I think people underrate the societal importance of us being post-scarcity for basically anything you can buy in a shipping container from 1,000+ manufacturers in, without loss of generality, China.
I broke a dish recently and was mortified, then remembered that human attention about the dish is now much more expensive than the dish itself.

This was not true when I was growing up, surrounded with non-negligible-marginal-cost dishes.
(You can pay more than effectively nothing for a dish, but the thing you're buying is in large part the fact of having paid more than effectively nothing for a dish. The unscarce dishes are perfectly servicable dishes and in many cases actually physically indistinguishable.)
"Can you put a number on 'effectively nothing'?"

It's ~$2 for a glass or ceramicware plate, trivially, and falling. The plate literally costs less than the protein on top of it. Middle class could go 100% Thor ("The mashed potatoes was excellent. *smash* Another!") + not notice.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Patrick McKenzie

Patrick McKenzie Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @patio11

12 Feb
The set of things that appear hard and the set of things that are actually hard overlap a lot less than one would expect.

This is something I have believed a long time, but which continues to surprise me when I try new appears-to-be-hard things.
The best *systematic* explanation of a major difference I've seen is here: paulgraham.com/schlep.html
My far less systematic version: "If I need X's cooperation to do Y, and X would give that cooperation to a professional who possessed A, B, and C... is that the minimum possible set of requirements, truly, and could I bet that professional in, say, two $UNITS of determined work."
Read 5 tweets
9 Feb
Seems like I've got the update baton for Day 26 of VaccinateCA.com . Here's what we did today to get Californians accurate info on the availability of the vaccine:

* Called hundreds of pharmacies and wrote down what they said for publication on site.
* Worked on redesign of our calling app. On Day 1 it was a one-size-fits-all experience; we're just calling about the vaccine, right?

Soon we'll have multiple location types (pharmacies, doctors offices, etc), multiple call goals (discovery, refresh of info, QA, debugging), ...
... multiple types of callers (senior ones with charm and ability to improvise, fresh volunteers still getting used to the phone, call center workers in various places, etc).

And so we want to make the calling app more usable and more configurable by our project, to handle these
Read 6 tweets
8 Feb
On the state and tech platforms:

"The state is the monopolized use of violence" the traditional definition, but I think "The state is that which is maximally legible to the state" a more useful operational definition, and other functions are just epiphenomena of that legibility.
This is true both historically (various religious organizations in various places had the act of censusing down before local states did; those pretty reliably got co-opted or read-into-the-state because, again, legibility is the core function) and, I think, more recently.
One could make some extremely pointed observations about the financial system here, and those pointed observations would not be incorrect. It's the thing the cryptocurrency enthusiasts are probably most correct about.

Transactions and identity are not sole axes of legibility.
Read 4 tweets
6 Feb
Wowza now is this an interesting business model: HP "Instant Ink."
In lieu of selling you ink and having you own the ink, we will sell you the thing you actually want, which is printing capacity. We will forward-deploy some compute and chemicals at your printer to fulfill this.

Some geeks are going to *hate* this but it's almost obviously good?
"Patrick why would a consumer ever want that."

Among many other things, because it allows a capital stack arbitrage similar to how consumers get very cheap access to cell phones without owning "cell phone ink."

HP can use your commitment to print in future to fund printer, etc.
Read 10 tweets
6 Feb
If you'd like to help Californians get information to get the vaccine, we'd be happy to have you help call around for it. airtable.com/shraGLvYdZRcUn…

We even have training now, thanks to somebody who joined and said ~ "Oh goodness, you are clearly new at this. I am not. Let's go."
I cannot express how fortunate I feel to work with this group of people.
Read 6 tweets
5 Feb
Well either we're a relatively efficient way to find vaccine or a very inefficient way to find horse hospitals. Currently up to three.
New interview question for PMs: "Suppose you have nothing but a California phone book but have no metadata about institutions. Describe a way to find all the horse hospitals."
Small brain: grep for horse hospital
Big brain: call all the hospitals, ask about horses.
Galaxy brain: convince VaccinateCA there is a non-zero chance a horse hospital would get a shipment of covid-19 vaccine, then just ask nicely "So can I get a list of horse hospitals."
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!