Good intent, but any plan for "peacefully preserving Taiwan's autonomy" that leaves out the cessation of Huawei sanctions and artificial chip shortages - ie ending TWs undeclared economic war on the mainland - will not lead to peace across the straits
At the end of the day, mainland China cares very little about what new names the DPP chooses for a random memorial. It cares much much MUCH more about TW choking its electronics industry and lobbying for sanctions on its chip designers and fabs
TWs hypocritical and self-destructive calls for "shifting supply chains out of China" while making 27% of its GDP from exports to China has not gone unnoticed in Beijing. The new consensus in the PRC govt is that TW politics has become permanently irrational
With that, mainland China is forming two (not necessarily exclusive) plans: a peaceful one to wean itself off TWs technological inputs, and a less peaceful one that kinetically reunifies the island and secures its capabilities
The simplest way for the US to lower tensions in the strait would be to lower the main land's risk perception around sourcing tech inputs from TW - either by removing sanctions + pledging not to egregiously sanction Chinese firms or by encouraging tech diffusion into China
Given Xi and Biden's joint emphasis on maintaining a stable global order, I'm pretty sure the mainland would be fine kicking the can down the road another few years if that were done in addition to the points raised in the CFR article
The challenge for the US will be to show Chinese policymakers that peacefully participating in the US-led global market will drive faster and more comprehensive development in China than the alternative. That bargain has been wearing thin for a range of reasons...
...And the TW chip embargo very well might be the last straw.
The scary part for the US is that many other countries are also getting frustrated with this arrangement as well, which means the entire US global system could rapidly reorient if China exits.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Getting a sense that the DPPs recent antics with TSMC are not being appreciated in the Biden admin, to say nothing of the EU
2/ The DPP is anxious because current trends that by 2025, China, the US, and/or Korea will be at or near parity with TSMC, and INDOPACOM will be unable to defend Taiwan even if it commits a sizeable % of its assets
3/ Which means if the DPP doesn't secure a hard security guarantee - something like a US tripwire on Taiwan in the next few years, they have no outs
This isn't good. Both China and the world benefit from the Chinese people having a global voice. Shutting off a channel - however imperfect - is counterproductive. Some of the discussions were finally improving as well, after the auntologist-led sessions of the past few days
What's more, encouraging mainlanders, HKers, and TWese to commingle and chat is the best way to heal the divides that feed political extremism on both sides of the strait.
It can create a lasting political consensus for solving the cross-straits problem without firing a shot, as people discover the other side is not monsters drawn out of a nightmare but ordinary people whose dreams are similar to their own.
And it's what the DPP privately communicated to the US during a talk about auto chip shortages yesterday - which, curiously, did not focus on auto chips and did not speak to the issue of prioritizing their production
This counterintuitive result is mainly because Taiwan island has nearly 8x as many soldiers per capita as mainland China (290k soldiers / 23m people vs 2m soldiers across 1.3b people).
2/ Once, at a reception, caught a bunch of HK girls gossiping about a mainland girl's lack of taste. "She's wearing so much Gucci. Doesn't she know that people who have been properly raised, wear Marni for casual and Valentino or Chloe for things like this?"
3/ Had a HK banker unironically tell me that "people like us are just working class, man" as he blew tens of thousands of HKD at a club.