1. As I noted at the DuPage fairgrounds yesterday, we have to play the cards we have, not the cards we wish we had. My height and vertical leap means I won't ever dunk a basketball. The process of vaccine rollout to date has created similar near-term challenges.
2. Among those issues is the lack of any federal coordination during the prior administration. From PPE to ventilators to testing to vaccines, states had to compete with each other rather than work collaboratively to crush the virus.
3. That is starting to improve, but public health officials are still grappling with multiple databases, supply channels and vendors who are not all in sync. Different definitions of 1A, 1B by region, different ability to get yourself on relevant databases are the result.
4. Please don't take this out on public health officials. None of them are happy with the number of COVID cases, nor the vaccine supply they have available. All are working hard to address a problem that is as much a public health crisis as a political one.
5. They have more responsibility than authority and are making the most of that situation. Show them some love and patience as they grapple with the cards they have been dealt.
6. And keep in mind that our metrics of success aren't perfect. Maximizing the % of a population that is vaccinated isn't exactly the same as minimizing spread given the ranges of living / work situations that different human beings have.
7. That's why this is both a public health AND political problem. A bus driver working 2 shifts a day is going to be harder to schedule a vaccination appointment for than a wealthy senior citizen who spends all day at home. But they also present very different rates of spread.
8. There is no "right" answer to that trade off. But please appreciate that good, well intentioned people are trying to manage those equities as best they can. It's a hard job, and we owe them our thanks.
9. And while some regions are doing a much better job than others at getting "shots into arms" let's all make sure we measure success in absolute rather than relative terms. Crushing COVID depends not on my county doing better than your county, but on all of us working together.
10. This will get easier as more vaccines come to market, as production ramps up and as more federal coordination comes into play with the Biden administration. Until then, be patient.
11. And once we're through this, let's not forget this moment. There are consequences of starving our public health system and failing to provide resources to the local government agencies that are on the frontlines of this pandemic. We can - and must - do better. /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
MTG short take: values, morals, hopes and dreams that are universally shared by Americans across the political spectrum are only "partisan" in the sense that they are wholly rejected by majorities of the @HouseGOP.
That is cause for optimism insofar as the country is not nearly as polarized as it looks from within DC. But it's cause for great sadness for what it means about a once great political party.
The @GOP - a party that emerged to stop the spread of slavery, that gave our country the great gift of Abraham Lincoln - still has registered voters who are pro-decency, pro-equality, pro-science, pro-market, pro-truth.
This is worth the read. It is the natural result of the fact that a transition to clean energy is a huge labor productivity enhancer. (Eg, many more MWH per hour of labor.) That is good for the economy but will create temporary labor dislocations.
To be clear, there is a lot more in this story as well, and I wish we'd stop talking about highly technical jobs as an alternative to being a barista. It's an extremely patronizing view of the American worker.
But the core issue here derives from the fact that old, dirty energy sources are really OPERATING labor intensive. New clean sources require a surge in construction jobs but much less operating labor.
There are some really remarkable graphics in this article, but I have a pet peeve with this sentence: hcn.org/issues/53.2/in…
There is this narrative that coal is cheap, and would still be dominant but for falling natural gas prices and clean energy tax credits. That simply isn't true. Coal hasn't been cheap since the Clean Air Act was passed. It's been slowly dying for decades.
Coal is only cheap if we're willing to let it be dirty. Get rid of scrubbers, baghouses, stop caring about acid rain and asthma and you can build a cheap coal plant. We haven't tolerated that since the CAA. Thankfully.
This article is spot on. FERC has the potential to be one of the most impactful climate agencies in the Biden administration. Look forward to working with them. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
That's in part because so many of the barriers to deploying cleaner, cheaper energy sit at the nexus between state and federal policy. @FERChatterjee is exactly right that FERC uniquely has the ability to free up (some) of those barriers.
But it's also because historically, FERC has done more to green our electric grid than any other agency. Order 888 (coupled with the '92 EPACT) is the primary reason why our grid emits 900 lb CO2/MWh today instead of 1300 it did then.
Expect to see a lot more stories like this. But let's also use this to have a more sophisticated conversation about why the rising tide of cheaper, cleaner energy - like all prior energy transitions - doesn't necessarily lift all boats. Brief thread: theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/ne…
1/ First to state the obvious: the domestic fossil fuel industry in the US wouldn't exist without massive subsidies. $650B/year according to the IMF. imf.org/en/Publication…
2/ That in turn means that the transition to cleaner, cheaper energy is delayed by those market distortions. Taking away the subsidies is smart economic and environmental policy. It is FANTASTIC that @POTUS is doing so.
@RepJasonSmith. Your staffer didn't get this email from @RepCindyAxne's staffer because you're a Republican. It came to you because you earned your power through a democratic election and then used that power to try and overturn our democracy. Not once, but three times.
First, when you signed onto the Amicus brief to the Supreme Court asking them to throw out the certified results of free and fair elections in GA, MI, PA and WI. projects.propublica.org/represent/memb…
Second, when you voted to reject the will of the voters in Arizona in the late hours on January 6th, AFTER terrorists had attacked the Capitol seeking to accomplish the same anti-democratic ends. clerk.house.gov/evs/2021/roll0…