If Texas was on the national grid, our homes wouldn’t be as low as 15 degrees. But no, we had typical yeee-haw thinking we’re better than everyone. Or we could have planned ahead, made sure our wind turbines had cold weather packages - companies like Siemens sell them.../1
...given how much of our power comes from turbines now frozen. Oh, but to do that, theyd have to rely on climate change models that show this has been happening in Texas, would happen, & will get worse as warming air changes both pressure zones around Arctic and jet stream...2
...which has led to polar vortex to come much much further south. Instead, these idiots who think they know more than experts go “Yee-haw! Hardy-hardy-har! It’s so cold and the libs say global warming!! Har har. Let’s watch The Bachelor now.” This would not be anywhere near...3
...this bad if, 1. The USA invested money in our power grid. 2. If Texas either got on the national grid, bought cold temperature packages for turbines, or both, and 3. Listened to science. But as always, we are governed by the stupid who think they’re smart, who think..../4
...preparation is for wimps, who laugh at science and who are more concerned about lowering taxes than public safety. We’re captive to the dumbest among us. And through the people they vote in, we are rapidly turning into a 3d world country while cheering how exceptional we are.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
...just to score political points - and protect the profits of energy companies - is almost incomprehensible. These are people who would claim Social Security caused 9/11 if it was convenient. What caused this catastrophe is vast vast majority from gas, then coal/nuclear...2
...then wind. The ONLY source of power that is delivering more than expected in budgeting is wind. But that’s not convenient to say for the oil/gas/coal industry, so the @GregAbbott_TX@GovernorPerry@DanCrenshawTX stand atop our dead bodies lying to protect the companies...2
The craven anti-Americanism of @marcorubio@HawleyMO@LeaderMcConnell et al has long-term consequences. By arguing John Quincy Adams didn't understand the Constitution, & that impeachment after holding office - which applies to ALL impeachable, from cabinet members to jurists..1
...any Senate-confirmed official who swears to abide by the constitution can engage in ANY anti-constitutional act, can violate their oath with impunity at any time in office, immediately resign if caught, then run for elected office later. Sure, the #GQP will immediately flip..2
...to the opposite argument in those instances where they find it convenient, but anyone being subjected to impeachment could insist that they have no authority over them, impeachment is unconstitutional, and try even to take it to court, citing @marcorubio@HawleyMO and all.../3
Dems are correct in not calling witnesses, which is obvious when you think this through. First, the case has been made. Any GOPr or delusional Trump fan who doesnt accept that - or care - never will. The country knows/sees what happened. 2nd, if dems called witnesses.../1
...it will add next to nothing. Statements are being admitted into the record from some witnesses. Third, & most important, the GQP is a monstrosity that only cares about power. Once the witness door opens, they'll turn the trial into a farce, calling anyone and everyone.../2
...to muddy up the case. Since their entire case is whataboutism, they will try to call Obama, Hillary Clinton, Holder, Waters, and on and on. If the presiding officer holds the testimony irrelevant before allowing it, there will be weeks of rage about cover-ups, etc. The.../3
I truly believed - even as late as Tuesday - the @SenateGOP would treat this impeachment trial with the gravity and respect it deserves. A sitting president attacked our democracy. People died. The GOP could act like adults, and still go pure partisan & retain credibility.../1
...if they grew up, listened, recognized this is serious, recognize most of this country was horrified by the attack on our democracy by Trump and the terrorists, but still say “while trumps falsehoods about the election and calls to action were wrong, they didn’t amount to.../2
...incitement.” That would be dishonest, but at least it would acknowledge what happened here was important and, if found to have incited, would have constituted an impeachable act. But no, they are just saying any president can launch a months long attack on an election..../2
When MAGA waves flags with Trump's name, declares they will die for him, and accept every lie he says as truth, we are dealing with a deluded cult of personality. Here is a list of leaders treated exactly this same way. See if you detect the similarities:.../1
...
Russia: Stalin
Cambodia: Pol Pot
China: Mao Tse Tung
France: Philippe Petain (Vichy leader)
Germany: Hitler
Haiti: François Duvalier
Iran: Ruhollah Khomeini
Iraq: Saddam Hussein
Italy: Mussolini
N Korea: Kim Jong Il, Kim Jong Un
Phillipines: Ferdinand Marcos.../2
...
Romania: Nicolae Ceaușescu
Syria: Hafez al-Assad
Venezuela: Hugo Chávez
All of these leaders had huge support by people who worshiped them, just like Trump. The appeal to toxic nationalism, the demonization of the left & minority groups, the spread of disinformation.../3