I just read the ProPublica article (I got back yesterday after 10 days of being disconnected). Overall, I think it's good but one-sided. I'm not remotely depressed, there's a lot of joy in our household, and we don't really look this emo! propublica.org/article/the-cl…
I think climate emotions run the gamut. In my case, as opposed to being depressed, I'm afraid, frustrated, and furious - with brief intense spikes of grief thrown in every month or so for good measure.
Also, yeah, low-energy living comes with tough lessons, but it's also fun. I LOVE gardening and growing fruit trees! And you do need lots of compost to do that well... I was actually a decent chicken-keeper, back when I did it. And dumpster diving is better than you think
The main reason I dove into low-energy living was to push against the systems that force us to burn lots of fossil fuel, and explore those edges, and what it feels like to push past some of them. Also simply because I hate burning fossil fuel... it harms others!
But overall, the piece captures the terror, helplessness, and salience of that awful heatwave and climate fire quite well. And also the burden of holding this knowledge in the midst of a society that is largely ignoring it. Which I know a lot of you feel, as well.
Also... fwiw... Liz amped up the searing emotions of a very stressful moment and left out any hint of love and joy, the depth of trust and love in my relationship with Sharon and my boys, and all the really careful, hard work I've done to create change over the last 10 years.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It turns out that 68% of humans, if given the choice, would choose to only extract from nature what can be regenerated, leaving plenty for future generations. So we're not all greedy bastards.
The problem, of course, is that 32% of us would choose to extract everything immediately and convert it to profit for themselves. They end up extremely rich and can easily capture the media, the financial system, and our politics.
Sound familiar?
This guarantees ecological crisis and overshoot after a few generations.
Our current system prioritizes corporate profits and the accumulation of vast wealth and power in the hands of a few, whereas I imagine a system that prioritizes people and the planet and which is far more equitable. My imperfect label for the former system is "capitalism."
I think the next big thing in the climate movement will be mainstreaming the idea that we can't come out of climate and ecological breakdown without shifting the goal away from profit & accumulation and toward people & planet. That is, to end "capitalism"
The Green New Deal is an important stepping stone but I think we need to go further - we need to actually change the goal of the entire system. The goal can no longer be profit & massive accumulation & desperate consumption, it needs to be happy humans on a healthy planet.
Here are a few of the most impactful climate books I've read. First up: "Less is More" by @jasonhickel. Yes, we CAN organize society around human thriving instead of further enriching billionaires. Yes, we DO need to deal w growthism to stop climate and ecological breakdown.
Next, "Braiding Sweetgrass" by Robin Wall Kimmerer. Such a tour de force melding of science, indigenous wisdom, and poetry. I dare you to read it without crying. Especially the elders as last living remnants of their mother tongues, and how language is so much more than language.
"Merchants of Doubt" by @NaomiOreskes and @ErikMConway (who happens to be a colleague of mine at the space lab). The classic exposé of the evil scholars who create confusion and delay in support of deadly corporate malfeasance with their lies. Yes, evil.
Why is hunger skyrocketing, when almost half of food produced is thrown into landfills and the stock market is soaring?
Why is it so hard to get healthcare for all, even during a pandemic, even when the policy is so popular? Why is healthcare still tied to employment? Certainly, industry profits and money in politics. But it's even deeper.
Those who control the capital seek to create scarcity - or rather, the illusion of scarcity, by artificially preventing access - so as to force the workers into what amounts to wage slavery and drive exponential growth, which is also destroying the Earth's living systems.
We need a billion climate activists. No one can tell you how to be a climate activist; that's up to you to figure out. But here are a few suggestions.
First, find a local group of activists to join - or better yet, two or three. You need to find your people: people who share a similar set of goals as you, people you like and who are working toward something you believe in.
These activists will become your friends and co-conspirators. Logistically and emotionally, climate activism is too hard to do alone. You need support, and your voice will be more powerful when joined with your group.
Two basic concepts in climate I want the public to know:
1 Trend. If something gets worse every day, after some time it becomes unbearable and systems break.
2 Irreversibility. Humans can't "clean up" climate breakdown or ecosystem and biodiversity loss.
That we're on an escalator should be very obvious, but I still see articles on "navigating change" and the phrase "new normal" pop up enough that I'm not sure it is. Even prominent scientists until recently used the phrase "new normal," probably because it makes a good soundbite.
Until we stop the drivers of the escalator, it will keep taking us up into hotter and hotter temperatures, which are driving all the awful impacts we're seeing. The main driver is simple: extracting and burning fossil fuel. Animal agriculture is a major contributor (~15%) as well