Including the 91 cases from the April OCI outbreak, there were 169 COVID cases in Ontario jails from March to November. Since Dec. there have been at least ten outbreaks. A key difference is a rising jail population. thestar.com/content/thesta…
An initial drop of up to 32 percent is now around 15 percent. And last month at least five jails were running overcapacity. Two of them, Maplehurst and Thunder Bay jail, are still in major outbreaks.
Depopulation was touted as a significant part of the COVID-19 in jails safety plan, but it's been declining in recent months. And duty counsel report a change in attitude from the early days of the pandemic around the need to keep ppl out of custody where possible.
Here is the latest COVID-19 update from the ministry as of Feb. 8:
105 active cases at Maplehurst (I count 205 total inmate cases since the outbreak, though not all will be from the outbreak, some are likely new admissions)
27 at Thunder Bay Jail
25 at Vanier
7 at Central East
6 at Elgin-Middlesex
2 at Thunder Bay CC
1 at Sarnia
All of these are considered outbreaks.
There are also:
4 cases at Ottawa-Carleton
2 at Quinte
3 at Toronto East
2 at South West
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Depopulation was touted as a major part of the safety plan. This story looks at some of the reasons why the population has gone up (one is that the sense of urgency around keeping people of out of custody where possible seems to have changed)
JAIL COVID UPDATE: The case numbers from the weekend are not yet available online but I understand that there is now an outbreak at Vanier Centre for Women, with 9 inmate cases. Meanwhile, Maplehurst has had 116 inmate cases (including 1 who works in the kitchen), 62 staff cases
According to a memo, the union is concerned about the Maplehurst cases being linked to continued audio/video court appearances. They want those to be stopped for 14 days, or at least stopped for inmates who are positive. (I can imagine the response to this).
Outbreak at the Central East Correctional Centre in Lindsay per the local public health unit today. Heard from a source that it's three or four people in a segregation unit.
The Crown's closing arguments begin today (they were supposed to start at 9:30 but we haven't yet). For the defence arguments yesterday, my thread is here:
Okay looks like we are close to starting. For a preview of where the Crown is likely going, here is what their key expert said: thestar.com/news/gta/2020/…
And here is my wrap on the four days of cross-examination by the Crown of the defence's key expert Dr. Alexander Westphal: thestar.com/news/gta/2020/…
Good morning. We are back for the final two days of Alek Minassian's trial for the first-degree murder of Ji Hun Kim, So He Chung, Anne Marie D’Amico, Andrea Bradden, Chul Min (Eddie) Kang, Renuka Amarasingha, Dorothy Sewell, Geraldine Brady, Munir Najjar, and Betty Forsyth.
Today we will be hearing closing arguments from the defence, led by Boris Bytensky. He will be arguing Minassian should be found not criminally responsible because his form of autism spectrum disorder rendered him unable to know what he did was morally wrong.
We heard on the last day of evidence that this argument comes down to what the defence is saying was a "split-second decision" on April 23 ,2018 by Minassian to make his long-planned mass killing a reality.
Back at what is looking like the tail end of evidence at Alek Minassian's trial for the Toronto van attack. The defence has a couple more questions for Dr. Scott Woodside then he'll be done cross.
Defence says Woodside didn't make recordings of his interviews with Minassian, but did anyone else?
Woodside says no.
Now back to talking about the notes vs the report. Did you only make one page of notes for the last five hours of your interview with Minassian?
Woodside says defence has misunderstood if that's what he thinks.
Woodside said Minassian did say he wanted to kill more women, though he knew it would be random.
Defence: He saw the group of people at Yonge and Finch and started the attack.
Woodside: He thought 20 kills would be high.
Defence: We don't know when he was thinking that
Woodside said it was part of his account of what he was thinking at the time. Doesn't think he prompted it with a question.
Defence: He was in the second lane from the right. When the light turned green he "floored it" and drove into the people.
Defence: That was a split second decision. The decision to start in that place was a split second.
Woodside agrees.
Defence: Unlike the main plan which he had days, weeks, year to think about, the decision to actually drive on the sidewalk was made "almost instantly."