I mean, aside from anything else: tying someone up and then *leaving them alone* as part of the scene, as way to induce fear? That’s so stale, so FAKE. If a domme doesn’t have the talent to really SCARE someone she’s there in the room with? She’s probably in the wrong business.
I’m not judging nobody I’m just saying, from my own point of view
Once I had a submissive who had A Thing That He Hated to have to do, and that was: he hated to pull the cotton wads out of bottles of medicines. He just couldn’t STAND the way it felt on his fingers, he could hardly bear it. He knew this about himself and he talked to me about it
It came up because his top before me, knowing he hated to do this, would make him do it as punishment and he really didn’t like that or want to continue.
And I was horrified that someone would exploit someone’s existing feelings this way. It’s just cheap and shallow to do that
So I told him then and I still say now that I do not use peoples... individual sensitivities, let’s call them? as tools for my BDSM play. It’s not creative or clever or edgy it’s just wrong.
Now - there are times when people particularly want to play with a certain kind of phobia, but that’s something that you usually do more overtly
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“A whole separate supreme court just to decide on when women are allowed to have a medical procedure on their own body” GREAT IDEA wow so progressive and forward-thinking 🙄🙄🙄
That’s like something out of fucking Gilead. I don’t know why these other people - FUNNY HOW THEY ALL SEEM TO BE THE SAME GENDER - don’t seem to see that.
@heroinebook First of all, I'm surprised to see someone happily extolling the practice of taking people's DNA nonconsensually, and then giving it to police (! ! !) so they can covertly track potentially vulnerable women without their knowledge. Medically! That is not ever a good thing. No.
@heroinebook And, if you had just checked the archives of WaPo, you would have learned a lot about these vague, scary, but essentially fact-free talking points of anti-sexworkers. A few links on the subject: washingtonpost.com/news/fact-chec…