"Should poorly informed citizens be allowed to vote?" and "Should anyone over 60 be allowed to run for office?" are all ugly flowers residing in one digusting bouquet of discrimination.
People can only be deemed "poorly informed" when those making the judgment are certain 100% that all modes at communication (language based, socio-cultural & ethnoreligious-based) have been achieved & are sustained.
Even so, WHY should a human's civic right EVER be tied to such?
How dare you deploy your privilege & parakpo to even fathom, much less openly discuss the possibility of discrimination of Nigerians along these metrics?
Whose idea was it?
You fight for your rights by day, but discuss excluding others by night; uhm, is everything okay at home?
Y'all KNOW we already struggle with poor voter education & civic awareness because that field is where many of you EAT.
Your parents, relatives like the most other Nigerians are hampered by language, social, cultural, ethinic & religious barriers from imbibing this information...
...yet, you decide that: 1. This means pple are "poorly" informed 2. Band in silos to examine the possibility that an answer to what you concluded is: voter exclusions.
You do realise how silly this sounds?
Are we to recite state & capital or the Constitution before we can vote?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've watched the Hausa-speaking debacle at the press conference. I shook my head at most of it.
Let me tell you a short story.
When I worked at this place in South Africa, there was always certain high profile news sources. You always had to go with two journalists. Why? Well...
They could decide to speak Afrikaans. Or Xhosa. Or Sepedi.
Did they understand English?
Perfectly. Were they discussing national issues? 100% - with even GLOBAL consequences.
Why did we adapt? They were within their rights to prioritise official, national languages, not English
This place was Reuters.
The country was South Africa.
I learns big lessons:
A newsmaker is under no obligation to suit your colonial language preferences, or even lessen their own preference.
They do have their reasons - to prevent loss of context, serve their constituency.
🇳🇬-n, Africa-focused journos,
Prices that the EU will pay for #CovidVaccines were revealed by a Belgian minister. These are traditionally deemed sensitive and commercial secrets.
Here's how to report it from an AFRICAN perspective.
Issa #RuonaTips thread. theguardian.com/world/2020/dec…
Away from the speculation of whether Eva De Bleeker wilfully revealed these vaccine prices, what concerns us is the vast range in pricing, and what this means for current negotiations being done by the AU.
Pricing is from $2.18 to $18; which is significant to Africa because...
A South African expert already said main problem Africa s having, why our govts are waiting is due to: safety, efficacy, pricing, ease of administration and storage, as well as number of doses.
So you must ask: How does this info change the negotiations?
Journalism, for all its bells and whistles, shiny business models, is fundamentally built on honour.
None of the big offices, fancy equipment will matter, if the humans are not humane.
That it was only in December you saw a call made since August, only because I amplified its contents, shows you exactly the problem, that a call has to exist, since August.
No one has to have to leave the system, and unwittingly seek a voice online, if the humans within the system had honour.
Humans make the system.
Where a system somehow leaves a person with no choice but to cry out online, only the humans indicted can make it right.
Based on recent events, fellow 🇳🇬ns, try to be sensitive when tweeting/reporting that people died via suicide.
Doesn't matter if it's true or not - you must ensure ur mode doesn't intrude on privacy or grief. Add details of @MentallyAwareNG if real intention was to give support.
Note to journos:
By media standards, the only justification for revealing suicide as a cause of death & associated details (esp when some family members haven't heard), is if in the public interest/awareness.
All media put helplines.
We now have @MentallyAwareNG so, NO EXCUSE.
If your tweet or news article doesn't contain information such as below, I'm conscience-bound to tell you that all you did was sensationalism & add to the grief of the deceased's family, without even helping the public tangibly.
There is help. Amplify it. opencounseling.com/hotlines-ng
@BBCCareers kindly furnish names and physical address of those who told @kikimordi, a freelancer that I was "asked to leave" the BBC?
We'll need to do this in an EU court of law, if LIES are peddled for damage control.
Note, I have recordings& emails.
Send to meyerruona@gmail.com
The response to seeking a non-repeat of unethical practices cannot and will never be to broadcast lies against my person.
For a day like this, I am thankful I made audio and email archives.
Thankfully, I am a German citizen who was recruited from Germany.
Therefore, @BBCCareers, expect me to use the law to its full extent.
Of that, you all can be sure.