And it's what the DPP privately communicated to the US during a talk about auto chip shortages yesterday - which, curiously, did not focus on auto chips and did not speak to the issue of prioritizing their production
Instead, the DPP privately said they would continue squeezing world chip supplies to get diplomatic support for an independence resolution this year.
Additionally, both the TSMC plant in Arizona and ongoing 'shortages' for Chinese manufacturing are being dangled as carrots: support TW independence, and the DPP gives the US chipmaking expertise and will continue to weaken China's manufacturing sector
Taiwan's referundum act stipulates the next available referendum date is August of this year - so expect the DPP to begin building public support for this starting in June, if they choose to exercise this option
The DPP believes it is "now or never" for the referendum - public support for independence has peaked, and in a few years, the Chinese military will have force overmatch vs even the US+Japan in a Taiwan scenario
Additionally, there are parts of the US military and national security apparatus that want to force a confrontation with China sooner than later - before China gets any stronger, in other words
This is partly why TSMC's production lines have been booked full - certain customers are now aware that supplies may be interrupted later this year, so are stockpiling just in case
To the best of my knowledge, none of this has been disclosed publicly yet. If the ball starts rolling, expect a PR campaign to kick off sometime in June of this year, possibly on the 2nd anniversary of the start of the HK riots.
To repeat: this what a Chinese military officer meant when he told me that "leaving TSMC in the hands of Taiwan separatists is like leaving a loaded gun in the hands of a toddler."
One way or another, the adults will be put back in charge - and very, very soon.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This counterintuitive result is mainly because Taiwan island has nearly 8x as many soldiers per capita as mainland China (290k soldiers / 23m people vs 2m soldiers across 1.3b people).
2/ Once, at a reception, caught a bunch of HK girls gossiping about a mainland girl's lack of taste. "She's wearing so much Gucci. Doesn't she know that people who have been properly raised, wear Marni for casual and Valentino or Chloe for things like this?"
3/ Had a HK banker unironically tell me that "people like us are just working class, man" as he blew tens of thousands of HKD at a club.
In case it isn't blatantly obvious already, don't stick around in the US if you are Chinese and work in a STEM field - especially if you have expertise in AI, materials science, genomics, quantum physics, or any of the other 'sensitive' fields the US wants to control
No matter what, you'll be contributing to the economy of a regime that wants to keep China down, and you will likely be monitored by dedicated programs within US government agencies for the entirety of your career
Instead, you should either head back to China as soon as feasible - or stick around just long enough to get some valuable IP in your head and then leave.
Stick it to the US. Do everything you can to help China gain technological primacy.
...as predicted. Would be hilarious if the US sanctions Myanmar, India pulls out, and Myanmar hands over Sittwe to China to operate, thereby giving China a land-connected port on the other side of the Straits of Malacca. If I was China I would be hoping the US pulls the trigger
also note that Sittwe is the capital of the Rohingyas' home state, Rakhine, which means it would be ground zero for any sanctions the US imposes due to a genocide finding... and the India port/rail project is the single largest project by total FDI in that city
...and the main armed group in the region is reputed to be backed by Pakistan.
So you could theoretically see China orchestrating a deal if the Indians pull out where Rohingyas get more autonomy, Pakistan cuts ARSA support, and Myanmar redirects road/rail to Yunnan
a) Whether this is a net gain or loss for the US or China is murky
b) One thing is clear: neither the US nor China has much to gain from intervening in favor of one side or another
2/ Early reports suggest Chinese FM Wang Yi was briefed on the dispute between the Tatmadaw and ASSK's USDP somewhere between Jan 12 and Jan 14. However, this doesn't mean China supports these actions, because China has been getting along fine with the USDP for 4+ years now
3/ Indeed, since both the Tatmadaw, USDP, and numerous ethnic armies in Burma were all neutral-friendly with China, the PRC likely opposes any upheaval in Myanmar's political landscape - but is likewise not likely to lose much unless the situation further destabilizes