New group within the Labour Party, fighting transphobia:

labourtransequality.org.uk/the-definition…

Defining Transphobia in the Labour Party A Consultation: Responses should be sent in confidence to admin@labourtransequality.org.uk by 1st March 2021

Would be good to send them your views - I will
'Some people may have transitioned from expressing themselves in their birth sex into living in their preferred gender identity while others have not. This is a personal decision which is acknowledged in the Equality 2010 and Gender Recognition Acts 2004.' Wrong! The GRA...
prescribes that you must live in your preferred gender for two years, before applying for a Gender Recognition Certificate.

@LabourLte
Highly dubious statement (where is the scientific evidence?). And why are so many girls 'discovering' that they are trans in puberty?

@LabourLte
Here comes the fun bit:
'Defining Expression of Transphobia In the Labour Party'

'1. Denying the existence of trans people' --- Nobody is denying that trans people exist - this is a misrespresentation - and childish.

@LabourLte
'and campaigning against trans people’s human and civil rights like public services is transphobic.' This is just confused. Excluding transpeople from certain services can be lawful (Explanatory Notes to EA, p. 157). Protecting theses exemptions doesn't affect human/civil rights.
'6. Claiming there is a “conflict” between trans people’s rights and women’s or other communities’ rights is transphobic.' The exemptions in the Equality Act are presupposing a rights' clash. This Act balances the competing rights of women and transwomen. Is the EA 'transphobic'?
'8. Failure to include trans people at all levels and structures of decision making within the Labour Party and is movement is institutionally transphobic and exclusionary.'

This goes for everyone (women, BAME) not just for trans people.

@LabourLte
'10. There are good and bad people in all communities.' This is a deflection of the real problem. E.g., sexual violence by transwomen prisoners in a women's prison is not primarily about good or bad people, it's an institutional failure. Female prisoners should be protected...
...from transwomen prisoners, particularly if these have a history of violence against women.

'11. Trans people should be able to stand for public office without discrimination and without fear of hatred.' Sure, but not on women-only short lists, where they displace women.
'No. 13 Misrepresenting what trans people say or do, because you don’t understand it is transphobic.' This assumes that if you disagree, then you don't understand. It is also one-sided (assumes infallibility?). One principle of justice is: Listen to the other side. Ditto No. 14

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Miroslav Imbrisevic

Miroslav Imbrisevic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Miroandrej

23 Jan
'trans athletes would not compete if they did not think it was fair to do so.' Teetzel misses the point: thinking it is fair doesn't make it fair.

tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Teetzel, p. 435/6: 'Despite the ample media attention that
Radcliffe, Navratilova, Davies, Holmes and others have received, they continue to push the narrative that their voices are being silenced and ignored.' Well, the reactions they got for speaking out, shows that they...
...are right. Pressure on sponsors, etc. is an attempt to shut them up. That's why athletes who are still competing will not talk about the issue of transwomen athletes.
Read 16 tweets
23 Jan
This morning I remembered the famous quote from Wittgenstein (§ 38): 'For philosophical problems arise when language goes on holiday.' And then looked at the German: 'Denn die philosophischen Probleme entstehen, wenn die Sprache feiert.' A metaphor reconceptualises reality, ...
...it creates distance - and insight - by linking two disparate realms. But Anscombe creates more distance by changing the metaphor. She may be right to chose 'language goes on holiday', but we could be closer to the German original 'feiert': 'language is having a party' or
'language is celebrating'. Going on holiday gives it a different flavour.
Read 4 tweets
5 Jan
THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK:
Discourses like that of Kathleen Stock 'reinforce the patriarchal status quo'. Au contraire - transwomen who imitate the worst stereotypes of the social role 'woman' reinforce the patriarchy - they have imbibed too much of it.

sites.google.com/view/trans-phi…
"Conflating concern about the harms of Stock’s work with threats to academic freedom obfuscates important issues." No. Like many others, Ichikawa conflates disagreement about gender ideology with transphobia and with harm to trans people.
Disagreement doesn't cause harm. But employing a transwomen in a rape crisis centre will continue to traumatise victims of sexual violence. And why would anyone - employer or employee - with real concern for women think that this is a good idea? All in the name of inclusion.
Read 9 tweets
3 Jan
Rachel McKinnon/Veronica Ivy's latest: "In deciding whether trans and intersex women should be allowed to compete as women, who has the burden of proof in the debate? The answer is clear: those who seek to exclude." No. If you want to change the status quo, the burden of proof... Image
...is on you. Secondly, here is the usual attempt to muddy the waters by including intersex people (whose sex characteristics are atypical) in the debate. We know the sex of transwomen and transmen. They are unhappy with the sex they were born with.

docs.google.com/document/d/12Q…
"The International Olympic Committee (IOC), the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), and the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) all clearly state that there is a human right to participate in competitive sport." No. What the IOC and CAS say about human rights and sport has...
Read 102 tweets
22 Aug 20
Feminism does not have to be trans-inclusive, and transwomen don’t have to be included in the class ‘women’ – provided that you look what’s under the label ‘transwoman’.

miroslavimbrisevic.wordpress.com/2020/08/22/tra…
Betcher writes that if you don't know trans communities then you are 'incapable of interpreting self-identifies'. But why should their self-ID within the trans community carry forward to the wider community? Why demand this when the standards in the wider community differ?
Bettcher draws the wrong conclusions. She might be right that within trans communities a transwoman may claim that she is a 'woman', but this does not hold within the wider community. There, she can only claim that she is a transwoman.
Read 5 tweets
5 Mar 20
THREAD: 1/THE LANGUAGE OF LAW
Trans activists in the UK might get confused by the phrasing in the 2004 Gender Recognition Act, section 9 (1), particularly by the phrase ‘for all purposes’. This has a specific legal meaning and history...
2/It is short for ‘to/for all intents and purposes’, going back to English law in the 16th century. It means: ‘in every practical sense’ or ‘virtually’. It does not mean that a transwoman is a woman; it only means that the law will treat a transwoman...
3/...as if she were a (biological) woman, by issuing a new birth certificate. What we have here is a legal fiction, a helpful construct going back to ancient times. Roman law treated soldiers who were captured by the enemy (i.e. enslaved) as if they were free men.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!