Full interview here. I found Horton a really informed, accessible guest on the whole topic of Covid.
Horton’s point here a straightforward one. Had Covid 19 emerged in India or much of sub-Saharan Africa the effects would have been much worse. That it happened it China, and East Asia more generally, slowed down spread and allowed a scientifically advanced country to sequence >
The genome incredibly quickly. Next time humanity may not be so lucky.
If we can’t examine important aspects of this pandemic such as that we will not be able to prepare for future pandemics (which are inevitable, distinct coronaviruses or otherwise).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Covid-19 has 10 times the fatality rate of influenza, imagine if it was a 100 times?
An age of climate change will also be one of pandemics. That is why helping the poorest countries provide free, universal healthcare is in the interest of the wealthiest. novaramedia.com/2021/02/07/cov…
White-nose syndrome is crashing bat populations around the world, while chytridiomycosis, caused by the chytrid fungus, is doing something similar to a number of amphibian species.
The threat of climate change & future pandemics should not be viewed in isolation from one another: a world of rising temperatures, and further deforestation, also means more pandemics. These threats should be viewed as additive rather than distinct.
As a political journalist there are such immensely interesting (& terrifying!) stories out there, from the interface of technology & politics, to climate change, an epochal social upheaval & rise of China.
This is all more important, & interesting, than whining about Twitter.
Does anyone really think it adds value to their audience to constantly whine about people they don’t like? Does anyone think people will want to pay for that?
I don’t agree with them on much but you have to appreciate quality press that doesn’t do this like the Economist & FT.
For me this explains the success of Monocle magazine since 2008. It’s overpriced and the articles often aren’t anything special but you read it and see people doing interesting things all across the world. You put it down feeling refreshed and optimistic.
Labour won't back the NEU and won't offer anything which differs from the Tories.
That's been Starmer's plan since he became leader, & everything is mood music until 2024. This isn't dithering, it's the plan.
Will it work? Who knows. But for now there isn't an opposition.
The model here is the Tories in opposition during the global financial crisis. But the difference is that unlike now Labour actually dealt with that. The equivalent would have been Brown allowing complete economic meltdown and opposition shrugging soldiers.
It's particularly odd seeing Starmer supporters like @paulmasonnews outlining smart, radical and necessary policies in response to the next few months ahead.
Labour won't adopt any of them. Again, Paul, that *is* the project for Starmer until 2024. He's been very open about it.
As Britain looks set to re-open schools after 4 consecutive days of 50,000 positive tests for Covid, let's recall that Vietnam closed schools on Jan 31st 2020 - and kept them shut for more than 3 months - when the country had 5 confirmed cases.
Since then they've had 35 deaths.
Vietnam has done nothing exceptional: it quarantined all visitors and anyone who contacted a Covid case in state centres, it closed schools, and it unrolled a huge test and trade system quickly.
This year they are posting GDP growth while UK GDP sinks 10%. Let's learn from them.
And I know its hard for anglo-exceptionalists to accept but Oxford professor's data tally with the Vietnamese government. They, like others in east asia, nailed it where we brutally failed.
In suspending @jeremycorbyn the Labour leadership defied the EHRC’s *key recommendation* within minutes of saying they would implement all of the report.
David Evans & @Keir_Starmer have questions to answer.
Here Starmer says the decision was made by the general secretary, but implicitly includes himself as well.
What is more the fact multiple MPs, including Tom Watson, appear to have encouraged Corbyn to act unlawfully (according to EHRC) has not been mentioned. Why?
As with Starmer & Evans now, political interference appears to be fine for media, as long as right people are doing it.