On Nietzsche's "will to power", we might better rewrite it "will to power to will".

The accumulation of power can never be an end. An end entails rest, and power unexercised contradicts its essential act of motion towards end, so power at its end no longer exist.
First will (FW) knows last will (LW) and desires to become it, and so FW engenders motion to power. FW apprehends power, utilises it as its vehicle, and then fulfils LW. But if FW is will to become LW, what is LW?
LW is simply 'to be'. Hence, in formulation of Will's essence:

First Will (will to become) » Power (motion to end) » Last Will (will to be).

As will fulfils itself through power, it must retain power to maintain fulfilment. Therefore LW has being by virtue of attained power.
Now, having said all this, we must answer: what of divine power and will?

It is tempting to conclude that this indicates will must be in God, for if God is all-powerful, and power is fulfilment of will's end, then God must also be all-wilful.
The issue, however, is that it becomes paradoxical: will is a thing's first cause to power, and then by power, will completes in its end.

Making all-power cause to all-will is a reversal, but making all-will cause to all-power entails an initial point of no power in God.
So, we're wrong to say God is omnipotent?

No: as God 'simply is'—not in always have "willed to be", but rather "is always is"—there is no place for the will to be. Therefore God's "is-ness", prior to first and last will, necessitates infinite power for God's "is".
To elaborate: why "is-ness" becomes infinite power is because as oppose to 'being'—entailing the continuity of will's power to be and so its power defined by the fulfilment of will's end—God 'simply is'; God's "is" negates the convention of definition, is prior to its suggestion.
The simplicity of God "as is" is so extreme in its existence, surpassing will to be, that it is better to think that by a holy means ineffable to us, God "is", and because God is, his absoluteness causes infinite power to necessarily pour forth from nothingness to conjoin to God.
Of course, expression of sequence in God is not by time or step but by ineffable instance; about God always is omnipotence. But we mean to say that God is not sustained by powered self-will, but rather he is to which power wills itself.
So by God who is, power is always in infinite overflowing. In all things power sews the reflection of God and puts in all the will to be one with God, the true end beyond will and power, drawing all to sublimate becoming and being into is: the completion of will to power to will.
I found interpreting my precise thoughts on this into language very difficult, so I hope enough clarity is here to be understood.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexander Iulianus

Alexander Iulianus Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Apotheiite

15 Feb
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the
organized habits and opinions of the masses is an
important element in democratic society. Those who
manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute
an invisible government which is the true ruling
power of our country.
“We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized.
“Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. Our invisible governors are, in many cases, unaware of the identity of their fellow members in the inner cabinet.
Read 6 tweets
14 Feb
Greco-Roman culture is generally still thought as superstitious today. But as for the "aesthetics", it's quite rich to enter into the European world and ask why it doesn't love and respect your culture - a culture totally alien to Europeans - the same as it does its own.
If you have internalised a belief that European culture is superior to your own, then that is your own issue. There is no obligation on Europeans to reciprocate love just because of this, just as there is no obligation on other races to love Europe.
The "what about my people" plea is so pathetic and comes entirely from an internal presupposition of intrinsic cultural/racial inferiority. It presumes that European culture is superior and preferred, and then seeks to supplant it.
Read 4 tweets
22 Dec 20
SHORT THREAD CRITIQUE OF ST. THOMAS AQUINAS | SUMMA THEOLOGIAE | AGAINST LOVE & WILL IN GOD
--------
Article 1. Whether love exists in God?
I. To the contrary, I object:
1. God should not possess faculties. Faculties imply other, alike to how sight implies there is light for it to see. Any faculty possessed by God must be perfected, and so the perfect faculty must actualise its perfect end.
Therefore, by necessity of God possessing said faculty, he must actualise the perfect end of that faculty. The faculty of love necessitates either the reception or impartation of love, so he is made to either make beings which will love him and/or beings which he can love.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!