Steve Bezner Profile picture
14 Feb, 22 tweets, 4 min read
Up later than normal for me on a Saturday night, but just now having a chance to put down a few thoughts re: why evangelicalism has a habit of producing leaders who flame out. A few ideas:
1. “Success” is celebrated more than “faithfulness.” And “success” is almost always measured by the size of the gathering.
2. Speed is celebrated more than patience. In other words a church that “blows up” “overnight” will gain more notoriety than a church that grows a substantial ministry over years, decades, or even generations.
3. Youth is celebrated more than age. We want to believe that there are God-ordained leaders who are going to bring the next wave of faith into the up-and-coming generation.
4. We reward giftedness before we cultivate character. I have seen too many young leaders thrust into the spotlight, receiving attention and authority before they were emotionally ready.
5. We don’t have the structures built into our culture for accountability. When someone strays away, we often extend “grace” instead of leaning into conflict and confronting what needs to be exposed.
6. Emotional health isn’t usually emphasized in training or in professional development. Consequently, we often end up unintentionally perpetuating unhealthy mindsets/emotional responses within the church.
7. Charisma and confidence are almost always allowed to gloss over character flaws, because our model works best when a charismatic and confident individual is placed in front of the room. If not held accountable, the cycle can quickly and harmfully perpetuate itself.
8. Economics are a reality. No one likes to talk about this, but it is true. We can sometimes gloss over character with a charismatic leader because he/she “puts butts in the seats” and that translates into dollars.
Now think about how a combination of a few of these could quickly play out. A combination like these for example:

Youth
Emotional immaturity
Charisma without accountability
Need for economic stability
Things look good at first. A young leader brings in a young crowd. He is charismatic. More and more people come. Staff is needed. Thankfully, things are growing, so money comes in.

But soon we see some character issues. Dishonesty. Or indiscretion. Or…whatever. What happens?
In a healthy setting, a leader like this would be sidelined, confronted, and then held accountable. He would get counseling or coaching or whatever was needed in order to get healthy. Someone else would lead in the meantime.

But this leader is special, right?
If we sideline this leader, people will leave. And then our ministry may die. Or revenue may drop. Or we may miss our “moment.” Or our church may lose its reputation. Or we may use some spiritual reason: “Sure x has his flaws, but the Lord really uses him when he teaches.”
You see where it’s headed. So do I. But the people in the crowd don’t. Because they don’t know any of this. It’s usually kept quiet, if possible. Because we want to keep a good thing going.
And we feed it with our culture. Conferences, book deals, videos, etc., all tend to feature the same sort of person, because that’s what draws us in. We’d rather have a young, fit, hip, leader talk to us than a nondescript middle-aged pastor. Because that seems ordinary. Like us.
And therein lies the problem. Much of evangelicalism is founded on this theological principle known as “priesthood of the believer.” It’s the idea that everyone is filled with the Spirit. Everyone is a minister.

But it’s not what we package, sell, or embody.
We cast the vision that the person on the stage is different. Special. Separate.

And sometimes the person on the stage begins to believe it.

And when they do, and when we treat him/her as if they are, we set ourselves up for the inevitable fall.
This is why pastors/leaders of churches/orgs need people who love them but also call them out in their sin. I know I have people in my church who do just that to me. I don’t usually like it in the moment, but I always value it after the fact.
It’s also why we need pastors/leaders to openly discuss their flaws/sins. And go to counseling. And get coaching.

And why the *vast* majority of us who are “up front” for ministries and churches need to be unknown.

Most of us aren’t made for fame.
Of course, most of the people I know who go into the ministry don’t *start* that way. And most stay that way.

But you can see how if you’re exceptionally gifted and in the right (wrong) situation, you’ll end up in a dangerous place.
I don’t have a ton of solutions. Church is all about trust. Most pastors are good people genuinely seeking to serve the Lord. But we need to aware of the waters in which we swim. If not, corruption ensues.

At the end of the day, I need to realize that I am my biggest threat.
And, if I won’t, I need to have a system in place that will pull me off the stage and into repentance and healing.

