“Senior UK govt ministers” have contacted both the EU commission and EU member states about renegotiating the EU-UK trade deal agreed 6 weeks ago at Christmas.
2/
The term being used by UK govt in communications with the EU is “refinements”.
However UK is essentially requesting the EU (& it’s member states) to reopen the treaty for renegotiation.
EU Member states have been careful not to comment on this publicly.
3/
Understood that the UK govt has a “shopping list” of items that they are requesting “refinements” to in the EU-UK Treaty.
These include, but are not limited to, Northern Ireland & the fishing industry.
4/
EU understood to have “already rejected” a plea by the UK govt for “a 2 year extension to the ‘Grace Period’ for Northern Ireland” in communications with UK govt representatives.
5/
I’m assuming it’s no coincidence that pro UK govt media have decided today - of all days - to promote this:
Every single group, demographic or sector campaigning for their freedom of movement are literally reinforcing the message that what they have now is worse than before...
...and remainers are complaining?
3/
..and if musicians do get “special freedom of movement treatment” then what happens next..?
...everyone will want it.
This is how we get back in - by creating ambassadors for alignment & rejoin.
So everyone come on & back the musicians and rejoin will have the best tunes..
UK govt provided “false information” to British seafood & fishing industries based on misunderstanding of how EU 3rd country rules would apply to UK exporters.
Such a situation made it “impossible for industry to adequately prepare” even had they followed govt advice.
2/
It seems that only “this week” did the ministry responsible for fishing - DEFRA - confirm to UK fishing industry that exporting live catch from UK class B waters would now “no longer be possible”.
This was a full 5 weeks after UK left EU single market on 1st January 2021.
3/
The misunderstanding appears to have risen as many in the British fishing industry believed UK govt advice instead of an official EU communication to the UK seafood industry body in December which gained less media traction.
1. Its aimed at media - its not govt language 2. Its to prepare way to invoke art. 16 3. Gove has never publicly accepted the Good Friday Agreement 4. Ultimate aim is to feed 🇬🇧nationalism - & friction in 🇮🇪 & 🇪🇺
The letter is final comfirmation - if any still needed - that the EU is dealing with a "bad faith actor".
Up till now EU has tried to deal with the UK a bit like an applicant country in reverse. Attempting to grow a strong trade relationship that could lead to closer ties.
I know this is boring as I've been saying this for years now.
Brexit has become a proxy for patriotism. The anti-europeanism is both its point & only reward.
So don't kid yourselves they'll be a 2nd referendum anytime soon.
The way back is only thru alignment & competent govt.
2/
Dealing with remainers who consider such talk traitorous is weary but neccessary.
The faster you get to competence, the quicker you get to alignment - which is the ONLY way back.
The Rejoin campaign thus can't really be - publicly - about Rejoin for the next couple of years.
This thread has engendered some term confusion, so:
“The patriot is proud of his country for what it does, the nationalist is proud of his country no matter what it does; the first creates a feeling of responsibility, the second a feeling of blind arrogance that leads to war.”
EU & US do deal to open up EU financial markets to US banks.
As UK banks have only time limited access to EU financial markets it is likely that without a deal UK clearing banks will lose out to EU & US banks putting at risk London’s role as dominant financial centre.
2/
Understand that the agreement requires US banks to adhere to EU risk management requirements - something that the UK wanted to avoid due to “sovereignty issues”.
3/
EU concerned with avoiding another financial turbulence like the 2007 global crisis and in maintaining EU banks competing advantage - so the EU-US agreement is considered a key part of this plan.
It took me years in academia to realise that many “average Universities” are often actually better than elite Unis.
Elite unis business model is, in many subjects, effectively a “CV branding” process for a specific minority of intelligent children of highly privileged top 5%.
2/
It’s why you see a far greater focus on humanities among this particular cohort at elite unis than elsewhere. It’s also why states which have this elite uni model - US & UK - rely on foreign students in sciences at elite unis than elsewhere.
3/
I can’t be the only academic to notice that at the average uni where I am the privileged students all seem to be ahead of the rest of the class in the 1st year but regress to the mean by the end.