8/The more bubbles Bitcoin recovers from, the more people realize that it's for real. And the more people will be comfortable having a little of their wealth in crypto. And thus the price will rise, and volatility will be compensated by higher long-term returns!
9/So what about the long-term price of Bitcoin? Where does its fundamental value come from?
Bitcoin is "digital gold"...people view it as a hedge against the breakdown of the global financial/regulatory system.
13/Basically, these uses give Bitcoin a fundamental value. Bubbles deter people (temporarily) from recognizing that value. But as they eventually stop worrying about the next bubble, the market value rises, and provides a positive expected return.
14/Could Bitcoin ever die? Yes, in theory. The technology could turn out to have unexpected flaws.
15/Or governments could unite and criminalize Bitcoin!
Seems very unlikely but the possibility should be mentioned.
16/NO financial asset in the world is safe from the risk of ruin. But barring these unlikely events, Bitcoin is basically unkillable. If its price goes down temporarily, it can just come back when people get interested in it again.
17/This is why you can't shitpost or denounce Bitcoin into oblivion. If you drive down its price with angry posts, it'll just bounce back at some point.
And that will redistribute money from people who listened to you to people who ignored you!
18/This is why I urge people NOT to think about Bitcoin in political terms. Do NOT view it as an evil libertarian plot to bring down government.
22/So Bitcoin -- and cryptocurrency in general -- appear to be here to stay. It's a new asset class, like digital gold. It's risky for sure, but bubbles will not kill it.
1/Today's Substack post is about Biden's chances of becoming a truly transformational president -- someone who will move U.S. economic policy onto a leftward track, as Reagan once moved it onto a rightward track.
2/Political scientist Stephen Skowronek has a theory that says we're due for a "reconstructive" President who will define a new paradigm for the next few decades.
3/Like most people, I thought Biden would be an incrementalist centrist who would get little done other than restoring competence and morality to the executive branch (and that alone would have been plenty of reason to vote for him!).
In today's @bopinion post, I explain why we need to do more than just give people cash. We need to make sure that everyone has access to affordable housing, health care, transportation, and nutritious food.
Whereas @elidourado focuses on using new *technology* to get low-income Americans the basic necessities of life, I argue that in the crucial areas of housing and health care and transportation, what's really needed is better *policy*.
2/In this thread, Olivier Blanchard uses Keynesian concepts such as the output gap and the fiscal multiplier to analyze the size of the bill, and argues that it's too large.
3/The fear is that if the bill is too large relative to the "output gap", then the economy will experience rapid inflation, forcing the Fed to raise interest rates, which will hurt growth.
2/John Kerry recently declared that we would do “so much economic investment made by people up and down the economic food chain that no future president can reverse it.”
That's going to require a lot of borrowing. But that's OK!
3/First of all, the actual amount Biden wants to spend -- $170 billion a year -- is very modest compared with the amount of government investment we did in the 50s and 60s.
2/How much does the average American know about Taiwan? Precious little, I'd say. Except for bubble tea, most Americans probably wouldn't even recognize Taiwanese food!
3/Some Americans think of Taiwan as part of China (China's government certainly thinks it is!). This may stop them from thinking about Taiwan as a country.
But most Taiwanese people don't consider themselves "Chinese" in the national sense.