The ONS considered 5 difference concepts of sex:
Sex registered at birth,
Sex recorded on birth certificate,
Sex recorded on legal/official documents,
living / presenting sex,
Self-identified sex.
/2
A big part of their evidence for why asking 'sex registered at birth' was unacceptable was that trans people won't like it and might boycott the Census. /3
From this they concluded "The highest negative impact on accuracy & reliability is anticipated if sex registered at birth was collected due to the likely negative impact on response rates caused by the perceived invasion of privacy" /4
and that "The data need [for birth sex] is not considered to be strong enough to justify collecting this" /5
So what was this important and influential piece of research they did to gauge the response of the trans community and women? /6
They interviewed 52 people; cisgender, transgender and trans allies.
.... some members of women's groups /7
They don't go into details but we know from elsewhere:
"participants were recruited through existing databases from those who had ‘opted-in’ to take part in future research *and via a professional agency*".
Who is this professional agency that supplies trans & trans allies? /8
And are these voices representative of ordinary trans people or are they selected trans activist voices? How many were there? Perhaps a dozen of each?
So many questions unanswered. /9
But these dozen or so views was enough to convince the ONS there was a risk of boycott if they asked people what sex they were born /10
Who were the 'women's groups' they interviewed to make sure they heard the other side?
Not us.... not any of the gender critical groups in fact.... /11
Again, they don't give detail in the report but we know from elsewhere that "14 women’s groups were represented, e.g.: Women’s league for peace and freedom, MIND Women's forum, Swarm Association, Women's Equality Party; amongst others)" /12
Has this really been a fair and transparent assessment by an independent organisation whose purpose is to collect accurate data?
We don't think so, do you? /13
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING: It has emerged that the @ONS has reversed its decision not to allow self-identified answers to the sex question in next month’s Census /1
The UK’s Chief Statistician, Professor Ian Diamond, recently confirmed on @bbcr4today the question “what is your sex” should be answered according to someone’s LEGAL SEX, and not self-ID /2
On 22 January, he told @bbcr4today that “The sex question is very simply your legal sex, there is then subsequently a question later which asks about gender identity” /3 fairplayforwomen.com/census-sex-que…
NEW: Some organisations are doing a bad job by mixing up sex and gender identity, others are do better by collecting data separately on both. The mix-up and inconsistency means valuable data gets lost and false assumptions get made /1
The prison service records both sex AND gender identity. But while things have improved more needs to change. Under current methodology trans people who have changed the sex on their birth certificate by obtaining GRC not appear in the annual figures for transgender prisoners /2
This means we don’t have accurate numbers for how many male-born transgender prisoners are currently in women’s prisons /3
The UK’s National Statistician and head of the ONS, Professor Ian Diamond, has confirmed that the question in the Census “what is your sex” should be answered according to someone’s legal sex, and not a self-declared gender identity. /1
In an interview on BBC Radio 4’s Today program he said:
“The question on sex is very simply your legal sex, there is then subsequently a question later which asks people over 16 the identity of their gender.
/2
This marks a change from 2011 guidance on how to answer “what is your sex”.
In 2011 trans people were told they could answer this according to how they identify. Since then an additional question has been added to the Census that allows people to record identity separately /3
Calls to legally recognise ‘non-binary’ people could be a back door to the erosion of single-sex spaces and services for women and girls. “Non-binary” is being used to divide the world into male and non-male – and women lose out /1
Stonewall are now calling for recognition of “non-binary” people in the Gender Recognition Act and in the Equality Act, as shown in their submissions to the current inquiry by the Women and Equalities Select Committee (WESC) /2
“Stonewall strongly believes that non-binary identities should be accommodated in a reformed GRA” /3
Transgender pressure groups, trans allies, trades unions & others are calling for clearer guidance on the single-sex exemptions in the Equality Act 2010. We agree. The Equality Act is clear, but the statutory guidance issued by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission is not /2
The calls are in evidence submitted to the current inquiry by the Women and Equalities Select Committee (WESC) into the government’s planned changes to the Gender Recognition Act /3
The use of 'Her phone' in the headline straight away implies to readers this is an unusual case of a female teenager who has committed the crime of accessing child pornography - a crime more commonly committed by members of the male sex /2
This is further substantiated by the word 'woman' in the first sentence of the text. This is a breach of the Editors Code on Accuracy because this is misleading. The individual involved was not born female and is in fact someone who was born male and now identifies as a woman /3