. Is this position tenable? “I think it's insufficient”, Cruddas notes, “the danger is to win an election, which becomes a referendum on the incumbent government, but without a mandate for change. That seems to me to be a real concern, because the Labour will inherit a total mess”.
Qualche giorno fa sono andato a Portland, nel sud dell'Inghilterra, dove c'è la controversa chiatta dei migranti e richiedenti asilo, ieri evacuata perché è stato rinvenuto il batterio della legionella. Ecco quanto ho visto e sentito al porto e in città. Cose non incoraggianti.
1. La chiatta si trova qui, sull'isola di Portland, anche se in realtà una connessione con la Gran Bretagna c'è grazie all'unica strada verso Weymouth e Chesil Beach, infinito e malinconico istmo di spiaggia dello straordinario romanzo di Ian McEwan (terza foto, sullo sfondo).
2. La chiatta Bibby Stockholm, che dovrebbe ospitare 500 migranti e richiedenti asilo "illegali" per il governo, è stata attraccata nel porto privato e blindato Portland Port Ltd. La polizia ammette solo gli addetti ai lavori. Questo è il massimo che sono riuscito a vedere da lì.
BREAKING. Irish Foreign minister @simoncoveney tells me: "There is a real intent in London to try to resolve the #Brexit protocol issues through negotiation over the next few weeks and months. And I think the EU will respond to that generously. In fact, I know they will." 🇬🇧🇪🇺🇮🇪
Coveney: "I think there is an agreement between the British and Irish Governments and certainly, I think there's a view within the British government now that an election at this time in Northern Ireland really serves no positive purpose. It would be a very polarising..."
"...election through the winter at a time when households are focusing on the cost of living at a time when businesses are under pressure. And so to push a potential election back into next year, to give some space for us to try to resolve some of the other issues." #coveney