Okay, so everyone is liking that I like Mary Chapin Carpenter, but honesty means that I have to tell the story of how I first saw her and why I didn't like her at all and it was a terrible night out. /1
I was a dating a very nice woman with taste in just about everything better than mine, and she said: MCC at the Birchmere just outside of DC, and you'll love it. And I was like...uh, country. Folk. No. This was mid-80s and I was all New Wave and Britpop. But I went. /2
Anyway, MCC was in a very folky phase then, and if I recall, comes in with an acoustic guitar and a long print dress and starts singing quiet, pretty songs, and by the end of that first pitcher of beer, even though I'm sitting near the stage, I am literally nodding off. /3
And the MCC sings this song about a shirt, and some kittens born in it, and how they died, and from that moment on for the rest of my relationship with that very nice lady, MCC was "Mary Chapin Dead Kitties" to me. I hated all that stuff. /4
So, years pass, relationships end, I move to New Hampshire, and I hear "Passionate Kisses" from "Come On Come On," and I think well, sure, Lucinda Williams wrote it. But it's not about dead cats. I kind of like it, and there's not much to do in New Hampshire, so I buy the CD. /5
That's when I hear "He Thinks He'll Keep Her" and "I Take My Chances" and "Walking Through Fire" and then I think... Maybe I had this artist wrong, and I go back and listen again to other stuff (besides the dead cat thing) and I become a fan. /6
The woman I dated was right, but an intro to MCC with an acoustic night at the Birchmere with a guy who is all about Boston and Cars and "I Melt With You" - well, that was just a misfire. So that's how I came to love MCC after really, really not loving her at first. /7x

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom Nichols

Tom Nichols Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RadioFreeTom

15 Feb
Just amplify the point @McFaul was making earlier, there is no doubt that Trump is an authoritarian and the people around him are wannabe authoritarians, but the history of mass movements tells you that they are not made by people like Trump. /1
Think of it this way: people like Trump are the initial bout of a sickness that leaves a society weak and open to opportunistic infection from authoritarians who are far more competent and capable of building an actual mass movement. /2
This is a serious danger, especially since Trump proved you can break down the guardrails of a constitutional republic and get away with it. But people who think that Trump is leading a mass movement are ignoring a lot of important historical realities about such movements. /3
Read 6 tweets
8 Feb
@Shoq @DanShenise No, it's not. Part of how we got here was in a culture - and on this, the conservatives are correct - that refused to differentiate between Romney and David Duke. You have no idea the effect of calling people Nazis for forty years. Your guys helped inure people to the charge. /1
@Shoq @DanShenise This is not the same as "you made them be Nazis." It's worse than that: the undifferentiated attacks on centrist GOPers convinced a lot of voters that there was no wolf, when there were plenty of wolves. I have been banging this drum for thirty years. /2
@Shoq @DanShenise I think the 1994 takeover was a shock to the GOP and most of the things you'd want to say about us after 1994 are true and legit. But "it was all you, it was always this way, and it's inherent in conservatism" is not only nuts, but helped create 2016. /3
Read 7 tweets
31 Jan
One of the things that's also amazing, and this response gets nearer to it, is that "economic grievance" arguments fail to make any class or *race* distinctions. /1
The people chanting in front of state capitols are not the poor and dispossessed. If economic grievance and inequality were the issue, black people would have overrun the Congress, not bored white realtors addicted to Instagramming their adventures. /2
If income inequality drove insane political behavior, black people - and black women, in particular, would not have saved the country and made Joe Biden the Democratic nominee. "All this political instability is about how I can't buy a house" is a very white argument. /3
Read 4 tweets
24 Jan
In the case of an authoritarian state like Russia, the way protest brings change is: the elites around Putin worry that public anger will sway the institutions of the state - the cops, the military - to refuse further repression. They start cutting deals internally. /1
People like @Kasparov63 and @IlvesToomas and others can speak about this with more authority, but regimes collapse when other institutions in the state decide the risk and anger from their fellow citizens is no longer worth what they gain from participating in repression. /2
This is what Putin fears most of all: Another Ukraine or Georgia type "color revolution," where popular anger makes basic administration of the state impossible and key players (like the power ministers) start defecting from the ruling coalition. /3
Read 7 tweets
23 Jan
Just to amplify David's excellent analogy, let me explain a few other things about Russia.

- There will be no Joe Biden elected six months after the protests.
- The entire Russian police state will remain in place even if Putin drops dead tomorrow.

/1
- The size of the Russian police apparatus is immense and centralized and is not just a bunch of local police departments

- In Russia, the media is not on the side of the protesters and will do everything it can to minimize them and stay out of Putin's way

/2
- Many of you have tweeted George Floyd's name, as well as Breonna Taylor and others. The fact that you know their names is a huge difference. People will be killed and tortured in Russia and you will never know who they are.

- Yes, Russia *does* target specific groups.

/3
Read 8 tweets
20 Jan
Everyone's reaching out and thanking each other for getting through this. I am not kidding that I will not fully relax until the nuclear codes are away from him. But thank you all for the support and enduring my TDS, which I also call "sanity." /1
People have thanked me for using a voice and a platform, but you folks gave that to me by reading me and putting up with me. (A half million of you!) Sometimes I wrote to buck up my own spirits, sometimes to buck up yours, and sometimes just to vent the anger we all felt. /2
You're not rid of me, of course. I and many others will stay on Trump's enablers pretty much forever. And I promise I will keep writing the really important stuff like shoes on airplanes and why Boston is better than the suckage of a certain overrated UK blues ripoff band. /3
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!