Our article includes a shoutout to the many internet sleuths (some scientists) who unearthed the connection between 2012 SARS-like cases in Yunnan and the closest virus genome to SARS-CoV-2 (covid virus). But you can read more about DRASTIC here: mygenomix.medium.com/the-origin-of-…
Article also contains the list of experts with links on each of their names so you don’t have to scroll through my 🧵 to collect all the links.
Takes different kinds of courage for non-experts to try and do something to find the #originsofcovid vs experts to come out and say that #laborigins should be investigated.
Either way...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Public service: This is now the link to the archived Fact Sheet released by the previous State Department concerning activities at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that could point to possible #laborigins of the covid-19 virus. 2017-2021.state.gov/fact-sheet-act…
@washingtonpost says "If the U.S. government possesses information to corroborate that statement, it should release it, including declassifying any intelligence." washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
The situation right now, I presume, is that the intelligence cannot be declassified because of endangering the source(s).
In that case, please create a curated list of non-gov people who can see this intelligence. There is a lot at stake.
Been seeing rumors that the Covid-19 virus (SARS-CoV-2) has never been isolated before. I'll post links and snapshots of some papers here to show that several different groups in different countries have each isolated the virus.
@meghan_daum was super nice to invite @FilippaLentzos and I on her podcast this week. It's going to be released tomorrow night or you can join Patreon to listen now.
In the podcast, we get into why it's been so challenging to talk about Covid-19 possibly originating from a lab..
I really loved the group podcast style because I learnt so much from @FilippaLentzos who is 100% eloquent in explaining what is happening in the big picture - geopolitically - and @meghan_daum who is extremely skillful at asking us the key questions the public wants answers to.
Being unable to talk about #laborigins without being attacked (even by your friends) has been a problem for both scientists and journalists since the start of this pandemic.
A lot of journalists say that scientists refused to go public with suspicions of Covid-19 lab leak...
I know that there are a growing number of similar pieces out there now including yesterday's @washingtonpost editorial board opinion, @NYMag@nicholsonbaker8 lab leak hypothesis, and @BillNye podcast interview of @DavidRelman - all superb reads/listens.
So @washingtonpost since you're just starting to report on the bat CoV sampling, chimeric viruses, the Mojiang miners, the missing database, and EcoHealth ties to the WIV - are you interested in talking to me about all these naughty papers coming out of China?
So many 🔥points about information gatekeeping and Zeynep's experience having to go against the WHO and CDC scientific consensus as an expert in an adjacent field.
💙@zeynep says, even as someone on the side of science, she doesn't like the phrases "trust/follow the science"
Science is often complicated by group-think and politics. Expert trust needs to be built, and it cannot be achieved via condescension or shaming non-experts.
Also ⚡️discussion between @zeynep and @SamHarrisOrg that sometimes, in a rare situation, it's the outsider that overturns the scientific consensus.
Most of the time the experts are correct. But how do you distinguish the rare instances when they are wrong?