I don't understand the MO GOP in the G. A. This is a rural state. Big Ag has been pushing small family farmers out of business. They've had to sell their land and too many of them have committed suicide. So why are elected officials for CAFOs? Why do they agree w/ everything +
the Farm Bureau tells them to do? The Farm Bureau, ICYDK, supports Big Ag bc it's mostly funded by Big Ag. So when the GOP politicians tell you they support rural Missourians, which rural voters are they supporting? The ones that have lots of acreage and make lots of money or +
the families that raise hogs or grow vegetables to feed U. S. communities rather than the world? The GOP talks about "America First", but when it comes to agricultural what have they done to support small family farmers?
They tend to support Big Ag, because corp's such as Bayer/Monsanto, ADM, DowDuPont, and Cargill pay them to.

So in the federal gov't, how does a politician like @HawleyMO say that he supports his rural constituents, but goes after Social Media companies wrt anti-trust rather
than speaks about how the Bayer/Monsanto merger is hurting small family farmers even more than before the merger?
Also, companies like Monsanto create herbicides/pesticides and then create crops that are tolerant of those herbicide/pesticides. So, if you're a farmer who doesn't want to pay a higher price for Monsanto's soybean seed that has been bioengineered to be tolerant of Monsanto's
dicamba but the neighboring farm uses the herbicide bc they purchased the higher priced Monsanto soybean seed, then you're in a bad position. That's bc dicamba spreads to your farm due to the wind & it hurts/kills your crop bc you weren't willing/able to pay for the higher priced
Monsanto seed.

I'm not even going to go off on how harmful all of this is to our environment. I'll stick to how it hurts the small family farmer that can't afford the higher cost of seeds today that also comes w/ a higher px of herbicide.
For those of you that aren't aware, some states have restrictions on foreigners buying agriculture land in their state. Missouri passed a law in 2013 that allowed
1% of Missouri’s agricultural land to come under foreign ownership. This was done so that a Chinese company could buy Smithfield Foods.
stltoday.com/business/local…
What is our #moleg really dong to help small family farmers and the community in which they live? Please tell me as I want some good news.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mary Waggener

Mary Waggener Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marywag2947

11 Feb
@NewsHour had a segment last night on how WV decided not to go w/ the CVS/Walgreens plan proposed by the fed's. They decided to send vaccines to independent pharmacies bc it's a rural state & small pharmacies are located where many live. WV has ⬆️ % of ppl that hv been vaccinated
Here is an article that explains WV's rollout of vaccines. nationalinterest.org/blog/coronavir…
How urban areas are covered by the state vaccine rollout policy:
Doses for eligible older West Virginians are being delivered to primary care providers, community health centers, and local health departments.
Read 10 tweets
6 Feb
“US Health in International Perspective: Shorter Lives, Poorer Health.”

“[T]he largest obstacle to addressing the US health disadvantage is not a lack of evidence or uncertainty about effective interventions but limited political support among both the public and policymakers to
enact the policies and commit the necessary resources to implement them.”

"There’s a certain amount of denial among the policymakers. What we were explaining ran so counter to the narrative that many politicians have of American exceptionalism and too many believe that, if
you’re a corporate executive or a billionaire, you’re fine.”

“Even with Covid, the US sees itself as a particular model and what happens elsewhere is kind of irrelevant. We are, after all, the greatest country in the world, the richest and the greatest with the greatest health
Read 15 tweets
2 Feb
#Missouri government is fiscally irresponsible with our tax dollars!

The supplemental spending bill proposed by the governor "includes money to hire two attorneys and pay other increased costs as the Administrative Hearing Commission considers more than 850 appeals from +
companies denied licenses to grow, process and sell medical marijuana."
The state will "demand repayment of any unemployment money it paid in error to residents since the COVID-19 pandemic began — regardless of whether the overpayments came from state or federal funds."
Read 7 tweets
14 Jan
#Missouri, our senator has his explanation for objecting to the electoral college votes published in a newspaper in deep red SEMO.
History of electoral vote challenges in congress.
npr.org/2021/01/05/952…
A letter to the editor that I submitted over a week ago was also published in the paper yesterday. It's also about the integrity of our elections. I called on Senators Blunt and Hawley, along w/ Rep. Jason Smith, to support a quick passage of the #ForThePeopleAct.
Read 4 tweets
10 Dec 20
@RepJasonSmith will continue to vote against legislation that benefits his constituents, while supporting reactionary Republicans that are working to dismantle our democracy.

THREAD Image
Appropriation bill that he voted against, which the president signed. Image
He voted against the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act which was signed by the president. Image
Read 11 tweets
4 Feb 20
#Missouri #moleg

Peter Merideth (HD80):

“Just watched as numerous reps voted yes on a bill passing through committee that they don’t support. It’s so frustrating how the budget chair and leadership use their leverage on other issues to make members support things
they know are bad policy.

The bill was to take about 3% of the SLPS and KCP budgets and transfer it to the charter schools in their districts. The argument for doing so being that it makes all of the per pupil dollars follow the students that go to the charter schools
(currently a small share of local dollars stays with the districts).

While this change sounds fair and “equal,” the problem is it’s not so simple to think that charters and traditional public schools have all the same costs and therefore deserve all the same public funding.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!