1. The #StopTheSteaI hashtag and movement were being pushed and fueled by a broad spectrum of actors, in coordinated and uncoordinated ways.
Everyone from extremists/white supremacist groups to Trump campaign people/Trump family members/members of Congress.
Trump and members of Congress gave it legitimacy. They took the fever dream of conspiracy theories and disinformation and made it real for regular Americans.
This was a parallel world that existed divorced from reality. Reading the timeline, you get swept up in the fervor behind it and key dates -- the Dec. 12 rally, Jan. 6 -- that mean totally different things or nothing at all in the real world.
For example, on Nov. 7 there were widespread public celebrations for Biden's declared victory across the country, but you'd hardly know it in the online MAGA world, where "Stop the Steal" was gathering steam.
Also almost entirely missing: the pandemic.
There is a line about how you need to sign a waiver about COVID liabilities to attend one of these MAGA rallies, but that's about it.
The timeline also knocks you over the head with how it was all out there in the open. Being planned and fomented before our eyes, if you knew where to look -- which didn't take much sleuthing.
It also reveals how not spontaneous any of this was.
It was developing for months -- each event and website building off each other.
You also get some sense of the appetite for violence growing. The language gets more violent from key leaders like Lin Wood, Steve Bannon, and the leader of the Oath Keepers.
In the end, it left me with a question: Where does all of that energy and rage go? What happens next? I've listened/read a few things about how Qanon has made sense of the world since, etc. But I don't think we know. Trump is golfing in Florida. What does everyone else do?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"'It’s a recipe for madness,' said Laurel Elder, a political scientist at Hartwick College in New York who has been studying the mental health effects of parenting in the pandemic." nytimes.com/interactive/20…
I said to my husband last week: "It would be pretty weird if I wasn't miserable ... I have all of the ingredients for it."
And I must add the required caveat: I am extremely grateful too. For my family's health, my job, etc. I know how lucky I am. But, you can be extremely fortunate and still be struggling during these times.
As the confirmation hearing for retired Gen. #LloydAustin gets underway, here's a roundup of what should be covered and what he will face as defense secretary. justsecurity.org/74245/what-sho…
"Does Austin still see himself as an apolitical actor removed from the politics of policymaking, or does he believe that accepting a Cabinet nomination places him squarely in the political realm?" -- @jblankshain
"At Austin’s hearing it will not be enough to accept the tired statements of ‘this is not who we are’ or that ‘the military has zero tolerance’ on issues of gender discrimination, but to pinpoint exactly how he proposes to bring real change to the military." -- @Jason_K_Dempsey
A sr military official told me this morning: "I can't underscore the importance of the message sent yesterday from the Joint Chiefs of Staff ...
" ... It might not change the hard-core believers. Those who are deeply radicalized can't be reached. But it will be heard by the middle."
Part of that message: "the U.S. military will ... remain fully committed to protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."
Thank you to all of our fantastic writers and contributors.
It is such a joy to collaborate with you, bringing your ideas and insights to our audience.
Thank you to our amazing roster of editors, who help guide our coverage and identify new, important voices to weigh in on today's national security issues. justsecurity.org/wp-content/upl…
Kids don't need to hear that Eliquis may cause bleeding while watching the Macy's Day Parade.
“Under current law, drug manufacturers are allowed to deduct the cost of advertising expenses from federal taxes.”
“Advertising expenses by pharmaceutical drug manufacturers have more than quadrupled over the past two decades, rising from $1.3 billion in 1997 to $6 billion in 2016.”