The wounds of a friend can be trusted, but an enemy multiplies kisses.

Read that somewhere.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steve Bezner

Steve Bezner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Bezner

10 Feb
Women in Ministry, a 🧵: Over the last two years, my elders and I have been on a deep dive in order to better understand the role of women within the New Testament in order to provide clear guidance to our congregation, specifically the women in our congregation.
As a result, I read and re-read a number of books, commentaries and articles on the topic. I was reminded of a *number* of points I had forgotten, and I discovered a *host* of points I had never seen or heard.

In the end, such wide reading was extremely beneficial.
Wide reading helped me to more charitably understand the position of people I had previously disagreed with on this topic. Seeing their exegesis and reasoning up close helped me to become gracious. While disagreeing, I could *understand* why they reached their conclusions.
Read 8 tweets
6 Jan
Today is #Epiphany, the day we remember the magi from the east coming to pay homage to the Christ child.

Although the Bible is not explicit, I have long appreciated the theory that that magi are the spiritual descendants of the prophet Daniel.

There are several clues. (Cont.)
First , Daniel was a magi himself in the Babylonian court following his exile. The magi (wise men) served as counselors and dream interpreters to the king and his entourage. Joseph would have been a magi of sorts. Makes sense Daniel could have passed down prophecy in Babylon.
Second, they come from the East. This could be any number of places, but given the way geographical locations were discussed at the time, Babylon/Persia makes sense. They particularly would have resources to send such a caravan. Additionally, it rules out a place like Egypt.
Read 6 tweets
22 Dec 20
Admitting you were wrong,
or made a mistake,
or changed your mind on a topic

are signs of emotional and spiritual maturity and should be celebrated rather than ridiculed.

Growth is good.
My theology 20 years ago was different than it is now. I’ve read and learned a great deal.

I have lived and learned through countless mistakes in ministry and leadership.

I am, often painfully, still learning through many more today.

This is how maturity comes about.
One of the reasons evangelicals have seen so many pastors and leaders fall is that they have anointed someone as a genius in his/her 20s and given them little room to mature.

Hard to have room to change when everyone is celebrating you—before you’ve learned from mistakes.
Read 4 tweets
16 Dec 20
After 20+ years of pastoring, a thread of some thoughts for you youngsters and seminarians:

First, theology is important, but probably not in the way that you think it is.

Bottom line: theology—when pastoring—must be relentlessly tied to helping your church live out the faith.
In seminary, theology can serve primarily as an intellectual exercise, as the ultimate mind games. So we ask Qs like:

Does God predestine souls to an eternal destination before birth?
How do we reconcile the existence of God/evil?
How to make sense of certain Scriptures?

Etc.
These are good and even helpful—if we are constructing a pastoral framework with them. It is helpful to remember that many questions/situations have a *theological* response and a separate *pastoral* response. While the pastoral response may be informed by theology, it is unique.
Read 13 tweets
20 Nov 20
The house is quiet now, so story time.

Our topic tonight: Brokenness.

Yesterday one of my college buddies came to town and asked to meet. We sat in lawn chairs outside the church building and talked for quite a while.

He and his family have had quite the time of it.
Without going into too many details, there has been employment drama, kid issues, family stress, financial worry, and a few other sensitive things mixed in.

And yet…there has been an inescapable sense that the Lord is walking with them every step of the way.
That’s what I'm driving at when I talk about brokenness—spiritual brokenness leading to humility—the Presence of God in the midst of the valley.

This is something unique--something that marks people who I greatly admire.
Read 13 tweets
5 Oct 20
Lately I've been trying to ponder and circumvent the way (predominantly evangelical) church economics unintentionally hinder our effectiveness. Below are some observations. Would love any suggestions you may come up with.
I am on the board of an organization that works to start new churches in the city of Houston. I love the organization and believe it is one of the best things going in my city. Over the last five or so years, we have started several dozen churches. But, a problem arose.
We began to notice that it was very difficult to start new churches in economically depressed areas of the city. This is not because people didn't believe in the mission. Quite the opposite. It was because there was not enough funding in the neighborhood to support it.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!