Suspending my disbelief here for a second, is there any evidence that double-masking is meaningfully more effective than single-masking?
Have seen a lot of people ask in seeming good faith what the harm is. To me it’s pretty clear: asking or telling people to do something that is some measure of inconvenient for no good reason is bad on it’s face and fosters resentment. That’s before we get into mask scolds etc.
One of the clearest lessons through the pandemic has been that people in general and Americans in particular don’t like to be told something is helpful or important when it isn’t either. Doing so undermines trust (for good reason!) in the institutions doing the telling.
So the major downside to telling people to double mask is that they’ll think medical experts are even more full of shit than they already think. In the middle of a pandemic, this seems like a bad thing.
So, do we have any evidence that the benefits of 2x masking outweighs that?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So if I’m understanding the former-GOP types, we’re supposed to take:
• morality advice from those who lied us into Iraq
• political courage advice from those who protected a child predator &
• decorum advice from the original inflammatory shock jocks
Have I got that right?
There are a lot of examples of this but a few really jump out.
On the first one, the fascination with who Colin Powell, chief cheerleader of the lie that Iraq had WMDs, will vote for.
On what authority should anyone care?
This is the guy whose opinion you’d like me to put more stock into?
I was more sympathetic to this kind of stuff in 2016.
But this is mostly bullshit childishness from people with more interest in feeling like the good guys and earning the praise of their Democratic friends than their conviction.
Parties change over time, often in ways that people won’t like. But we’ve only got two of them. Do you want to affect change? Or do you want Politico to talk about you for being brave?
Seems to me that lots and lots of political types prefer the latter. The game hasn’t gone their way and so they would prefer to pick up the ball and go home.
In my book, that probably means you’re apathetic, lazy, or a coward.
A good and timely piece from @RyanTAnd, who is an under-appreciated intellectual titan on social issues.
In my five years in DC, I’ve never been as blown away by a speaker as I was the first time I heard him. Quick (and not particularly profound) story. wsj.com/articles/relig…
When I was on the Hill, Heritage Foundation held weekly briefings for staffers. I went mostly because my boss said I should; I thought they were often too punchy and provocative, in the way that conversations among people who all agree can be.
The transgender issue is one I’ve long thought conservatives need to approach with more compassion and charity. So when I saw that there was going to be a Heritage speaker on trans-relates issues, I figured the talk would be frustrating and dispiriting at best.
Bunch of Reddit shitposters who subsist off of Cheetos and Mountain Dew just dismantling hedgefunds for having mean ideas about a video game store is the best story to happen since the revolutionary war.
If any of these Redditers follow me I would like to humbly thank you for your service but let you know that Star Wars still isn’t good.
They should make a Disney movie out of this situation
@JoeBiden promised us better. We were told - over and over again, in no uncertain terms - that the Biden team was going to turn the coronavirus pandemic around.
Today, they told us that wasn’t true. We’ve got a lot more examples to go. 👇
Over and over again his campaign told us they were ready from the jump to fix things.
Now that @JoeBiden is in office, apparently that’s changed.
How come?
This was the message that @JoeBiden delivered throughout the campaign.
This tone sure sounds like quitting to me, Mr. President.