Intensity/duration caps were discussed in the report.
NOT age caps.
It’s reasonable to place limits, but AGE shouldn’t be the limiting factor.
That’s not a needs-based approach.
8/12
The determination of need process is a major concern.
@ToddSmithPC wants to put all the power into the hands of a Care Coordinator to assign funding.
A clinician needs to be more involved if we want to ensure needs can actually be met.
9/12
If the funding allotment is disputed, there needs to be a mechanism to appeal the decision.
Clinical assessment of an autistic child should be weighed HIGHER than the button-clicking of a bureaucrat.
Having a dispute mechanism in place could give families piece of mind.
10/12
When @ToddSmithPC says no government has gotten this right - he’s not wrong.
If @ONgov wants to finally fix this thing, it’s time to address the reasonable concerns that parents have.
11/12
With a $600 million budget, a proper needs-assessment, reasonable controls, and therapeutic options, the autism program could finally be something that actually works.
Changes from last month:
- 555 new registrations
- 0 new Childhood Budget invites
- 1152 new interim one-time funding invites
The situation is a lot messier than @ToddSmithPC & his team are letting on.
1/6
First, here’s the summary chart of all the posted numbers since the format change last year. @ChildrenON only posts current numbers, preventing anyone from looking for trends unless you keep track yourself.
Not exactly the transparency @ToddSmithPC promised.
2/6
What @ChildrenON is NOT telling you is how much crossover there is between the groups, and how they’re not displaying that at ALL with their posted numbers.
3/6
Three. @ottawa_asd_mum “With help, and practice we are learning to connect. Jack approaches the wall and knocks a brick or two down. And we can see him, smiling back.” link.medium.com/K74r150YCV