Ok so I already did a thread on today’s CDC nonsense, but it's even worse than I thought
The CA counties used in the study, supposedly proof of statewide mask mandates working, are Alameda, Contra Costa & SF
Their mandates were all in effect by 4/22. State wasn’t until 6/18
The CA counties used in the study, supposedly proof of statewide mask mandates working, are Alameda, Contra Costa & SF
Their mandates were all in effect by 4/22. State wasn’t until 6/18
So when did they start counting data from these counties? Who knows! Every site has different starting periods.
But it makes absolutely no sense to use only three sites from a state that all had mandates months earlier, and pretend like the STATEWIDE mandate made any difference
But it makes absolutely no sense to use only three sites from a state that all had mandates months earlier, and pretend like the STATEWIDE mandate made any difference
Obviously, they also, of course, got to ignore the fall surge, which, you know, seems relevant.
Also, the hospitalization growth rate was going down more significantly over 4 weeks BEFORE mask mandates than it did up to 3 weeks afterwards.
What is this…I mean, really, what in the world is this?
What is this…I mean, really, what in the world is this?
The CDC is also contradicting itself when considering the Arizona & Kansas studies. AZ never had a statewide mask mandate, but that didn’t stop the CDC from crediting masks. KS only had certain counties too.
But here, county mandates are ignored in favor of statewide mandates
But here, county mandates are ignored in favor of statewide mandates
It’s misleading trash, and it’s embarrassing that it was published. It’s going to be broadcast all over the media because it fits their agenda, and it’s just total nonsense.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
