Remember the email re: Charli Michaels? Wade asks Joy about Norma's alleged conduct.
The only page Joy printed ended w/ "Wow. None of that is true." Wade still added it to his amended complaint—repeatedly blaming Norma ("companies").
Joy dismantles Wade's point AGAIN in depo...
In Joy's 2016 depo she is asked about the email.
JOY: "I was reprimanded by MJ, not Norma—I don't know where this came from. I did not get anything from Norma. It all came from from Michael."
Wade knew this in Feb. but still added it in Sept. amendment—a lie according to Joy.
Just as Wade perjured his declaration by claiming no knowledge of estate until 2013...
Just as Wade concealed book & 1000s of communications while claiming he only had one...
Wade added a known lie (according to Joy) about Norma to amended complaint just to further his lawsuit.
Joy's claim that it was MJ—not Norma or other staff—who reprimanded her (even if this too is largely a post-2012 fabrication) is destructive to Wade's case.
Wade's entire premise is to show it was the companies & Norma/staff who were responsible & privy to alleged abuse, not MJ.
PIC 1: Feb. 15 2016 - Wade asks Joy about Charli Michaels gossip, blaming Norma for perceived cover-up (Joy: "none of that is true.")
PIC 2: Sep. 8 2016 - Amended lawsuit w/ story.
PIC 3: Sep. 30 2016 - Joy's Depo: Norma had nothing to do with that alleged incident at all.
🤥
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: A breakdown of the "compendium of evidence" Finaldi just submitted (in person, claiming it is "too large to electronically file" 😁) in hopes of preventing the summary judgment in Wade's case.
I've previously shared most of these materials in older threads, not much new.
Finaldi has filed 51 exhibits as part of his arguments.
As I foreshadowed, he's lodged 1000s of pages of largely innocuous & irrelevant materials w/ a few "points" underlined in each of them.
But lugging in totes full of "evidence" against MJ makes compelling footage, I'm sure.
Exhibit 1 - John Branca Deposition (October 18, 2017)
John Branca is 100% supportive of MJ and offers nothing supportive for Finaldi. Finaldi establishes Branca held business meetings w/ MJ on occasion lol.
Excerpt from Joy's depo—officers always lied to create victims.
"officer talked to Wade about FACT that he'd BEEN A VICTIM & this is was pedos do. Said 'you have done nothing wrong. you can tell us.'"
This dispels Wade's lie that he believed he'd go to jail if he said anything.
Joy confirmed like so many others that tabloids wanted to pay them to say something happened.
"They told him to tell me they were offering six figures for me to change my story. National Enquirer wanted me to change my story. They were going to pay me a lot of money to do it."
In order to believe Wade's robotic 2012+ telling of events, Joy has to convince herself that Wade reached peak Oscar-winning actor status by age 7.
He was "very convincing...we all believed you" from the first time they visited Neverland until years after MJ's death (1990-2011).
THREAD: In 2013, Wade "It's time for me to get mine!" Robson debuted his tall tale accusations to universal disbelief, even among heavily guilt-centric audiences.
Of all pundits, Harvey Levin & TMZ staff were actually the most vocal in pointing out the absurdity of his claims.
When the details of Wade's claims first emerged and following his NBC tell-all, the overwhelming majority of TMZ's userbase (who have always been critical of MJ) also doubted them.
- 92% Didn't Believe Wade (168,500)
- 75% Wade Big Fat Liar (412,713)
- 75% MJ Not Pedo (612,329)
Initial sources in TMZ's circle suggested Wade's claims were based on "repressed memories" - The unfounded junk science commonly used in false CSA accusations (including those made against MJ by Kapon and Bartucci Jr.).
Wade made a point to tell Lauer it wasn't repressed memory.
THREAD: With Safechuck's case on appeal again, here's a brief analysis of Finaldi's 2018-2019 appeals using his own briefs and filings.
Many of these same arguments will repeat in his new appeal—although there are a few material differences between the 2018 ruling and 2020's.
In 2017, the judge's dismissal of James' case was based largely on the statute of limitations. During his appeal, AB 218 was passed that negated these limitations on CSA cases, so it was reversed.
In 2020, Judge Young dismissed it based on the other irreversibly flawed causes.
A good portion of Finaldi's last appeal was arguing about the timeliness of the filing, since that was the key to its dismissal. Due to AB 218, timeliness is no longer an issue.
James waited 5 years after MJ died to realize his stresses were from "abuse" after seeing Wade on TV.
Finaldi's argument re: Fox/Spence was improperly redacted, allowing one to still read what it says. 😆
And it is nothing but more blind, meaningless conjecture just to try anything he can to depose Spence/Fox.
Here's the unredacted version for Fox.
A big ole nothing-burger.
For Spence, Finaldi argues that because Spence slept in MJ's bedroom and his family got gifts from him, this somehow makes a tie to the "procurement" of CSA with other kids and shows signs of grooming (recall that Wade's allegations actually skip any such "grooming" efforts.) 🤦♂️
While Finaldi keeps fuming over the sanctions imposed against him and the judge's tentative note that his unprofessional conduct toward MJ's counsel could be construed as gender incivility...
He has no problem claiming Spence/Fox were "unwitting parties" to CSA procurement. 🙄
The attorney for Chandler/Marks has classified Finaldi's aggressive tactics as "persistent harassment and invasion of privacy" and in direct contradiction to Finaldi's own suggestion that "alleged victims and their families" shouldn't be obliged to discuss anything with him.
Lily's Attorney: "A cursory examination of Plaintiff’s submission reveals that these arguments lack merit. Instead, the instant motion for reconsideration is nothing more than Plaintiff’s FRIVOLOUS ATTEMPT at a second bite of the proverbial apple."