This year will see epochal #DeFi boom: BTC $100k, ETH $10k - ending in a bust (dotcom bubble).
Then a long winter, when hardy survivors can be picked up at fire sale prices.
And then, come the 2030s - just like software 20 years ago - crypto will "eat the world." #prediction
This is extremely specific and unlikely to happen in quite this way, but I do think that generally, this is what will actually happen. Crypto is replicating all the institutions and infrastructure of the modern economy. But this boom came just a bit too early to actualize rn.
Last major digital asset to "moon" will be "land". Don't know if urbit will dominate, but does have "first mover" advantage. Stars currently worth ~$5,000, might increase 100x within the decade. Window of opportunity for competitors is narrowing fast (Metcalfe's Law).
Yes, I know urbit is currently unusable for normies. Doesn't matter. If anything, that's feature, not bug, since it allows an "elect" to seize its "commanding heights". Accessibility will improve with time and traffic will follow.
People overestimate the importance of quality; it can be fixed, whereas network effect is permanent boost. I recall a friend c.2010 claiming Facebook would fail because of its, quote, "atrocious codebase." This is also why ETH will win. "Bad restaurant - too crowded" syndrome.
Long-term steady state is official national cryptos with smart contracts replacing law (e.g. taxes on commercial transactions & exchanges for other cryptos i.e. "crypto flight"). All sales already, by law, have to occur in the national currency.
Gold as percentage of world wealth has declined inexorably over the centuries - prices remained steady since 1550, while GDP grew much more rapidly than gold production. Meanwhile, silver plummeted even relative to gold over the longue durée.
This is relevant to the thread, who can guess why.
That is, over the long-term, Bitcoin will be the road to (crypto-)penury.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Russia lost ~250,000 soldiers to date, but in a war of attrition, the central question is ratios and their dynamics.
Far less attention devoted to Ukraine, but that's more important, because manpower is a bigger constraint for it (FWIW my estimate is 2x * UAlosses = ~150,000).
The "rate of advance" that people soy over is mostly irrelevant (except insofar as it hints at underlying manpower ratios, where Russia is slowly gaining in relative terms).
Currently it seems Russia recruits 30k & Ukraine 20k per month.
More, perhaps many more Russians, die. (Differential is unclear though, as in, is it 1.5x or 3x?; Russian advances means many Ukrainian bodies left behind won't be registered).
🇺🇸🇮🇱 I call Israel to join the US as the 51st state
(1) This would mostly solve Middle East geopolitics. The US extends its security umbrella to Israel (formalizing what we all know to be a de facto reality anyway) while constraining independent Israeli adventurism.
(2) Huge human capital boost to the US as 3M Ashkenazi Jews get full immediate access to its labor markets. American tech lead further augmented as Israel's R&D sector which punches well above its weight integrates into its technocapital machine.
(3) In particular, the Arsenal of Democracy is augmented disproportionately to just the GDP and human capital increase from adding Israel, in light of Israel's dense forest of military tech companies (esp. in drones and missile defense).
I'll be posting live coverage of interesting developments in the Russian elections here.
(Within a specific definition of "interesting", obviously said term doesn't apply to its outcome).
Result from exit poll at Russian Embassy in Prague (via Max Kats):
* Davankov - 66.5%
* Putin - 4.1%
* Spoiled ballot: 24.8%
Obviously, Prague is not representative of Russia; extremely so. And obviously you'd need to be "bold" to say you voted for Putin in a country where public support for Z is literally criminal. Still, safe to say pocket liberal candidate Davankov sweeps the board in most of the West.
This would be a change from previous elections, in which Putin/United Russia polled competitively against the "liberal" placeholder in 2012, 2016, 2018, etc, winning in most places outside the Anglosphere.
*
*
Russian Embassies abroad tallied the vote fairly in past elections. I wonder whether this will still be true this time round in light of the stupendous tilt against Putin that has unsurprisingly developed after the war. The differentials - 10% (?) for Putin in Western Europe and the US, 80% in Russia - would come off as a bit weird.akarlin.com/prokhorov-pres… akarlin.com/russian-global…
Opinion Polls: A List
Compendium here:
VCIOM:
Putin consistently at 75%, Davankov up to 6%
State owned pollster
FOM:
Putin 80.8%, Kharitonov 5.7%, Slutsky 5.6%, Davankov 4.6% / turnout 69.8%
(This looks remarkably like kremlins' optimal result. Also unlike its standard polls has no demographic breakdowns).
State owned pollster
Levada: Curiously did not actually do a poll on Presidential elections - only on party popularity.
Private pollsters and "foreign agent"
Russian Field: Neither did they! Again, only question on parties.
Private pollster
(This is curious and notable because Levada & Russian Field are the two liberal-leaning opinion pollsters).
ExtremeScan:
New polling outfit, seems very oppositionist.
Putin 63% (down from 69% in Jan, with a notable 5% pt decline right after Navalny's death), Davonkov 4%
IRPZ
Obscure pollster cited by Boris Nadezhdin; of those decided:
Putin 73.1%, Davankov 11.9%, Kharitonov 6.8%, Slutsky 4.2%, spoiled 4.0% / 20% remain undecided
This is one of the best maps for groking why colonialism could work c.1900 and one of the reasons it became unsustainable later on, and why why Europe's prominence in particular declined relative to both the US & the Rest.
France/Britain & US have ~equal population to Latam and Africa, respectively.
Why Turks once viewed Greeks as a real threat, difference when ratio is 1:1.7 vs. 1:6. akarlin.com/turkey-populat…
Conversely, imagine populations of Europeans had they kept their "weight" constant relative to Third World, proxied by say India: 200-300M Germans, Italians, French, English each.
Germany + France > USA. About as many ethnic Russians as Americans. Ofc impact on influence.
(1) Almost certainly ordered or okayed by Putin. In retrospect, the theory that Navalny's disappearance in December was a trial balloon to gauge the public reaction - found to be encouragingly lackluster - to harsher measures has been vindicated.
(2) The usual amusing preoccupation with symbolic dates, exactly one month before the Presidential elections (to which Navalny represented ~zero threat).
(3) But more amusing still is that Putin did it while poor @TuckerCarlson is performing cartwheels trying to humanize Russia for the American rightoid audience.
Just a never-ending series of humiliations for him - but what's the actual point?!
But when tested as part of a list experiment, it plummets to 70%!
In list surveys there's a control and a treatment group which get a set of non-sensitive questions, but the control group also gets one "controversial" item. The respondents then say how many of the questions they agree with without actually ever answering the controversial one.