CW
Here is a 2012 @Reuters series by @mega2e about the thriving online market of "re-homing" adopted children. Big surprise about who wants unwanted children. Pedophiles.

The platforms involved: @Yahoo and @facebook. 1/ #Thread reuters.com/investigates/a…
A FB post for a Californian tries to rehome a Russian 13 yo boy who has displayed sexually aggressive behavior. And a Floridian wants to unload an 11 yo Russian girl "who has FAS with some sexual interest." 2/
The article explains that overseas adoptions into the US had become strict, slow and expensive.And the internet paved the way for interstate transfer of children -- private, same-day, and free. Scrutinizing the new parents, is left to the parents eager to unload the kid. 3/
One unloading parent says she hates her kid so much she would have re-homed her to a serial murderer. The series describes re-homings that happen in a single day with just a 400 word Power of Attorney turning over guardianship. One 11yo is rehomed in a gas station parking lot 4/
to a woman (Nicole) whose two bio kids CPS took away permanently and then caused the bathtub drowning death of an 18 month old and a pedophile (Winslow) whose online chat names were Lovethemcute and Lil boylover. 5/
When @Yahoo learned of the bulletin boards, it removed them STAT. Facebook? Nope. Kept them up. FB defended one child peddling page, "Way Stations of Love" with this statement: "Facebook says activity on the page is 'a reflection of society.'" 6/
This statement by FB is meaningful b/c even in 2021 that argument is still used ALL THE TIME -- that we should not blame the internet for bad stuff that happens there b/c it's merely a mirror into our rotting society. However, it ignores the fact that the internet CREATES and 7/
makes convenient, free, and scales up the rot. Some crimes are BECAUSE of the internet -- the 60 m images of child sexual abuse material FB admitted to publishing in 2019, revenge porn, murders rapes and suicides live-posted, the insurrection organized and incited online, 8/
sextortion of children (and adults), misinformation disinformation, widespread conspiracy theories, radicalizing.

I'm curious if the folks who presently say the internet should not be touched b/c it's just a reflection of society, do you feel that FB should have kept up its 9/
Way Stations of Love page?

This series begs for a 2021 follow up by @reuters and/or @mega2e that finds these kids and lets them speak, that thoroughly discusses the role the platforms played and the platforms' knowledge, and that demands the platforms to make 10/
reparations to these now adults. 11/11
History is going to be very unkind to some of the decisions big tech has made. There will be a call for reparations. And I say that as somebody who spent 2000-2005 getting restitution for Holocaust survivors.
H/t to my bff @susancrumiller who alerted me to this Reuters series. 13/11

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Carrie A. Goldberg

Carrie A. Goldberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cagoldberglaw

26 Jan
Victims of child sexual abuse material can sue. 18 USC 2255

And Kellyanne, there's no "Alternative Facts" defense when it comes to child pornography. #THREAD 1/
Claudia says KA likely obtained the image when KA confiscated Claudia's phone. And she believes KA kept them for a rainy day. Claudia expressed disbelief that KA would have intentionally posted them and conjectures that maybe KA was hacked. 2/

variety.com/2021/digital/n…
However, the intentional publication isn't a necessary factor b/c it seems clear that KA would have first knowingly distributed and reproduced them for herself and then knowingly retained them. All in violation of 18 USC 2252A. 3/

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18…
Read 12 tweets
25 Jan
Zuckerberg is such a wuss he paid $130m to pretend his company isn’t responsible for major content moderation decisions.
nytimes.com/2021/01/24/bus…
The @oversightboard is a total sham. An abdication of Facebook’s responsibility to manage its own damn content. Comprised of elite judges who are as distanced from things like csam, sextortion, online harassment as imaginable.
And “structurally independent” ??
Structurally independent???
Wtf does structurally independent mean??

If you must modify the word independent , are you really independent?? 🥸
Read 5 tweets
13 Jan
As more folks are arrested for the insurrection we are going to see high rate of people with records of intimate partner violence, stalking, and harassment. 1/
Terrorizing women and girls and internet trolling is directly correlated to being violent and unreasonable in other facets. including work, friendships, school, family, AND POLITICS. 2/
As my colleague, Caroline said, "Violence against women and girls on the micro level of interpersonal IS TERRORISM designed to uphold patriarchy/male supremacy on the macro level. 3/
Read 10 tweets
13 Jan
Companies that are freezing PAC contributions to both sides are not actually taking a stance against the violent insurrection.

They’re just saving money and being cowards.
Added to the list per New York Law Journal are law firms Squire Patton Boggs and Cozen O’Connor
Proud to say @cagoldberglaw will be targeting our contribution freezes specifically to the PACs that were in any way involved in the insurrection and supporting Trump.
Read 4 tweets
10 Jan
We're one week into the new year. At this time last week, I was procrastinating Tweeting about the @60Minutes piece about Section 230 and figured I'd get to it after my all-staff-beginning-of-year on Tues.
My big takeaways are 1) I'm sad (and not surprised) that Lenny Pozner is so harassed by Sandy Hook conspiracists that he must wear those horrible prosthetics, 2) It's BS that Facebook and Instagram (worth hundreds of billions) rely on
nonprofits like Pozner's HONR to manage violent content.
Many excellent nonprofits in the tech arena (@CCRInitiative , @TheBADASS_army, @TylerClementi ) have sprung out of founders' trauma. It is intoxicating to get invited to participate in innovations on these platforms
Read 7 tweets
30 Dec 20
Section 230 did not create the internet as we know it. The shift from subscription based profit models to "free" user data-mining and advertising profit models is what created the internet.

It's when the user stopped being the customer and started being the commodity.
Section 230 was extravagantly interpreted so that users could never hold accountable a tech company for harms on the platform. The plain language supports the idea that platforms can't be sued for things like defamation
or editorial decisions. But starting early on, courts interpreted it to also prevent law suits for things like negligence by platforms. And more recently, the Second Circuit said platforms also can't be sued under product
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!