I mean, aside from anything else: tying someone up and then *leaving them alone* as part of the scene, as way to induce fear? That’s so stale, so FAKE. If a domme doesn’t have the talent to really SCARE someone she’s there in the room with? She’s probably in the wrong business.
I’m not judging nobody I’m just saying, from my own point of view
Once I had a submissive who had A Thing That He Hated to have to do, and that was: he hated to pull the cotton wads out of bottles of medicines. He just couldn’t STAND the way it felt on his fingers, he could hardly bear it. He knew this about himself and he talked to me about it
It came up because his top before me, knowing he hated to do this, would make him do it as punishment and he really didn’t like that or want to continue.
And I was horrified that someone would exploit someone’s existing feelings this way. It’s just cheap and shallow to do that
So I told him then and I still say now that I do not use peoples... individual sensitivities, let’s call them? as tools for my BDSM play. It’s not creative or clever or edgy it’s just wrong.
Now - there are times when people particularly want to play with a certain kind of phobia, but that’s something that you usually do more overtly

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mistress Matisse

Mistress Matisse Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mistressmatisse

20 Sep 20
Or - here is a radical idea - you could stop fucking trying to codify patriarchal control over women’s bodies into the legal system 🤡
“A whole separate supreme court just to decide on when women are allowed to have a medical procedure on their own body” GREAT IDEA wow so progressive and forward-thinking 🙄🙄🙄
That’s like something out of fucking Gilead. I don’t know why these other people - FUNNY HOW THEY ALL SEEM TO BE THE SAME GENDER - don’t seem to see that.
Read 4 tweets
7 Jan 20
@heroinebook So, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you wrote this? washingtonpost.com/health/nonprof…
And we need to talk about it. Because it is just made of NOPE. #sexwork
@heroinebook First of all, I'm surprised to see someone happily extolling the practice of taking people's DNA nonconsensually, and then giving it to police (! ! !) so they can covertly track potentially vulnerable women without their knowledge. Medically! That is not ever a good thing. No.
@heroinebook And, if you had just checked the archives of WaPo, you would have learned a lot about these vague, scary, but essentially fact-free talking points of anti-sexworkers. A few links on the subject: washingtonpost.com/news/fact-chec…

Or washingtonpost.com/news/fact-chec…

Or washingtonpost.com/news/fact-chec…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!